3t magnetom trio

Manufactured by Siemens

Sourced in Germany, United States

The 3T MAGNETOM Trio is a high-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system designed for clinical and research applications. It features a 3 Tesla superconducting magnet, providing a strong and stable magnetic field for high-quality imaging. The system is capable of performing a wide range of MRI examinations, including neurological, musculoskeletal, and body imaging.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

32 channel head coil, by Siemens (5 mentions) Magnetom verio 3t, by Siemens (4 mentions) Magnetom 7t, by Siemens (2 mentions) Lightspeed qx i, by GE Healthcare (1 mentions) 12 channel head coil, by Siemens (1 mentions) Presentation software, by Neurobehavioral Systems (1 mentions) 1.5 t magnetom espree, by Siemens (1 mentions) 1.5 t magnetom avanto, by Siemens (1 mentions) Somatom definition flash, by Siemens (1 mentions) Prisma, by Siemens (1 mentions) Rompun, by Bayer (1 mentions) Discovery mr750 3t mri, by GE Healthcare (1 mentions) Psychtoolbox, by MathWorks (1 mentions) Matlab, by MathWorks (1 mentions) Magnetom skyra 3t, by Siemens (1 mentions) Magnevist, by Bayer (1 mentions) Telazol, by Zoetis (1 mentions) Voiager software, by GE Healthcare (1 mentions) Magnetom symphony 1 5t, by Siemens (1 mentions) Achieva 1.5t, by Philips (1 mentions)

Close spelling variants of this product

3T Magnetom Trio MRI system Avanto 3T Magnetom TIM Trio scanner MAGNETOM Trio whole-body 3T MR scanner MAGNETOM Trio Tim 3T MR scanner MAGNETOM Trio 3T Imager Magnetom Trio 3T whole Magnetom Trio 3T whole body MRI scanner 3T Magnetom Tim Trio MRI 3T MAGNETOM Trio Tim Magnetom Trio 3T MR system

85 protocols using 3t magnetom trio

Multimodal Neuroimaging of Brain Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Data were acquired using a Siemens 3 T Magnetom Trio scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magnetic Resonance Research Center using a 12-channel phased-array head coil. Structural images, for use in aligning fMRI data, were obtained using an MPRAGE sequence (TR = 2100 ms, flip angle = 8°, inversion time =1050 ms, voxel size = 1 × 1 mm, 192 contiguous 1-mm slices).
Functional images were acquired using an echoplanar sequence sensitive to BOLD contrast (T2*). Four runs of task-based fMRI data were collected (each run: three minutes, two seconds). The fMRI scan parameters for the task were the following: TR = 2000 ms, flip angle = 80°, voxel size = 1.71875 × 1.71875 mm in plane, 33 3-mm axial slices separated by gaps of 0.75 mm, 728 TRs. We collected five minutes of resting-state data with eyes closed while awake. rsfMRI parameters were the following: TR = 2000 ms, flip angle = 80°, voxel size = 1.719 × 1.719 mm in plane, 33 contiguous 3.75-mm axial slices, 150 TRs.

Ravindranath O., Ordaz S.J., Padmanabhan A., Foran W., Jalbrzikowski M., Calabro F.J, & Luna B. (2020). Influences of affective context on amygdala functional connectivity during cognitive control from adolescence through adulthood. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 45, 100836.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Multimodal Imaging of Glioblastoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

CT and MR images of fifteen subjects diagnosed with brain tumors (glioblastoma) were retrospectively analyzed to create the template. The MR images were acquired on a 3T MAGNETOM Trio (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). T1-weighted 3D-MPRAGE MR images were acquired after administration of MR contrast agent (Magnevist) (see Supplementary Material for details).
All subjects underwent CT examinations within one month of their MRI scans (GE LightSpeed QX/i, Waukesha, WI). No surgical interventions were performed in the interval between the CT and MR imaging sessions. All subjects gave written informed consent and the local Institutional Review Board approved the study.

