The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Infinitylab poroshell 120 ec c18 column

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of analytes. It features a 120 Å pore size and a 2.7 μm particle size, which provide efficient and rapid separations. The column is made with a silica-based stationary phase and a sterically protected C18 surface chemistry, making it suitable for a variety of applications in analytical chemistry.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

45 protocols using infinitylab poroshell 120 ec c18 column

1

Quantifying Plant Hormones via UPLC-ESI-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
UPLC-ESI-MS/MS analysis was used to detect plant hormones in samples with an API 5500 triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometry detection system (AB Sciex, Massachusetts, MA, USA) that was equipped with an electrospray ionization (ESI) ion source and the Analyst 1.6.2 workstation. Using ESI, analytes were evaluated using the multi-reaction detection mode by negative ion scanning, which greatly improves sensitivity. Mass spectrometry parameters and methods such as the declustering potential and capillary electrophoresis were used to quickly screen and determine the ion pairs of target compounds under optimal conditions. The optimized mass spectrometry conditions were as follows: air curtain gas, 30; collision gas, 8; ion spray voltage, −3000 V; temperature, 500 °C; ion source gas, 1:35 and gas, 2:45.
An Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography System (Waters) was used for hormone detection. Compounds were separated on an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (100 × 3 mm, 2.7 μm), and the injection volume was 3 μL. Solvents included mobile phase A (0.1% formic acid in water) and mobile phase B (0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying PFOS in Water Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water samples were collected at 0 h (immediately after dosing) and 24 h (before treatment renewal) of exposure from each treatment and stored at −20 °C in a dark environment until analysis. All samples were analyzed using an Agilent Infinity II (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) liquid chromatography instrument attached to a SCIEX Triple Quad 5500+ LC-MS/MS (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). A Zorbax Diol (4.6 mm ID, 12.5 mm, 6 μm particle size) attached to an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (4.6 mm ID, 100 mm, 2.7 μm particle size) was used for separation of PFOS and each sample run with a ramping LC solvent gradient with methanol and nanopure water, each containing 20 mmol/L ammonium acetate. Two multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions were employed for each PFOS, one for quantitation and the other for confirmation of the PFOS. Measured PFOS treatment concentrations are available in the Supplementary Materials (Tables S2–S5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Degradation Analysis of DCF, SMT, and At

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The degradation mechanisms of DCF, SMT, and At were determined by HPLC–MS in an Agilent 1260 infinity II (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), equipped with a single quadrupole mass spectrometer (MS) detector InfinityLab LC/MSD-iQ (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to an API-Electrospray Source, working in positive and negative ion mode and analysing samples in a mass range of 10–400 m/z for SMT and 40–400 m/z for DCF and At. The identification of the degradation products of DCF and SMT was carried out with a mobile phase consisting of a mixture of a solution of 10% FA ACN: H2O (35:65) and in the case of At using a linear gradient (0–5 min), from a solution of 10% FA H2O:MeOH (95:5) to a solution of 10% FA H2O:MeOH (5:95). In both cases, the mobile phase was delivered at a flow rate of 0.5 mL·min−1 at 35 °C and using an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (2.1 × 150 mm; 2.7 Micron; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Preservatives in Water

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The water samples were collected and filtered by a 0.22 µm nylon syringe filter (ChromTech, Shanghai, China) and applied to HPLC analysis. The three preservatives were analyzed using an Agilent 1260 HPLC equipped with an InfinityLab PoroShell 120 EC-C18 column and monitored by a photodiode array detector at 254 nm (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The solvents delivered by the analytical pump were acetonitrile (A) and water (5 mM KH2PO4) (B). Samples were eluted by 40/60 (A/B) with a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The recovery percentages for BA, HB and DHA were 96.2, 95.3 and 95.6, respectively. The detection limits for the preservatives were 0.1 mg/L.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Lignin Monomers via UPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples taken from the acceptor side of the diffusion cells were first neutralized with HCl and then analyzed for vanillin, vanillic acid, and guaiacol in a Waters H-Class UPLC system using a method described in the literature [28 (link)]. A gradient method with water (A) and acetonitrile (B), both with 10 mM formic acid, was used to separate the lignin monomers in an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (100 × 4.6 mm, 4 μm). The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the gradient for acetonitrile (B) was as follows: 0 min 3%, 12 min 15%, 15 min 15%, 20 min 80%, 20.1 min 90%, 25 min 90%, 25.1 min 3%, and 35 min 3%. The injection volume was 3 µL and the column temperature 50 °C. Detection was performed using a PDA detector at 280 nm with baseline correction at 350–400 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

