The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using cd20 pe

1

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of CLL Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CLL cells from all the blood samples were stained with optimal concentrations of antibody combinations and directed against the following surface antigens: CD183(CXCR3)-FITC, CD20-PE, CD5-PerCP-Cy5.5, CD38-Pe-Cy7, CD49d-APC, CD19-APC-Cy7, CD184 (CXCR4)-BV421 and HLA-DR-BV510 (all procured from BioLegend), as previously reported [5 (link),15 (link)]. Isotype-matched antibodies (BioLegend) were used as negative controls.
The determination of s-CLL and l-CLL cells was conducted using FSC data and a back-gating strategy. The analysis was performed using a BD FACSCanto II (Becton Dickinson) instrument, and data acquisition was performed using BD FACSDiva software (v.8.0.2; Becton Dickinson). Flow cytometry data were analysed using FlowJo v.X0.7 software (Tree Star, Inc., San Carlos, CA, USA). In all the experiments, a minimum of 10,000 events was counted. The results were expressed as a percentage and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the size of peripheral blood leukocyte and BM nucleated cell populations, cells were labeled with the following antibodies against human cell surface markers: anti-human cluster of differentiation (CD)235a-phycoerythrin (PE), CD14-PE-cyanin 5, CD16-PE, CD20-PE, CD203c-PE, CD3-PE-cyanin 5, CD4-PE-cyanin 5, CD4-PE-cyanin 7, CD8-PE-cyanin 5, and CD56-PE (all from BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA); CD71-PE-cyanin 5, CD3-PE, and CD11c-PE (all from BD Biosciences); and CD141-allophycocyanin (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The total lymphocyte population was determined from forward and side scatter, and CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and B cells were separated into CD3+/CD4+, CD3+/CD8+, CD56+/CD3−, and CD20+ populations, respectively. The monocyte population was determined from forward and side scatter and by CD14 expression. The granulocyte population was gated by forward and side scatter, and neutrophils and eosinophils were separated according to CD16 expression (CD16+ and CD16−, respectively). Basophils were isolated as the CD203c+ population. Plasmacytoid DCs, CD1c+ myeloid DCs, and CD141high myeloid DCs were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells on a FACSAriaII cell sorter as previously described [39 (link)]. Erythroid cells present in the BM cell population were gated according to CD235 and CD71 (TFR1) expression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Immune Cell Profiles in Treated Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thawed PBMCs samples were taken from five patients (two in cured group and three in uncured group). A total of 15 blood samples were collected at 3 time points: day 0 (the day before), week 24, and week 48 of treatment. Samples were washed 3 times by 1x PBS with centrifugation at 400 g for 6 min and counted for cell numbers. 500,000 cells per tube were then stained for 30 min on ice with antibodies. For flow cytometric analyses, the following antibodies were used: CD3 (CD3-FITC; BioLegend, cat#300305), CD4 (CD4-APC-Cy7; BioLegend, cat#317418), CD8 (CD8-PerCP-Cy5.5; BioLegend, cat#344710), CD19 (CD19-APC; BioLegend, cat#302212), CD20 (CD20-PE; BioLegend, cat#302306), CD25 (CD25-APC; BioLegend, cat#302610), CD127 (CD127-PE; BioLegend, cat#351304), and PD-1 (PD-1-BV421; BioLegend, cat#329920). Cells stained by antibodies were resuspended in 1x PBS, and analyzed by flow cytometry using BD LSR Fortessa cell analyzer. Flow cytometry data were analyzed using FlowJo (version 10.4.0). Accordingly, B cells and Treg cells were selected as CD19+ CD20+ and CD3+ CD4 + CD25+ CD127 subsets, independent CD3+ clustering of either CD4+ or CD8+ T cells with PD-1+ used for identifying PD-1 expression respectively from lymphocytes. Flow