Izquierdo-Garcia D., Hansen A.E., Förster S., Benoit D., Schachoff S., Fürst S., Chen K.T., Chonde D.B, & Catana C. (2014). An SPM8-based Approach for Attenuation Correction Combining Segmentation and Non-rigid Template Formation: Application to Simultaneous PET/MR Brain Imaging. Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 55(11), 1825-1830.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Dynamic 4D MRI Angiography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All healthy volunteers were scanned on a 3 T MAGNETOM Trio, a Tim system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) under a technical development protocol agreed with local ethics and institutional committees. A 12 channel head RF receive coil was used in combination with the body coil for RF transmission.
Five volunteers (four male, one female; age range 25–38) were scanned with the full 4D protocol described above, and four of these were also scanned with the dynamic 2D protocol in the transverse view. A comparison of bSSFP and SPGR dynamic 2D protocols was made in one additional subject (male, 30), with flip angles and T_R values as listed for the three regimes described in the simulations section. Further imaging parameters for these protocols are given in Supplementary Table 1.
Dynamic 2D VEPCASL bSSFP angiograms were also acquired in coronal and sagittal orientations in another additional subject (male, 25) with the slab thickness increased to 100 mm to encompass the majority of the intra‐ and extra‐cranial arteries.

Okell T.W., Schmitt P., Bi X., Chappell M.A., Tijssen R.H., Sheerin F., Miller K.L, & Jezzard P. (2016). Optimization of 4D vessel‐selective arterial spin labeling angiography using balanced steady‐state free precession and vessel‐encoding. Nmr in Biomedicine, 29(6), 776-786.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Imaging was carried out using a 3 T MAGNETOM Trio (Siemens Healthcare, Malvern, PA, USA). A T1-weighted (MPRAGE) structural scan (voxel size 1×1×1 mm) was collected and used for registration purposes. A T2*-weighted, gradient echo planar image scan sequence (voxel size 3×3×3 mm) was used to collect functional imaging data during the word-cue and faces task.

Finnegan S.L., Harrison O.K., Harmer C.J., Herigstad M., Rahman N.M., Reinecke A, & Pattinson K.T. (2021). Breathlessness in COPD: linking symptom clusters with brain activity. The European Respiratory Journal, 58(5), 2004099.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Resting-State fMRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

MRI data were collected on a Siemens 3 T MAGNETOM Trio equipped with a 12-channel head coil. We first acquired high-resolution T₁-MPRAGE images (repetition time/echo time/flip angle = 6.2 s/3 ms/9°, 1 mm³ isotropic voxel size, field of view = 256 × 256 × 176 mm, 144 sagittal images). Resting state functional images were acquired by T₂*-weighted fast echo planar imaging (repetition time/echo time/flip angle = 3.3 s/30 ms/90°, voxel size = 1.5 × 1.5 × 2.5 mm, 200 volumes acquired per subject) from 46 interleaved axial slices. The resting state functional MRI experiment consisted of a 10-min run in which participants were asked to relax with their eyes closed, without falling asleep. A field map was acquired to correct for echo planar image distortions induced by each subject’s individual magnetic susceptibilities. A quality control was systematically performed on the MRI data. In this control, we verified the wrapping or ghosting in the anatomical images. In addition, for the functional images, we verified the presence of susceptibility artefacts, spiking, ringing, or motion slice artefacts. All images with head motions superior to 3 mm during resting state were excluded from the analysis.

Gallea C., Popa T., García-Lorenzo D., Valabregue R., Legrand A.P., Apartis E., Marais L., Degos B., Hubsch C., Fernández-Vidal S., Bardinet E., Roze E., Lehéricy S., Meunier S, & Vidailhet M. (2016). Orthostatic tremor: a cerebellar pathology?. Brain, 139(8), 2182-2197.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Resting-State fMRI Acquisition and Preprocessing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Data acquisition, pre-processing, and analyses followed the same steps for the four resting state runs (rs1, rs2, rs3, and rs4). A Siemens 3-T Magnetom Trio MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12 channel head coil was used. For anatomical details, a 3D high-resolution T1-weighted image was obtained first (magnetization prepared rapid gradient echo, time repetition/time echo = 2300/2.98 ms, 1 mm × 1 mm × 1.1 mm voxels, field of view (FOV) = 240 × 256, 160 sagittal slices), lasting 8 min. Then a field map was acquired to address local distortions.
Functional resting state data were acquired with a descending gradient echo planar imaging (EPI) pulse sequence for T₂^∗ - weighted images (repetition time = 3,000 ms; echo time = 30 ms; flip angle = 90°; 50 oblique axial slices each 2.8 mm thick; inter-slice gap = 0.028 mm; in-plane resolution 2.5 mm × 2.5 mm; 80 × 80 matrix, 160 volumes).

