The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using surveyor ms pump plus

1

Pigment Analysis via HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pigment extract was filtered and analyzed with a Thermo HPLC system (Thermo, SURVEYOR MS Pump Plus) equipped with a μBondapak C18 column (10 μm particle size, 3.9 × 300 mm, 125 A° pore size, Waters). 1 μl pigment solution was eluted with acetonitrile/water (90 : 10, v/v) at 200 μl/min. The spectrum from 200 nm to 800 nm was monitored with SURVEYOR PDA Plus Detector. Pigment was identified from their absorption spectra.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Qualitative Analysis of Extracts by LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qualitative analysis of the extracts was performed using liquid chromatography (system Surveyor MS PUMP PLUS, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy) coupled with mass spectrometry (LTQ ion-trap mass spectrometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy) equipped with an ESI (-) source.
The compounds were separated with a Synergi 4 μm Hydro-RP 80° A LC Column 150 × 4.6 mm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) using a mobile phase consisting of water with 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B) set as follows: 0–1 min (5% B), 1–10 min (5–100% B), 10–15 min (100% B), and 15–25 min (100–5% B).
The extracts were injected at 0.1 mg/mL in a volume of 10 μL. The results were analyzed with Xcalibur™ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy). Putative identification of individual compounds was conducted by comparing m/z and MS/MS with the literature data [33 (link),34 (link),35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Robenidine Hydrochloride Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Robenidine Hydrochloride (Purity ≥ 98%, Quality ratio, Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH, Augsburg, Germany), Robenidine-D8 Standard (Purity ≥ 98%, Quality ratio, Dr. Ehrenstorfer GmbH, Augsburg, Germany), and Robenidine Hydrochloride Raw Material (CAS 25875-50-7, Purity 98%, Shouguang Huachih Chemical Co., Shandong, China) were used. Ethyl acetate, hexane, and formic acid (chromatographic purity, J.T. Baker Co., NJ, USA). Anhydrous ethanol (analytically pure, Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd., Fujian, China), distilled water, soluble starch (analytically pure, Xiangzhong Chemical Reagent Supply Station, Shanghai, China), anhydrous magnesium sulfate (analytically pure, Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), and heparin sodium (biological grade, Shanghai Biochemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Mettler-TOLE-DOAE-240 precision electronic balance (Mettler-Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland), 20PR-520 high-speed refrigerated centrifuge (Hitachi, Japan), speed mixer (Shanghai Kanghua, Shanghai, China), nitrogen blower (AOSHENG, Hangzhou Aosheng Instrument Co., Ltd., Zhejiang, China), rotary evaporator (Gongyi Yuhua, Henan, China), HPLC–Tandem Mass Spectrometer (Surveyor MS Pump Plus, Surveyor Autosampler Plus, Thermo TSQ Quantum Access MAX and Thermo LCquan 2.6 data acquisition system, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Gemcitabine and dFdU by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gemcitabine and its metabolite dFdU were analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Briefly, mouse tissue and plasma samples were homogenized in PBS and extracted with ice cold acetonitrile containing the internal standard colofarabine 2.5ng/ml. The extracts were dried and taken up in HPLC mobile phase A (below). LC-MS/MS analysis was performed in positive ion mode using a Thermo Scientific Surveyor MS Pump Plus and Thermo Scientific TSQ Quantum Ultra fitted with Atlantis™ dC18 5 µm, 2.1 × 150 mm column at 30°C. Mobile phase A consisted of 2% acetonitrile 0.5% formic acid and mobile phase B was 98% acetonitrile 0.5% formic acid and initial gradient was 1% B and increasing to 100% B at 7.5 minutes. Using the LC-MS/MS method used at RPCI for evaluation of clinical samples, two calibration curves were prepared with a range of 0.5ng/ml to 1000ng/ml and duplicate quality controls were run at 3 concentrations (7.5, 75ng/ml and 750ng/ml). Overall average precision of the gemcitabine calibrators was 6.89% with % accuracy ranging from 94.5% to 107.9%. Gemcitabine quality controls had an average precision of 1.36% with % accuracy ranging from 94% to 101%. Gemcitabine for calibration was obtained from Toronto Research Chemicals (Cat# G305000, Lot# 17-ANR-123-1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimized LC-MS Profiling of Complex Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC system consisted of a quaternary, low-pressure mixing pump with vacuum degassing, type Surveyor MSpump Plus and an autosampler with temperature controlled tray and column oven, type Autosampler Plus, both from ThermoFisher Scientific (Breda, The Netherlands). Chromatographic separation was achieved on a Zorbax Eclipse Plus column (100 mm × 3.0 mm i.d., dp: 3.5 μm) in combination with a guard column of the same type (13 mm × 3.0 mm i.d., dp: 3.5 μm), both from Agilent (Diegem, Belgium). The temperatures of the column oven and autosampler tray were set a 45°C and 5°C, respectively. Mobile phase A consisted of 0.1% glacial acetic acid in water whereas mobile phase B was ACN. Following gradient elution program was run: 0–3.5 min (92% A, 8% B), 3.5-4.0 min (linear gradient to 80% A), 4.0-8.0 min (80% A, 20% B), 8.0-8.5 min (linear gradient to 92% A), 8.5-13.0 min (92% A, 8% B). Flow rate was set at 500 μL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive LC-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Qualitative and quantitative analyses were carried out by LC–MS/MS using a LC system Surveyor MS PUMP PLUS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy) coupled with an LTQ ion-trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Monza, Italy) equipped with an ESI source operating in the negative mode. The column used was a XSelect HSS T3 XP (100 Å, 2.5 μm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Waters, Sesto San Giovanni, Italy) with a flow rate of 0.15 mL/min. A gradient elution was performed, and the mobile phase was a mixture of water containing 0.1% formic acid (A) and acetonitrile (B). The elution gradient was set as follows: 0–1 min (5% B), 1–10 min (5–100% B), 10–15 min (100% B), 15–25 min (100–5% B). The operating conditions for MS analysis were as follows: spray voltage, −5 kV; capillary temperature, 250 °C; sheath gas and auxiliary gas flow, 60 and 5 arbitrary units, respectively; tube lens, −110 V; total ion current (TIC); base peak-dependent mass range, m/z 230–1500; collision energy, 20 eV.
Compounds in the extract (injection: 25 μg) were identified by comparison of the retention times and mass spectra with those of authentic compounds (injection: 5 or 10 ng) commercially available at a high grade of purity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Microcystins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An LTQ XL Linear Ion Trap coupled with Surveyor MS Pump Plus (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MS, USA) was used with sheath and auxiliary gas flow at 40 and 10 arbitrary units, respectively, capillary temperature 275 °C, isolation width 1.0, with source voltage at 3.5 kV (negative ionization) and 5 kV (positive ionization). Separations were achieved using a Kinetex F5 LC column (2.6 μm, 150 × 2.1 mm, Phenomenex) and mobile phases (A) water and (B) 95% CH3CN, both containing 2 mM formic acid and 3.6 mM ammonium formate. The gradient (0.2 mL min−1) was A 75–30% over 6 min, 30–75% A over 3 min, and held at 75% A for 2 min, with 20 μL full-loop injections.
Oxidized standards (10 μg mL−1) of MC-LR (9), [ADMAdda5]MC-LR (3) and [DMAdda5]MC-LR (1) were scanned in negative ionization mode. A list of target molecular ions was generated based on full-scan mass spectra. MS/MS spectra (negative ionization) were obtained using 20% CE for m/z 207 (MMPB), m/z 193 (2R-methyl-3S-hydroxy-4-phenylbutanoic acid (MHPB)) and m/z 291 (2-methyl-3-oxo-4R-methyl-5S-acetyloxy-6-phenylhexanoic acid (MOMAPH)). MS/MS/MS spectra were obtained for additional characterization of m/z 291 (MOMAPH) using 35% CE of the dominant product ion in the MS/MS spectrum (m/z 231). Positive ionization was also used for MS/MS characterization of m/z 293 (MOMAPH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Analysis of Drugs by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasma samples (5 μL) were spiked with an internal standard (10 μL of 400 ng/mL phenacetin) and mixed with 100 μL of acetonitrile for protein precipitation. Chromatographic separation was achieved using a gradient system of 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in water and 0.1%(v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile as follows: The HPLC column is a Luna® 3μm C18(2) 100Å LC column 100 × 4.6mm (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) with a C-18 guard cartridge 3*4 mm. Analysis was performed on a TSQ Quantum Ultra triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with Surveyor MS pump plus and Surveyor Antosampler plus (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA). The mass spectrometer was operated in electrospray positive ionization mode with a spray voltage of 4900 V, sheath gas (nitrogen) flow rate of 49 arbitrary units, and auxiliary gas flow rate of 5 arbitrary units. The capillary temperature is 320°C. Argon was used as the collision gas at a pressure of 0.8 mTorr. The mass transitions were as follows: m/z 195→138 for Caffeine, m/z 181→124 for paraxanthine, m/z 346→198 Omeprazole, m/z 362→214 for 5-hydroxyomeprazole, m/z 326→291 for midazolam, m/z 342→324 for 1-hydroxymidazolam, m/z 423→207 for losartan, m/z 437→207 for EXP-3174, m/z 272→215 for dextromethorphan, m/z 258→157 for dextrorphan, and m/z 180→110 for phenacetin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