cytometry gating strategies for CD3+CD4+/CD3+CD8+ T cell populations see Supplementary Figure 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Panel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following fluorochrome-labeled human monoclonal antibodies were used for flow cytometry analysis: CD3-PerCP-Cy™5.5 (SP34-2, BD Biosciences), CD4-PE/Cyanine7 (OKT4, BioLegend), CD8α-Brilliant Violet 711™ (SK1, BioLegend), CD8β- PE/Cyanine7 (SIDI8BEE, eBioscience), CD1a-FITC (NA1/34-HLK, Invitrogen), CD1b-APC (SN13, BioLegend), CD1c-APC (L161, BioLegend), CD1d-Brilliant Violet 421™ (51.1, BioLegend), CD11b-PE (ICRF44, BD Biosciences), CD11c-PE (3.9, BioLegend), CD14-PE (M5E2, BD Biosciences), CD20-PE (2H7, BioLegend), CD28-PE (CD28.2, BD Biosciences), CD31-Brilliant Violet 421™ (WM59, BioLegend), CD69 (FN50, BioLegend), HLA-ABC (G46-2.6, BD Biosciences), HLA-DR, DP, DQ (Tü39, BioLegend), CCR7-PE (G043H7, BioLegend), CXCR3-PE/Cyanine7 (G025H7, BioLegend), CD95-Brilliant Violet 510™ (DX2, BioLegend), CD159a (NKG2AC)-APC (Z199, Beckman Coulter), TCR Vβ F1- PE/Cyanine7 (8AC, Invitrogen), TCR Vα24-Jα18- APC/Cyanine7 (6B11, BioLegend), TCR Vα7.2-APC/Cyanine7 (3C10, BioLegend), PLZF-PE (Mags.21F7, eBioscience), EOMES-FITC (WD1928, eBioscience), and IL-4-Brilliant Violet 421™ (MP4-25D2, BioLegend).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Single-cell Flow Cytometry of Intestinal Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions from lamina propria were analyzed by flow cytometry according to standard procedure using fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies targeting HLA-A2–PE (Abcam); CD20-FITC, CD45-APC-H7, and Ki67-FITC (BD); Bcl2–Alexa Fluor 488, BCMA-PE, CD3-APC, CD14-APC, CD19–Alexa Flour 488/PE-Cy7, CD20-PE, CD27-BV421/Pacific blue/APC-Cy7/PE-Cy7, CD28–Alexa Fluor 488, CD38-PE/APC-Cy7, CD45-BV510/APC-Cy7, CD56–Alexa Flour 488, CD95-PE, and HLA-DR–BV605/PerCP (BioLegend); CD138-FITC/PE-Cy7 and HLA-A3–FITC/APC (eBioscience); HLA-B7–PE (EMD Millipore); HLA-B8–PE (Miltenyi Biotec); IgA-FITC/PE, IgM-FITC/PE, and IgD-FITC/PE (SouthernBiotech); and Blimp-1–DyLight 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For detection of intracellular antigens, cells were fixed in formaldehyde and permeabilized using a Foxp3 staining buffer set (eBioscience). Detection of rotavirus-specific PCs was performed using eGFP-tagged virus-like particle 2 (VLP2)–eGFP/VLP6 (provided by D. Poncet and A. Charpilienne, Institut de Biologie Integrative de la Cellule, Paris, France; Charpilienne et al., 2001 (link)) at a final concentration of 1 µg/ml. eGFP (Promega) was used as a negative control. All flow cytometry was performed on an LSRFortessa, and FACS was performed on a FACSAriaII flow cytometer (both from BD). Data were analyzed using FlowJo 10 (Tree Star), and figures were assembled in Illustrator CS4 (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cytokine Profile of Activated PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were incubated overnight with 10 ng/ml LPS (Sigma-Aldrich) in the presence of GolgiPlug (1:1,000, Becton Dickinson) after pre-stimulation with IFN-γ for 2 h. The cells were then incubated with conjugated primary antibodies in phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% bovine serum albumine for 30 min. The antibodies used were CD3-PE, CD14-Pacfic Blue, CD16-PE-Cy7, CD20-PE, and CD56-PE (all Biolegend) at 4°C and were incubated with EDTA for 15 min followed by incubation with FACS permeabilizing solution 2 (BD Biosciences) for 15 min. Next, conjugated antibodies to TNF-α-Percp-Cy5.5, IFN-γ-APC-Cy7, IL-1β-FITC, IL-6-APC, and IL-10-APC and their respective isotype controls (all Biolegend) were added to determine intracellular cytokine production. The cells were washed and analyzed using flow cytometry (FACSCanto II, BD Biosciences) and FACSDiva software (16 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!