Solesio-Jofre E., Beets I.A., Woolley D.G., Pauwels L., Chalavi S., Mantini D, & Swinnen S.P. (2018). Age-Dependent Modulations of Resting State Connectivity Following Motor Practice. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 10, 25.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Neuroimaging Analysis of Choice Behavior

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Data were acquired using A Siemens 3T Magnetom Trio whole-body scanner at Rutgers University Brain Imaging Center (RUBIC), and analyzed using BrainVoyager QZ (v2.3, Brain Innovation). Choice and no-choice cues were compared in the previously defined ROIs and across the whole-brain.

Leotti L.A, & Delgado M.R. (2014). The value of exercising control over monetary gains and losses. Psychological science, 25(2), 596-604.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

fMRI Protocol for Cognitive Neuroscience

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Images were collected on a Siemens 3T Magnetom Trio scanner (Siemens Medical Systems, Erlangen, Germany). Using an echo-planar pulse sequence, 29 ascending slices (5mm thick with 10% gap) were acquired per volume (TR = 2 seconds; TE = 40ms; 64 x 64 matrix). Six dummy volumes were initially collected and a total of 144 experimental volumes (48 per global, local and match condition). An MR-compatible button press apparatus allowed for simultaneous recording of behavioral data. Stimuli were projected onto a screen located at the top end of the magnet bore, allowing participants to view stimuli via a mirror connected to the head coil. Presentation software (Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc.) controlled stimulus delivery, as well as logged button press responses.

Liddell B.J., Das P., Battaglini E., Malhi G.S., Felmingham K.L., Whitford T.J, & Bryant R.A. (2015). Self-Orientation Modulates the Neural Correlates of Global and Local Processing. PLoS ONE, 10(8), e0135453.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

MEG Data Acquisition and Processing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

MEG data were recorded in a magnetically shielded room while participants lay supine, using a 151-channel CTF system (CTF MEG International Services LP, Coquitlam, BC, Canada). Data were sampled at 600 Hz with an online 0 to 150 Hz anti-aliasing filter, and to attenuate environmental noise a third-order spatial gradient was used. Fiducial coils situated at the left and right pre-auricular points and nasion monitored head location, and were replaced with radio-opaque markers for co-registration with T1-weighted MR images. Individual structural T1-weighted images were obtained on a Siemens 3 T MAGNETOM Trio with a 12-channel head coil (TR/TE = 2300/2.96 ms, FA = 9°, FOV = 240x256mm, # slices = 192, resolution = 1.0 mm isotropic) scanner, or on a PrismaFIT with a 20-channel head and neck coil (TR/TE = 1870/3.14 ms, FA = 9°, FOV = 240x256mm, # slices = 192, resolution = 0.8 mm isotropic) scanner, as a result of a scanner upgrade.

Safar K., Pang E.W., Vandewouw M.M., de Villa K., Arnold P.D., Iaboni A., Ayub M., Kelley E., Lerch J.P., Anagnostou E, & Taylor M.J. (2023). Atypical oscillatory dynamics during emotional face processing in paediatric obsessive–compulsive disorder with MEG. NeuroImage : Clinical, 38, 103408.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

Concurrent TMS-MRI Experiment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Concurrent TMS-MRI data were collected at the Henry H. Wheeler Jr. Brain Imaging Center at the University of California, Berkeley, using a Siemens 3T MAGNETOM Trio (Erlangen, Germany). TMS was delivered with the MR-compatible figure-8 Mri-B91 TMS coil produced by MagVenture (Farum, Denmark) with the MagPro X100 with MagOption running software version 7.1.1. 3D stereotaxic tracking, referred to as neuronavigation, was performed using Rogue Research’s BrainSight v2.2.11 (Montreal, Canada) with a Northern Digital Polaris Spectra infrared long-range camera (Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) and custom-made MR-compatible components. Here, we describe our experimental procedure in detail with consideration of alternatives (see Section “2.1 Equipment and procedures”), describe signal artifact sources inherent to concurrent TMS-fMRI (see Section “2.2 Signal artifacts in concurrent TMS-fMRI”), explain our artifact removal approach in post-processing (see Section “2.3 Preprocessing and artifact removal during analysis”), and present an experiment that illustrates these considerations (see Section “2.4 Experimental design”).

Riddle J., Scimeca J.M., Pagnotta M.F., Inglis B., Sheltraw D., Muse-Fisher C, & D’Esposito M. (2022). A guide for concurrent TMS-fMRI to investigate functional brain networks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 1050605.

+ Open protocol

+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!