The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

74 protocols using uracil dna glycosylase

1

Assay of Bifunctional DNA Glycosylase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bifunctional DNA glycosylases have base removal glycosylase activity and AP lyase activity that leading to a break in the DNA backbone leaving a 5’-phosphate and either a 3’-UA, via α-elimination, or a 5’-phosphate via β,δ-elimination (Fig. 2A). To confirm the presence of glycosylase and AP lyase activity in AGOG, a 20 μ L reaction containing 20 nM 8oxoG:C dsDNA and 100 nM AGOG in 1x Thermopol Buffer was incubated at 65 °C for 30 min. For a β,δ-elimination positive control, the above reaction was performed with Fpg instead of AGOG. For a β-elimination positive control, 20 nM dU:G dsDNA and 100 nM of Uracil DNA glycosylase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and Endonuclease III (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) in IX Thermopol Buffer were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min [8 (link),46 (link)]. All reactions were quenched by the addition of equal volume of 85 % formamide and 50 mM EDTA, followed by dilution in water to bring the final concentration of DNA to 2 nM. A 3730x1 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems) was used for capillary electrophoresis and the resultant fluorescent peaks were analyzed using Peak Scanner software version 1.0 (Applied Biosystems) [42 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Strand-specific RNA-seq library preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strand-specific RNA-seq libraries were prepared as described previously2 (link). Briefly,5–9 μg total RNA isolated from PBMCs was used. The isolated messenger RNA was fragmented using RNA Fragmentation Reagents (Ambion) and uracil-containing complementary DNA in the second strand was synthesized using the SuperScript Double-Stranded cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher). The cDNA molecules were end-repaired with the Epicentre End-It DNA End-Repair Kit (Epicentre/Illumina), a deoxyadenosine base was added at the 3’ end of the fragments with the Klenow 3′ → 5′ exo- enzyme (New England Biolabs), and they were ligated with Illumina’s Paired-End Adaptor Oligo Mix (Part no. 1001782). The ligated libraries were size selected for an average insert size of 250 bp (2 mm gel slice) by agarose gel excision and extraction, and the uracil-containing second strands were digested with Uracil-DNA Glycosylase (New England Biolabs). The treated libraries were then amplified by PCR at the following conditions: 98 °C 30 sec, 15 cycles of (98 °C 10 sec, 65 °C 30 sec, 72 °C 30 sec), 72 °C 5 min. Each prepared library was sequenced on 1–3 HiSeq 2000 lanes (101 base paired-end).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying DNA Glycosylase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The nuclear fractions were incubated with 15 μL of 50 mM tris‐Cl (Sigma Life Science), 10 mM EDTA (Thermo Scientific), 10 pmol of the respective oligonucleotide (Microsynth, Supporting information Table S2), and 0.02 U of UDG (Uracil‐DNA Glycosylase, New England BioLabs) at 37°C for 2 h. Then, the samples were treated with 100 mM NaOH (Sigma Life Science) for 30 min at 37°C to break the DNA backbone at the abasic sites. To neutralize the reaction, 3 μL of 4 N HCl and 37 μL of 2 M tris‐Cl were added. Fluorescence was measured using a Cytation imaging reader (BioTek) with excitation at 490 nm and emission at 520 nm, and the data were analyzed with the Gen5 Software (BioTek).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Enzymatic Cleavage of Nucleic Acid Biochips

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lambda exonuclease, RNase H, RNase HII and uracil-DNA glycosylase were purchased from New England Biolabs and TURBO DNase from Invitrogen and were used at the recommended concentrations and with supplied buffers. RNase A was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and applied at 100 nM concentration in 0.1 M MES buffer. For each biochip cleavage assay, appropriate nucleic acid substrates were synthesized. In the case of double-stranded substrates, the biochip was synthesized with oligonucleotides capable of self-annealing to form hairpin-loop structures. Cleavage was detected through either the loss of fluorescence of Cy3-terminally labeled sequences, or loss of fluorescence from Cy3-labeled oligonucleotides hybridized to the nuclease substrate. In time course experiments, the enzymatic reaction was stopped by washing the surface followed by drying with argon.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

