The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using duolink in situ reagents

1

Duolink In Situ Proximity Ligation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLA experiments were done using Duolink In Situ reagents (Olink Bioscience)[26 (link)], see supplementay material for details.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Situ Protein Interaction Mapping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ PLA was done with Duolink In Situ Reagents from Olink Bioscience (Sigma) per the provider’s protocol. Cell cultures were plated on glass coverslips and fixed for 10 min at room temperature in 3% paraformaldehyde. Cells were blocked with Duolink blocking solution, incubated overnight with two primary antibodies from different host species (one mouse and one rabbit antibody), and incubated with Duolink anti-mouse plus and anti-rabbit minus PLA probes. Probes contain unique DNA strands that template the hybridization of added oligonucleotides. After ligation and amplification, coverslips were mounted with Invitrogen ProLong Gold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Proximity Ligation Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PLA assay was performed using the Duolink in situ reagents (Olink Biosciences) in according with the manufacturer’s specifications. The cells were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. After blocking with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.5% BSA dissolved in PBS, the cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies. Following incubation with Duolink PLA anti-rabbit Plus and anti-mouse Minus probes (1:5 dilution, Olink Bioscience) at 37 °C for 1 h, ligation, rolling circle amplification, and detection were performed using the Duolink In Situ Detection Reagents Red (Olink Bioscience). Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI. PLA signals were documented by a Leica SP8 confocal microscope and quantified by using cell image analysis software CellProfiler63 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In situ Proximity Ligation Assay in NHK Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ PLA was performed with DuoLink In Situ Reagents from Olink Bioscience (Sigma-Aldrich). NHK cells were seeded onto glass coverslips coated with rat-tail type I collagen (20 μg ml−1 in PBS, BD Biosciences), grown for 24 h in complete FAD medium, and fixed in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (Sigma) for 10 min at room temperature. PLAs were performed as indicated by the provider's protocol, after an overnight incubation with primary antibodies following the immunofluorescence protocol described above. Primary antibodies are listed in Supplementary Data 13.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein-Protein Interaction Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The in situ PLA analysis was performed using Duolink® in situ reagents (O-LINK® Bioscience, Uppsala, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were transfected with plasmids or siRNAs and then seeded on glass coverslips in 24-well cell culture plates (1 × 105 cells/well). After 24 h growth under standard conditions, cells were treated with EGF (25 ng/mL) in the presence or absence of peptides and each reagent for 15 min in a CO2 incubator at 37 °C, and then washed twice with 1X PBS. Cells were fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PBS for 10 min at room temperature (RT), and subsequently washed twice with 1X PBS, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS, and then washed twice with wash buffer A. Cells were incubated with blocking solution at 37 °C for 30 min, and then washed twice with wash buffer A. Cells were stained with specific antibodies (1:100 for in situ PLA) as indicated. Protein–protein interactions were analyzed using a confocal laser scanning microscope Olympus FluoView FV1000 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). PLA signals in cell populations (n = 4) were quantified by NIS-Elements analysis, and four or two independent experiments were performed. The average number of rolling-circle products (RCPs) per cell ± standard error is shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

