The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Reducing sample buffer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

Reducing sample buffer is a laboratory reagent used to prepare samples for analysis by disrupting protein-protein interactions and denaturing proteins. It contains reducing agents, such as dithiothreitol (DTT) or beta-mercaptoethanol, which break disulfide bonds within proteins, allowing them to unfold and be analyzed more effectively.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

35 protocols using reducing sample buffer

1

Immunoprecipitation and Stability Analysis of EphA4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunoprecipitation experiments, 1 μg of EphA4 LBD, hEphA4-Fc (R&D Systems, Abingdon, UK), and mEphA4-Fc (R&D Systems) were boiled for 10 min in reducing sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and proteins were separated in a 4–12% Bis-Tris SDS-PAGE gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After SDS-PAGE, the gel was transferred to Immobilon-P membrane (Merck Millipore, Overijse, Belgium) and subsequently blocked with 10% Blotting-grade blocker (Bio-Rad) for 1 h at room temperature. One μg Nb and mouse anti-HA antibody 1/1000 (clone 16B12, MMS-101P-200, lot D13FF01646, Covance) were used to detect EphA4. To determine Nb stability, 10 ng of Nbs were denatured with reducing sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and separated in a 12% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE gel. The gel was transferred to Immobilon-P membrane, which was afterward blocked as described above. To detect the Nbs, 1/1000 anti-HA antibody (clone C29F4, 3724S, lot 8, Cell Signaling) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Inflammatory Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in RIPA Lysis Buffer (Santa Cruz) and heat-denatured in reducing sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were separated on 4%–20% polyacrylamide gradient gels (BioRad) and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Non-specific binding was blocked with 5% skim milk, and membranes were probed with primary antibodies to IL-1β (1:1,000; 12507S, Cell Signaling), Nlrp3 (1:500; NBP2-12446, Novus), HIF-1α (1:500; NB100-449, Novus), α-tubulin (1:2,000; 2125S, Cell Signaling), and ASC (1:1,000; sc-22514-R, Santa Cruz), followed by incubation with anti-rabbit-HRP (1:10,000; sc-2030, Santa Cruz) and Clarity western ECL substrate (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Caco-2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Caco-2 monolayers were washed once in situ with Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS), and the cells were lysed and removed from the Transwell filter with 50 μL RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher), supplemented with Halt Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail, EDTA-free (ThermoFisher). After homogenization by vortexing, the lysates were mixed with reducing sample buffer (ThermoFisher) and boiled for 5 minutes. Proteins were fractionated on a 12% or 14% polyacrylamide gel by electrophoresis and electrotransferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Immobilon-PSQ polyvinylidene difluoride; Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA). The immunoblot was developed using the same antibodies as immunofluorescence staining and IRDye 800CW donkey anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (H + L) (LI-COR, Lincoln, NE). The membrane was scanned with an Odyssey Imaging system (LI-COR), and the protein concentration in each band was quantified with Image Studio Lite software (LI-COR). The densitometric intensity of each target protein was normalized to the intensity of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase loading control (mouse anti-human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase clone 6C5; Millipore Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

SDS-PAGE Protein Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantified samples were separated by SDS-PAGE using a total of 2 gels. A random subset of 8 samples and a universal control were loaded on one gel, and a random subset of 7 samples and a universal control were loaded on the other. Reducing sample buffer (5×; Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL) was added to each sample in a 1:5 ratio to 49 μg of sample plus 1 μg of Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAPDH (Sigma-Aldrich), and the mixture was heated at 90°C for 3 min. The S. cerevisiae GAPDH was added to verify the efficiencies of subsequent digestion and TMT-labeling steps across samples. After cooling to room temperature, the samples were loaded onto a precast 12% polyacrylamide gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Proteins were separated through electrophoresis, which was run for 15 min at 200 V. Gels were stained in Coomassie blue (Bio-Rad) overnight, and gel images were obtained from scanning before excision.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunoprecipitation of STAT6 and Foxp3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naïve CD4+Foxp3 T cells (WT or Stat6−/−) were polarized under iTreg-polaring conditions (TGF-β plus IL-2) plus GITR costimulation, and 24 or 48 hours later cells (1 × 107 cells) were collected in IP lysis buffer (87788; Thermo Scientific). Subsequently, cell lysate was incubated with 5µg anti-STAT6 (SC-981X), anti-p50 (sc-1192; both from Santa Cruz Technology) or purified goat IgG (02-6202; Life Technologies) at 4°C overnight and then with Protein G agarose beads (16–201, 40µl; EMD Millipore) for additional 4 hours. The agarose beads were collected by centrifugation and then washed 4 times with IP lysis buffer. Proteins were eluted in reducing sample buffer (39000; Thermo Scientific) and analyzed by immunoblot. FLAG-Foxp3 retrovirus was transduced into naïve CD4+Foxp3 T cells (1 × 107 cells) polarized under iTreg-culturing condition with GITR costimulation, and 48 hours later, cells were collected and processed as above except that anti-FLAG antibody (F1804; Sigma-Aldrich) and normal mouse IgG (sc-2025; Santa Cruz Technology) were used for immunoprecipitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

