The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Quanta 250 esem

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Quanta 250 ESEM is a high-resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM) designed for advanced materials analysis. It features a field emission gun (FEG) source, providing high-quality images with a resolution down to 1.2 nm. The Quanta 250 ESEM operates in both high and low-vacuum modes, allowing for the examination of a wide range of samples, including those that are sensitive to standard high-vacuum conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using quanta 250 esem

1

Murine Incisor Microstructure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The upper and lower murine incisors of 3.5 months-old Ltbp3−/− and WT mice were dissected out of the alveolar bone. After rinsing with distilled water, teeth were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, transferred in a solution of propylene oxide/epon resin (1:1 v/v), and embedded in Epon 812 (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France). The teeth were sectioned into two halves along their sagittal axes using a water-cooled diamond circular saw (Bronwill Scientific, Rochester, NY, USA) and both surfaces were polished with diamond paste (Escil, Chassieu, France). One half was etched with a 20% (w/v) citric acid solution for 2 min, rinsed with distilled water, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions and left to dry at room temperature. The samples were coated with a gold-palladium alloy using a Hummer Jr sputtering device (Technics, CITY????, CA, USA). Scanning electron microscope assessments were performed with a Quanta 250 ESEM (FEI Company, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) operating with an accelerating voltage of the electrons of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing Fungal Infection on Wheat Leaves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary leaf blades were excised from wheat seedlings 24 h after fenpicoxamid treatment and the cut ends were sandwiched between two layers of potato dextrose agar, the upper layers having been prepared from the middle section of agar using a scalpel (Fig. 2). This allowed the excised leaves to remain hydrated and green over the course of the experiment. Zones to receive inoculum (ca 1 µL droplets) were then delineated with a permanent marker to facilitate sample imaging. After inoculation, Petri plates were covered to prevent evaporation of the inoculum droplets, and spores were allowed to settle onto leaf surfaces for 1 h. Residual surface liquid was wicked away using a Kimwipe™ in order to avoid deposition of residues that accompanied complete evaporation and caused some obscuring of both surface leaf detail and spores. After 72 h, leaves were removed from the agar plates, mounted on a Peltier stage and imaged at 3 °C and 4.5 torr on a FEI Quanta 250 ESEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Micrographs were manually colorized using the GNU Image Manipulation Program (GIMP, v2.8) to emphasize the fungal tissue on the surface of the leaves and to balance contrast between panels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Mouse Incisors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The lower incisors of 7 week-old control and RA-treated mice were dissected out of the alveolar bone, rinsed, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and then transferred in a propylene oxide/epon resin (v/v) solution. After embedding the teeth in Epon 812 (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France), they were sectioned sagittally and polished with diamond pastes (Escil, Chassieu, France). The embedded half incisors were etched with a 20% (m/v) citric acid solution for 2 min, rinsed with distilled water, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol and dried at room temperature. The samples were then coated with a gold-palladium alloy using a HUMMER JR sputtering device (Technics, CA, USA) before performing scanning electron microscopy with a Quanta 250 ESEM (FEI Company, Eindhoven, The Netherlands) with an accelerating voltage of the electrons of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterizing Mg-based Micromotors via SEM-EDX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images of Mg-based micromotors were obtained with an FEI Quanta 250 ESEM instrument, using an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. EDX mapping analysis was performed using an Oxford EDX detector attached to SEM instrument and operated by Pathfinder software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Scanning Electron Microscopy Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The mrLhCG28-CG, mrLhCG28-OI, OsLhCG-CGCC, and OsLhCG-OI samples were fixed in at 4 °C for 12 h after thorough rinsing. Subsequently, dehydration was carried out using a graded ethanol series, followed by complete drying using a critical point dryer (CPD) for further processing. The dried samples were then subjected to surface sputter coating and affixed to the sample stage using conductive adhesive tape for surface morphological characterization using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (FEI Quanta 250 e-SEM). The SEM electron beam accelerating voltage utilized was 15 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

