Scotchbond universal adhesive

Manufactured by 3M

Sourced in United States, Germany

Scotchbond Universal Adhesive is a single-component, light-cured dental adhesive. It is designed to provide a durable bond between dental restorations and tooth structures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

Adhese universal, by Ivoclar Vivadent (3 mentions) Scotchbond universal etchant, by 3M (2 mentions) Relyx ultimate, by 3M (2 mentions) Alloy primer, by Kuraray (1 mentions) Astralis 7, by Ivoclar Vivadent (1 mentions) Ceram x mono, by Dentsply (1 mentions) Tray resin 2, by Shofu (1 mentions) Panavia v5, by Kuraray (1 mentions) Ketac molar easymix, by 3M (1 mentions) Clearfil ap x, by Kuraray (1 mentions) Filtek supreme ultra flowable, by 3M (1 mentions) Clearfil tri s bond, by Kuraray (1 mentions) Beautifil flow plus x f03, by Shofu (1 mentions) Clearfil universal bond, by Kuraray (1 mentions) G premio bond, by 3M (1 mentions) Filtek supreme, by 3M (1 mentions) Universal etchant, by 3M (1 mentions) Ips e max cad, by Ivoclar Vivadent (1 mentions) Tz 3y e, by Tosoh (1 mentions) Accutom 50, by Struers (1 mentions)

Spelling variants of this product

Scotchbond Universal (24 citations) Scotchbond Universal Plus adhesive (2 citations)

27 protocols using scotchbond universal adhesive

Sandblasting and Etching for Metal-Composite Bonding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

For sandblasting of the surface of SSCs, 50μm aluminum oxide particles were used for 20 seconds in such a way that the lingual surface of SSCs was completely sandblasted (Fig. 1B). After MST, specimens were etched with 9.6% hydrofluoric (HF) acid for 20 seconds. By doing so, the metal surface was cleansed. Specimens were then rinsed and dried. Next, the following two bonding systems along with the composite resins recommended by the manufacturers were applied:

1- Scotchbond Universal adhesive (Scotchbond^™ Universal adhesive, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany).

2- Alloy Primer (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan) plus Clearfil SE Primer and Bond (Kuraray, Okayama, Japan)

Ghadimi S., Heidari A, & Sarlak H. (2016). Comparison of Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Stainless Steel Crowns Using Two Mechanical Surface Treatments and Two Bonding Systems. Journal of Dentistry (Tehran, Iran), 13(1), 60-67.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Adhesive and Resin Composite Bonding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The materials used were for the adhesive protocol Scotchbond Universal Etchant ® and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive ® (3M ESPE Dental Products, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, batch 70201139014) and Ceram X mono ® (Dentsply, Milford, Delaware, USA, batch 141000804) for the composite resin. The polymerization involved use of light Astralis 7 ® (Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) for all samples. The irradiance tested with a curing radiometer was 750 mW/cm2, which was consistent during all procedures.

Mocquot C., Cabrera A., Colon P., Bosco J., Grosgogeat B, & Pradelle-Plasse N. (2017). Effect of a hyperbaric environment (diving conditions) on adhesive restorations: an in vitro study. British dental journal, 223(5).

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Bonding of Universal Adhesives to Enamel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The three universal adhesives used in this study were Adhese Universal (AU, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein), All Bond Universal (AB, Bisco, Schaumburg, IL, USA), and Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) (Table 1). A resin composite (Clearfil AP-X; Shade A2, Lot No. N416713, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) was used as the restorative material for bonding to enamel. A visible-light curing unit (Optilux 501, Demetron/Kerr, Danbury, CT, USA) was connected to a variable-voltage transformer in order to keep the power density above 600 mW/cm 2 , the value was determined using a dental curing radiometer (Model 100, Demetron/Kerr).
The enamel slabs were adhered to acrylic resin (Tray Resin II, Shofu) blocks using a cyanoacrylate adhesive (Zapit, Dental Ventures of American, Anaheim, CA, USA). A piece of double-sided adhesive tape with a 4-mm-diameter hole was used to define the adhesive area of the enamel for bonding. Each adhesive was

Yabuki C., Rikuta A., Murayama R., Akiba S., Suzuki S., Takamizawa T., Kurokawa H, & Miyazaki M. (2018). Effect of acid erosion on enamel bond strength of self-etch adhesives and sonic velocity measurement of enamel. Dental materials journal, 37(4).

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Comparative Evaluation of Dual-Cure Resin Cements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Two dual-cure resin cements, Panavia V5 (V5) with Panavia V5 Tooth Primer (Tooth Primer) (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan) and Rely X Ultimate (RXU) with Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU; 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were used. Each cement was dispensed from an auto-mixing syringe delivered by the manufacturer.

Kanamori Y., Takahashi R., Nikaido T., Bamidis E.P., Burrow M.F, & Tagami J. (2019). The effect of curing mode of a high-power LED unit on bond strengths of dualcure resin cements to dentin and CAD/CAM resin blocks. Dental materials journal, 38(6).

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Long-Term Evaluation of Scotchbond Universal

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The sample size calculation was based on the retention rates, postoperative sensitivity, adaptation, and marginal coloration of the Scotchbond Universal adhesive (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) for Class V restorations after 18 months [14 (link)], using α of 0.05 and a power of 80%. Thereby, the number of 50 teeth per group was determined to detect a difference of 20% in the tested groups.