LC-MS Validation of Network Pharmacology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS) analysis were performed to validate whether the active compounds found by network pharmacology are actually existed in SH003. LC–MS analysis was conducted using a Waters TQD instrument. The reference component (four active compounds, 1.0 mg each) was weighed, dissolved in 1.0 mL of methanol to prepare a solution at a concentration of 1.0 mg/mL, then diluted. SH003 powder (10.0 mg) was weighed, sonicated in 1 mL of methanol for 10 min, and filtered through a 0.22 μm syringe filter. Chromatographic separation was achieved on an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.7 µm, Agilent) with a gradient elution profile using mobile phases A (0.1% Formic acid, 5 mM Ammonium Formate in Water) and B (0.1% Formic acid, 5 mM Ammonium Formate in Methanol). The gradient program commenced with 99% A at 0 min, transitioned to 20% A at 3 min, maintained this composition until 4 min, shifted to 1% A at 5 min, increased to 8% A at 8 min, returned to 99% A at 8.5 min, and persisted until the end of the 12-min analysis. The column temperature was maintained at 40 ℃, and the flow rate was set at 0.5 mL/min. Subsequent network pharmacology analysis was performed for the compounds validated via chromatography analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PFAS Detection in Water Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water samples were taken at 0 and 24 h of exposure from each treatment and stored at −20 °C in a dark environment until analysis. Due to the lengthy chromatographic method and large volume of solvent used per run, water samples were pooled from each replicate which resulted in one measurement per concentration. All samples were directly injected (10 µL) into an Agilent Infinity II (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) liquid chromatography instrument attached to a SCIEX Triple Quad 5500+ LC-MS/MS (SCIEX, Framingham, MA, USA). A Zorbax Diol (4.6 mm ID, 12.5 mm, 6 μm particle size) attached to an Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (4.6 mm ID, 100 mm, 2.7 μm particle size) was used for separation of PFAS and each sample run with a ramping LC solvent gradient with methanol and nanopure water, each containing 10 mmol/L ammonium acetate. A flow rate of 0.4 mL/min was used, and the column was maintained at room temperature. Two multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) transitions were employed for each PFAS, one for quantitation and the other for confirmation of the PFAS (Table S2). The PFAS water concentrations are available in the Supplementary Materials (Table S3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

HPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Diverse Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The extracts were
analyzed by high-performance
liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS)
on a Shimadzu LCMS-8060 triple quadrupole. The chromatographic method
for the Agilent InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (3 ×
100 mm, 2.7 μm) fitted with a guard column (3 × 5 mm, 2.7
μm) was based on gradient elution with acetonitrile (CHROMASOLV,
Honeywell; LC–MS grade) and water (LiChrosolv, Merck; LC–MS
grade) as the mobile phases and was previously used for the separation
of similar solutes.35 (link) The gradient program
began with 10% acetonitrile maintained for 0.5 min, succeeded by a
linear increase to 100% at 26 min mark; 100% acetonitrile was maintained
for 3 min, followed by rapid drop to 10% for column re-equilibration
for the next 6 min. In total, the gradient program took 35 min per
sample. Both mobile phases contained 0.1% formic acid, the total flow
rate was 300 μL min–1, the injection volume
was 0.7 μL, and the column temperature was maintained at 25.0
°C. The retention times and precursor–product ion transitions
are listed in Table S1 in the Supporting
Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analytical Purification and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An Ultimate 3000 Series Ultra-High Performance Liquid System (UPLC, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) coupled with an InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (10 × 0.21 cm, 1.9 μm, Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used to further purify the closed subfraction. The UPLC system was carried out using ultrapure water as eluent B and gradient of acetonitrile (containing 0.1% formic acid) as eluent A at a flow rate of 0.25 mL/min. The gradient for eluent A was 0–2.5 min, hold at 5%; 2.6–12.5 min, at 10%; 12.6–20 min, at 5%; 20–22 min, at 52.5%; 23–30 min, at 95.0%; and 31–35 min, at 5%. The peptide was automatically selected on basis of fragment information from the electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) analysis which was performed on a Q Exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Bremen, Germany) with mass range of 120–1800 m/z, full MS 35,000, ddMS2 17,500, and AGC target value of 1 e5. A De Novo™ software (Peak Studio 7.5, Bioinformatics Solutions, Inc., Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) was used to process the peptide sequence and molecular weight of the MS data [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Serum Amino Acid Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum amino acid concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry with the Q-life Lab 9000 mass spectrometer at Shenzhen Institute of Life and Health Medicine Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu, China). Serum samples were loaded and separated online using the InfinityLab Poroshell 120 EC-C18 column (2.1 mm × 100 mm, 2.7 μm; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, United States). The column temperature was set to 45 °C. The mobile phase consisted of 0.01% formic acid in water (solvent A) and acetonitrile (solvent B). The flow rate was 0.3 mL/min, and the injection volume was 2 μL. Gradient elution was used as follows: 0-1.5 min, 8% B; 3.5 min, 16% B; 6.5 min, 20% B; 8.0 min, 95% B; and 8.01-11.0 min, 8% B. The electrospray ionization settings were as follows: Capillary voltage, 3.5 kV; spray voltage, 300 V; drying gas temperature, 250 °C; drying gas flow rate, 7 L/min; sheath gas flow rate, 11 L/min; and sheath gas temperature, 250 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!