cDNA Synthesis and Illumina Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First-strand complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using random hexamer primers and M-MuLV reverse transcriptase (RNase H-) [73 (link)], with rRNA-depleted RNA used as a template. Second-strand cDNA was then synthesized with dNTPs, DNA polymerase I and RNase H. Next, T4 DNA polymerase and Klenow DNA polymerase were used to repair and modify the ends to add an A base and ligate the sequencing adapter. The cDNA products were then purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). Finally, uracil DNA glycosylase (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA) was used to degrade the U-containing chain to remove second-strand cDNA. The purified first-strand cDNA was enriched by PCR to obtain a cDNA library. The quality of the libraries was assessed using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, and sequencing was performed using paired-end sequencing (2*150 bp) with the Illumina HiSeq 4000 platform (LC Sciences, Houston, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Polymerase Fidelity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sequences of all synthetic DNA molecules used in this study were previously published [25 (link)]. The structures of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) templates (template A to G) are shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. The double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) templates were produced by annealing the ssDNA templates with their complementary oligos (“Top strand” in Fig. 1A) as described [25 (link)]. Yeast Pol δ (yPol δ; complex of Pol3-Pol31-Pol32 subunits, in which Pol32 was tagged with His6), human Pol η (hPol η) that was tagged with His6, yeast Pol ζ (yPol ζ; complex of Rev3-Rev7-Pol31-Pol32 subunits, in which Rev7 and Pol32 were tagged with FLAG and His6, respectively), and human Pol ι (hPol ι) that was tagged with His6, were purified as described [25 (link),37 (link),38 (link)]. Uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), T4 pyrimidine dimer glycosylase (PDG), and formamidopyrimidine(fapy)-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) were purchased form New England Biolabs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Oligonucleotide synthesis and biophysical analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA, USA), [γ-32P]-ATP (6000 Ci/mmol) was purchased from Perkin-Elmer, uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) and ϕ29 DNA polymerase were from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA, USA), C-18 Sep-Pak cartridges were purchased from Waters (Milford, MA, USA), and BS Poly-prep columns were obtained from BioRad (Hercules, CA, USA). Acrylamide/bis-acrylamide 19:1 (40% solution, electrophoresis grade) was purchased from Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA), spermine and all other chemical reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). A mixture of the four 2’-deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI, USA). Iron–EDTA–H2O2 footprinting (51 (link)–53 (link)), QTOF-MS (53 (link)–55 (link)), LC–MS/MS (53 (link),55 (link)) and phi-29 (ϕ29) DNA polymerase primer extension reactions (56 (link)) were conducted as described in published procedures, with minor modifications. Detailed experimental protocols for these experiments are provided in the Supplementary Data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Mitochondrial Mutation Frequencies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To characterize the frequencies of random mutations in RASFC and synovial biopsy samples, we used the mitochondrial Random Mutation Capture assay as described previously73 (link). Mitochondrial DNA was extracted using a previously reported protocol21 (link). Following extraction, 10 μg of mtDNA was digested with 100 units of Taq αI restriction enzyme (New England Biolabs), 1X bovine serum albumin, and a Taq αI–specific digestion buffer (10 mM Tris HCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl [pH 8.4]) for 10 hrs, with 100units of Taq αI added to the reaction mixture every hour. PCR amplification was performed in 25 μl reaction mixtures containing 12.5 μl 2X SYBR Green Brilliant Mastermix (Stratagene), 0.1 μl uracil DNA glycosylase (New England Biolabs), 0.7 μl forward and reverse primers (10pM/μl; IDT), and 6.7 μl H2O. The samples were amplified using a Roche LightCycler 480, according to the following protocol; 37 °C for 10 mins, 95 °C for 10 mins, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 15secs and 60 °C for 1 min. Samples were kept at 72 °C for 7 mins and following melting-curve analysis, immediately stored at −80 °C. The primer sequences used were as follows: for mtDNA copy number 5′-ACAGTTTATGTAGCTTACCTCC-3′ (forward) and 5′-TTGCTGCGTGCTTGATGCTTGT-3′ (reverse); for random mutations 5′-CCTCAACAGTTAAATCAACAAAACTGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCGCTTACTTTGTAGCCTTCA-3′ (reverse).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Detecting mtDNA Mutations and Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
mtDNA mutation frequency was detected by random mutation capture assay as described in our published article (Wu et al., 2015 (link)). In summary, two primer pairs were designed for PCR reactions. One is flanking the Taq1 sites at mtDNA positions 1427 and 8335, the other primer pair does not flank a TaqI restriction sites as controls. PCR amplification was performed in 25 μL reactions, containing 2 μL of 10 μM forward and reverse primers, 0.2 μL of uracil DNA glycosylase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA), 12.5 μL 2× Brilliant SYBR Green I Master Mix (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA) and 3.3 μL H2O. Then the PCR product was digested with TaqI restriction enzyme and the mtDNA mutation frequency was determined by analysis of the band size of gel electrophoresis. The mutation frequency was showed as the mutation number per million bases.
LX-PCR assay was performed to determine DNA damage using GeneAmp XL PCR kit (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) as previously described (Wu et al., 2015 (link)). DNA damage was quantified by comparing the ratio between the long and short fragments of PCR amplicons (mtDNA = 210 bp/13.4 kb).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis and Characterization of DNA Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 37bp duplex DNA substrates used for EMSA experiments were prepared by annealing single stranded oligos at 95°C for 5 minutes and then cooled to room temperature for 1 hour by turning off the heating device. The AP37 duplex DNA was prepared through reaction with Uracil DNA glycosylase (NEB, USA).
The following oligonucleotides were used:
UD37: 5’CCG AGT CAT TCC TGC AGC GAG TCC ATG GGA GTC AAA T 3’ and 6FAM-5’- ATT TGA CTC CCA TGG ACT CGC TGC AGG AAT GAC TCG G-3’ (IDT, USA)
THF37: 5’CCG AGT CAT TCC TGC AGC GXG TCC ATG GGA GTC AAA T-3’-6FAM and 5’-ATT TGA CTC CCA TGG ACT CGC TGC AGG AAT GAC TCG G-3’, where X represents Tetrahydrofuran (IDT, USA)
CPD37: 5’-CCG AGT CAT TCC TGC AGC GAY CCA TGG GAG TCA AAT-3’ (Y=CPD) and 6FAM-5’-ATT TGA CTC CCA TGG AAT CGC TGC AGG AAT GAC TCG G-3’, where Y represents a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (Trilink, USA)
8-oxoG37(G:C): 5’-CCG AGT CAT TCC TGC AGC GAZ TCC ATG GGA GTC AAA-3’-FldT and 5’-ATT TGA CTC CCA TGG ACT CGC TGC AGG AAT GAC TCG G-3’, where Z represents 8-oxoG (Midland Certified Reagent Co, USA)
8-oxoG37(G:A): 5’-CCG AGT CAT TCC TGC AGC GAZ TCC ATG GGA GTC AAA T-3’ and 5’-A TTT GAC TCC CAT GGA ATC GCT GCA GGA ATG ACT CGG-3’-6FAM, where Z represents 8-oxoG (Trilink, USA)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!