LC-MS/MS Quantification of Tetrodontoxin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All extracted samples were analyzed in triplicate for TTX using LC-MS/MS, according to the method of Lee et al. [34 (link)]. TTX was quantified using a triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (TSQ Quantum Discovery Max; Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA, USA) coupled to an HPLC system. The HPLC unit consisted of a Surveyor MS Pump Plus and Surveyor AS Plus (Thermo Electron, San Jose, CA, USA). Chromatographic separations were performed on a TSK Gel-amide-80 column (250 × 0.2 mm, 5 μm; Tosoh Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan) preceded by a guard column cartridge (4.0 × 0.2 mm; Tosoh Bioscience). Eluents A (0.1% formic acid) and B (methanol) were used for the linear gradient elution, with 10 µL of injection volume. The mass spectrometer was operated with SRM, detecting in positive ionization mode, with the product ions at m/z 302, 256, and 162 from the parent ion at m/z 320 for quantification of the TTX (Supplementary Figure S1). The calibration curve was generated with TTX standard solutions (6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 ng/mL), which were >0.99 of the correlation coefficient (r2) with good linearity. The limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantitation (LOQ) were determined using a signal-to-noise ratio (S/N = 3) and a concentration of LOD × 3, respectively. LOD and LOQ were 0.01 μg/g and 0.03 μg/g, respectively. The TTX concentrations in the samples are expressed as μg/g wet weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!