In Situ Protein-Protein Interaction Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Interactions between two molecules were determined using in situ PLA (Duolink® In Situ reagents, O-LINK® Bioscience, Sweden) as described previously (Lee et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, cells were plated onto round coverslips in 24-well cell culture plates and grown for 24 h in complete DMEM. The cells were serum-starved for 6 h in DMEM with 0.1% BSA, then pretreated with each reagent as indicated (TNFR2-SKE for 0.5 h, DEXamethasone (DEX; Sigma, USA) for 3 h, or dehydroascorbic acid (DHA; Sigma, USA) for 1 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator). The cells were additionally stimulated with TNF-α (25 or 50 ng/ml), followed by washing twice with 1× PBS. Cells were fixed with 2% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. All procedures for in situ PLA were performed according to the manufacturer’s recommended protocol and protein-protein interactions were analyzed using a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Olympus FluoView FV1000, Olympus, Japan). We used antibodies against the following target proteins: TNFR1, TRAF2, NF-κB/p50 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and NF-κB/p65 (Cell Signaling Technology).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of RARγ and YAP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown on Lab-Tek chamber slides (Nunc), fixed with 4% PFA, and permeabilized with 0.2% saponin (w/v, Sigma) in the presence of 3% BSA, w/v (Sigma). Cells were incubated with anti-RARg (H-6, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and anti-YAP antibodies (D8H1X, Cell Signaling Technology) overnight at room temperature. Then, slides were washed 3 times in D-PBS buffer containing Mg þþ / Ca þþ before addition of the Duolink In Situ reagents (Olink Bioscience) as described by the manufacturer's instructions. Slides were then exposed to the mounting medium containing DAPI and visualized with a Carl Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope. Images were captured and analyzed with the ZEN software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PLA Assay for Protein-Protein Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PLA experiments were done using Duolink In Situ reagents (Olink Bioscience). WT and CFTR-KO cholangiocytes seeded on collagen I coated coverslips were fixed with 3.7% PFA, washed using PBS/10mM glycine, and permeabilized with PBS/TritonX-100 0.2%. Cells were incubated with blocking solution (Olink Bioscience) for 30 minutes and then with one (negative control) or two primary antibodies for 1h at RT.
Coverslips were then incubated with secondary antibodies linked to PLA oligonucleotide probes PLUS and MINUS (Olink Bioscience) for 1 h at 37 °C. The samples were then incubated with the ligation ligase solution for 30 min at 37 °C to hybridize oligonucleotides tagged on probes. The coverslips were then incubated with the amplification polymerase solution for 100 min at 37 °C to amplify hybridized oligonucleotides and fluorescently label (Alexa-Fluor 488) the amplification products. Cells were then stained with rhodamine conjugate phalloidin for 20 minutes and coverslips were mounted on slides with Duolink In Situ Mounting Medium with DAPI. Imaging was done using a Zeiss LSM 710 Duo confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Interaction Analysis by In Situ PLA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ PLA was used to evaluate protein interactions. Briefly, cells were seeded in 96-well microtiter plates (0.5–1 × 104/well) and treated as described above. Cells were then washed in PBS, fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS, permeabilized with PBS 0.2%Tween-20 (PBS-T) and blocked with 2% BSA in PBS-T. PLA pre-qualified rabbit anti-ErbB2 antibody (Sigma Aldrich) was used together with one of the following primary antibodies, according to the protein interaction analyzed: mouse anti-Cdc37 (Santa Cruz Biot), mouse anti-HSP70 (Sigma Aldrich) or mouse anti-HSP90 (abcam). The PLA reactions were performed using Duolink® In Situ reagents, from Olink® Bioscience, according to manufacturer's instructions. Nuclei were stained with Duolink In Situ Microplate Nuclear Stain, Anti-Fade reagent (Sigma Aldrich). Fluorescence images were acquired by the High Content Screening (HCS) system Operetta and analysed with Harmony software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proximity Ligation Assay for VEGFR Phosphorylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proximity ligation assays were performed to determine tyrosine phosphorylation of VEGFRs or protein interactions (Soderberg et al, 2006) according to the manufacturer's protocol using the Duolink in situ reagents (Olink Bioscience). The following antibodies were used on embryonic sections: goat anti‐mouse VEGFR3 (R&D Systems, AF743), rabbit anti‐mouse VEGFR2 clone 55B11 (Cell Signaling, 2479), mouse anti‐phospho‐tyrosine 4G10 Platinum (Millipore, 05‐1050) and rat anti‐mouse β1 integrin clone MB1.2 (Millipore, MAB1997). The following antibodies were used for in vitro PLA studies: goat anti‐human VEGFR3 (R&D Systems, AF349) and mouse anti‐human β1 integrin (Millipore, MAB1987). Co‐stainings were performed using rabbit anti‐mouse Lyve‐1 (Abcam, ab14917) or Alexa Fluor®488 phalloidin (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher, A12379). Secondary antibodies conjugated with AF488 (Molecular Probes) were used, as well as DAPI (Sigma) to counterstain cell nuclei. All images were acquired using Laser Scan Microscopy (LSM 710, Zeiss) and analysed using the ImageJ software. PLA dots were normalised to the number of LECs or to the Lyve1‐positive area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!