SEM Imaging of Mineral-Loaded Micromotors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM imaging of a mineral-loaded micromotor was obtained with an FEI Quanta 250 ESEM instrument, using an acceleration voltage of 10 kV. EDX mapping analysis was performed using an Oxford EDX detector attached to the SEM instrument and operated by Pathfinder software. For additional characterization, iron(II) gluconate hydrate or sodium selenate decahydrate were loaded in chitosan layers further labeled with FITC (λex=492 nm/ λem=520 nm, Sigma-Aldrich, 46945) or Rh-6G (λex=524 nm/ λem=547 nm, Sigma-Aldrich, R4127) fluorescent dyes, respectively. Brightfield and fluorescent images of the mineral-loaded motors were captured using an Invitrogen EVOS FL microscope coupled with a 10× and 40× microscope objectives using the GFP and RFP fluorescence filters for green and red excitation, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Material Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology
was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using the FEI QUANTA
250 ESEM operated at 15.00 kV. For the elemental analysis, an EDAX
detector connected to the SEM instrument was used. The powder XRD
studies were performed on an XRD 6000 instrument, Shimadzu, with Cu
Kα radiation λ = 1.5418 Å. For the UV–vis
spectroscopic analysis, a SPECORD PLUS double beam spectrophotometer
was used, and for the FTIR spectroscopy studies, a PerkinElmer FTIR
instrument was used, where the samples were prepared using the KBr
pellet method (wavenumber range used was 4000–400 cm–1). Also, for the zeta-potential studies, the Malvern zeta sizer 2000
& Mastersizer Micro instrument was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Ultrastructural Analysis of Tendon Biopsies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biopsy samples were prepared for electron microscopy as described previously (Starborg et al., 2013 (link)). In brief, 1×1×1 mm cubes of tendon were immersed in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde prepared in 100 mM cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), and processed using a double osmium protocol that is suitable for transmission electron microscopy and scanning block face-scanning electron microscopy (Starborg et al., 2013 (link)). Semi-thin (~1 μm thick) sections were prepared, stained with toluidine blue and examined using a dissecting microscope to determine the orientation of the tendon within the biopsies. The resin blocks were trimmed for transverse sectioning (i.e. 90° to the tendon long axis). Ultrathin sections (70 nm-thick) were prepared and fibril diameter measurements were made using a FEI BioTwin transmission electron microscope. Resin blocks were trimmed and images were collected using an FEI Quanta 250 ESEM equipped with a Gatan 3View® for in-chamber ultramicrotome sectioning and image acquisition, as described previously (Starborg et al., 2013 (link)). Typically, 500–1000 × 100 nm-thick cuts were removed from the blocks during the imaging procedure and image analysis and model reconstruction was performed using IMOD (Kremer et al., 1996 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Acellular Nerve

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscopy was performed in the Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Shared Resource. Axial cross-sections of representative acellular nerve samples were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4). The specimens were post-fixed with 1% OsO4 solution in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4) for 2 h, dehydrated through a graded ethanol series in PBS, and sputter coated with 3.5 μm of gold. Quanta 250 ESEM (FEI, Hillsboro, OR) was used to capture surface images at 300× to 3000×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Scanning Electron Microscopy of Murine Incisors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The upper and lower murine incisors of 3.5‐month‐old Ltbp3‐/‐ and WT mice were dissected out of the alveolar bone. After rinsing with distilled water, the teeth were dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, transferred in a solution of propylene oxide/epon resin (1:1, vol/vol), and embedded in Epon 812 (Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France). The teeth were sectioned into two halves along their sagittal axes using a water‐cooled diamond circular saw (Bronwill Scientific, Rochester, NY, USA), and both surfaces were polished with diamond paste (Escil, Chassieu, France). One‐half was etched with a 20% (wt/vol) citric acid solution for 2 min, rinsed with distilled water, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol solutions and left to dry at room temperature. The samples were coated with a gold‐palladium alloy using a Hummer Jr sputtering device (Technics, Union City, CA, USA). Scanning electron microscopy assessments were performed using a Quanta 250 ESEM (FEI Company, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) operating with an accelerating voltage of electrons of 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!