IFNAR1 Expression in Mtb-Stimulated BMDMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMDMs were either stimulated with Mtb antigens for 1 day or left unstimulated, lysed in RIPA Lysis Buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and heat denatured in reducing sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were separated in 4% to 20% polyacrylamide gradient gels (Bio-Rad) and transferred onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were probed with primary antibodies against IFNAR1 (R&D, Cat#AF3039), and GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Cat# SC-25778) followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated anti–rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and developed by Clarity Western ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Inflammatory Response Assay Reagents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tryptic soy broth (TSB), N-acetylmuramic acid, TRI Reagent, l-benzoyl-Arg-pNA (l-BApNA), and Tos-Gly-Pro-Lys-pNA (Tos-GPK-pNA) substrates, gentamicin, LPS from Escherichia coli O111:B4, lipoteichoic acid (LTA), and carboxymethylcelullose were from Sigma-Aldrich. Yeast extract, l-cysteine, hemin, and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were from BioShop Canada, Inc. Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline without Ca2+ and Mg2+ (PBS), fetal bovine serum (FBS), RPMI 1640, the BCA protein assay kit, reducing sample buffer, Hoechst 33342 stain, eosin, and decalcifier were from Thermo Fisher Scientific. Menadione was from ICN Biomedicals, KYT-1 and KYT-36 from PeptaNova, and saponin from Serva Electrophoresis GmbH. Toll-like receptor agonists were obtained as follows: Pam3CSK4, flagellin, and R848 from Enzo Life Sciences, macrophage-activating lipopeptide (MALP-2) from Imgenex, CpG ODN 2006 from Hycult Biotech, and human recombinant IL-1β from BioLegend. Their purity was estimated for CpG 85% (high-performance liquid chromatograph [HPLC]), flagellin 95% (SDS-PAGE), LPS 80%, MALP-2 95% (HPLC), and LTA 97%, according to the manufacturer’s statement. All agonists, except LPS, were endotoxin free.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Histone Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and collected using the EpiQuik Total Histone Extraction Kit (EpiGentek). Protein concentrations were determined using the micro BCA kit (Thermo-Fisher Scientific) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Protein samples were supplemented with reducing sample buffer (Thermo Scientific) and denaturized by incubating at 95 °C for 5 min. The nonspecific binding was blocked by incubation of the PVDF membrane in 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA), diluted in Tris Buffered Saline Tween (TBST, 50 mM TRIS, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20 (Applichem) for 1 h at room, temperature followed by incubation with primary antibodies overnight. The antibodies, diluted in TBST, were directed against α-tubulin (1:5000, T6199, Sigma-Aldrich), acetylated α-tubulin (1:5000, T6793 monoclonal, Sigma-Aldrich), histone H3 acetyl k9+k14 (1:1000, 9677L, Cell Signaling), and histone 4 (1:1000, ab10158, Abcam). Secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Dako, 1:5000, 1 h, RT) where used prior to detection with ECL substrate (life technologies) with a LAS 4000 Image Analyzer (GE Healthcare). Luminescent signals were quantified with ImageQuant TL 7.0 software (GE Healthcare) and then graphed with GraphPad Prism software. A mild reblotting buffer (Merck Millipore Corp.) was applied to strip the blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunoprecipitation of FLAG-RelB in Th17 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Naive CD4+Foxp3 T cells were transduced with retroviral vector expressing FLAG-RelB, and polarized under Th17 condition for 48 hrs. Cells (15 × 106 cells) were collected in IP lysis buffer (87788; Thermo Scientific). Subsequently, cell lysate was incubated with 10ug anti-FLAG (F1804; Sigma-Aldrich) or control antibody (ab18414; Abcam) at 4° C overnight, followed by incubation with Protein A agarose beads (9863; Cell Signaling Technology) for additional 4hr. Beads were collected by centrifugation and washed 4 times with IP lysis buffer. Proteins were eluted in reducing sample buffer (39000; Thermo Scientific) and analyzed by immunoblot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of IRS1 and β-actin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RIPA buffer (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) containing Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (GenDEPOT) was used for cell lysis. Cell lysates were boiled with lane markers in reducing sample buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The proteins in cell lysates were separated via SDS/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then transferred to a PVDF membrane. The membrane was then blocked for 1 h with 5% skim milk/Tris-buffered saline and Tween 20 (TBST). Next, the membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with a primary antibody (diluted 1:1000 in 5% skim milk/TBST). The membrane was washed three times with TBST buffer and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5000 in 5% skim milk/TBST). Finally, the membrane was washed three times with TBST buffer and incubated with West-Q Pico ECL solution and West-Q Femto clean ECL solution (GeneDEPOT, Baker, TX, USA). Anti-IRS1 (Cell Signaling Technology, Trask Lane Danvers, MA, USA) and anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) were used as primary antibodies. HRP-conjugated antirabbit IgG or HRP-conjugated anti mouse IgG were used as secondary antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!