Carvalho A.A., Leite M.M., Zago J.K., Nunes C.A., Barata T.D., Freitas G.C., Torres É.M, & Lopes L.G. (2019). Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin – a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial. BMC Oral Health, 19, 252.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Comparing ART and Conventional Dental Restorations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Participants will be randomly assigned into two different groups:

Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) (control): ART-restorations using high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC) Ketac Molar EasyMix (3 M/ESPE) with manual dosage and hand-mix powder-liquid.

Conventional Treatment (CT) (experimental): composite resin restoration, Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive (3 M/ESPE) and the Filtek Bulk Fill composite resin (3 M/ESPE).

Olegário I.C., Hesse D., Bönecker M., Imparato J.C., Braga M.M., Mendes F.M, & Raggio D.P. (2016). Effectiveness of conventional treatment using bulk-fill composite resin versus Atraumatic Restorative Treatments in primary and permanent dentition: a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health, 17, 34.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Bond Strength of Universal Adhesives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The materials used in this study are listed in Table 1, and include the universal adhesives Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SU, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA), G-Premio Bond (GP, GC, Tokyo, Japan), Adhese Universal (AU, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Lichtenstein), and All-Bond Universal (AB, Bisco Dental Products, Schaumburg, IL, USA). Bond strengths were determined for the resin composite Clearfil AP-X (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan).
Resin specimens were cured using a visible light curing unit (Optilux 501, Kerr, Danbury, CT, USA), and the power density (about 600 mW/cm 2 ) of the unit was checked using a dental radiometer (Model 100, Kerr) before preparation of specimens.

Tamura Y., Takamizawa T., Shimamura Y., Akiba S., Yabuki C., Imai A., Tsujimoto A., Kurokawa H, & Miyazaki M. (2017). Influence of air-powder polishing on bond strength and surface-free energy of universal adhesive systems. Dental materials journal, 36(6).

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Adhesive Application and Flowable Composite Placement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) was applied to the dentin surface for 20 s, gently air thinned for 5 s, and then light cured for 10 s.
Next, Filtek Supreme Ultra Flowable (A2, 3M ESPE) was placed as a thin layer on the cavity using a disposable applicator brush and light cured for 20 s 24) . Then, they were wiped with an alcohol cotton swab to remove the low conversion layer on the resin-coated surface 1) . The tooth specimens were randomly divided into nine groups (five teeth per group) after subjecting them to the three temporary sealing materials and the three cleaning protocols (Table 2).

Sato T., Takahashi R., Rozan S., Uchiyama S., Baba Y., Vicheva M., Sato A., Ikeda M., Takagaki T., Nikaido T, & Tagami J. (2021). The effect of temporary sealing materials and cleaning protocols on the bond strength of resin cement applied to dentin using the resin-coating technique. Dental materials journal, 40(3).

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Single-step Adhesive Curing Light Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

As presented in Table 1, the single-step self-etch adhesive systems used were: Scotchbond™ Universal Adhesive (3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA); Clearfil™ Tri-S Bond (Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan); and G-Bond™ Plus (GC, Tokyo, Japan).
A visible-light curing unit (Optilux 501, Demetron Kerr, Danbury, CT, USA) was connected to a variablevoltage transformer (Type S-130-10, Yamabishi Electric, Tokyo, Japan). The light intensities used were 100, 200, 400, and 600 mW/cm 2 ; these values were determined using a dental curing radiometer (Model 100, Demetron Kerr). The curing unit was placed in a jig to maintain the distance between the light tip end and specimen surface (2 mm).

Nojiri K., Tsujimoto A., Suzuki T., Shibasaki S., Matsuyoshi S., Takamizawa T, & Miyazaki M. (2015). Influence of light intensity on surface-free energy and dentin bond strength of single-step self-etch adhesives. Dental materials journal, 34(5).

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Evaluation of New Flowable Composites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

The 4 new generation flowable composites used in this study were: (1) Beautifil Flow Plus X F03 (BF, Shofu, Kyoto, Japan), (2) Clearfil Majesty ES Flow Low (CM, Kuraray Noritake Dental, Tokyo, Japan), (3) Estelite Universal Flow Medium Flow (EU, Tokuyama Dental, Tokyo, Japan), and (4) G-ænial Universal Injectable (GU, GC, Tokyo, Japan). A single conventional flowable composite developed 15 years ago, Unifil LoFlow Plus (UP, GC), and 1 bulk-fill flowable resin composite, Filtek Bulk Fill Flowable (FF, 3M Oral Care, St. Paul, MN, USA), were used for comparison. The flowable composites used in this study are indicated in Table 1.
In this study, each flowable composite was used with the adhesive recommended by the manufacturer. The 4 light-cure universal adhesives used in this study were: (1) Beautifil Bond Universal (Shofu) for BF, (2) Clearfil Universal Bond (Kuraray Noritake Dental) for CM, (3) G-Premio Bond (GC) for GU and UP, and (4) Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (3M Oral Care) for FF. A single chemical-cure universal adhesive was used: Tokuyama Universal Bond (Tokuyama Dental) for EU. The universal adhesive used in this study and manufactures instructions are indicated in Table 2 and Table 3.

Tsujimoto A., Irie M., Teixeira E.C., Jurado C.A., Maruo Y., Nishigawa G., Matsumoto T, & Garcia-Godoy F. (2021). Relationships between Flexural and Bonding Properties, Marginal Adaptation, and Polymerization Shrinkage in Flowable Composite Restorations for Dental Application. Polymers, 13(16), 2613.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!