The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti foxm1 antibody

Manufactured by Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Sourced in United States

The Anti-FOXM1 antibody is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and analysis of the FOXM1 protein. FOXM1 is a transcription factor that plays a role in cell proliferation and cell cycle regulation. The antibody can be used in various immunoassay techniques, such as western blotting and immunohistochemistry, to identify and quantify the presence of FOXM1 in biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using anti foxm1 antibody

1

Western Blot Analysis of Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed by normalization to β-actin or the baseline expression level. Cells were lysed with IP lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) containing protease inhibitor cocktail III (Millipore, Billerica, MA). The proteins were separated by electrophoresis using 4-20% or 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel, and transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were incubated with the first antibody, respectively: anti-TOPK antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-FOXM1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), anti-HA (Roche), or anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich). Finally, the membrane was incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and protein bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence detection reagents (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh, PA). We generated mouse anti-MELK monoclonal antibodies using partial recombinant MELK protein (264-601 amino acids of MELK) as an immunogen by the methods as described previously [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ChIP-qPCR for Chromatin Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatin was prepared from mouse β-cell lines and human islets. Briefly, β-cell cells or islets were fixed in 1% formaldehyde, and quenched in glycine. Cells were washed with PBS and lysed in cold lysis buffer with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Sigma). Cells were then sonicated using 25% of power, 10-s on/off pulses for a total of 3 min (Branson digital sonifier). Immunoprecipitations were performed using control rabbit IgG (Cell Signaling #9649), anti-FoxM1 antibody (Santa Cruz, sc-502X), anti-mouse CENP-A antibody (Cell Signaling #2047), or anti-human CENP-A antibody (Abcam, ab33565). The ChIP qPCR was performed with the primers described in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Endometrial FoxM1 Expression in Recurrent Implantation Failure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endometrial tissues from three RIF subjects and fifteen various staged controls were examined. Immunostaining was performed as described previously24 (link). The endometrial tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma) and then embedded in paraffin. After deparaffinization, rehydration, antigen retrieval, inhibition of endogenous peroxidase activity, and blocking, sections were incubated with anti-FoxM1 antibody (1:500, Santa Cruz) overnight. HESCs cultured in chamber slides were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde followed by permeabilization and blocking. Incubations with the respective primary antibodies including anti-FoxM1 (1:200, Santa Cruz), anti-cyclin B1 (1:600, Abcam) and anti-phospho-histone 3 (pH3, 1:200, CST) were performed overnight at 4°C. Fluorescence (cyanine 3)-conjugated secondary antibodies were used respectively to visualize the signal and nuclei were stained with DAPI (1 μg/ml, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

FOXM1 Protein Expression in Angiosarcoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Angiosarcoma cells were incubated with lysis buffer (Complete Lysis-M, Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The lysate protein concentration was measured using a BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Equal amounts of protein (20 µg) were dissolved in NuPage LDS Sample Buffer (Invitrogen) and 10% NuPage Sample Reducing Agent (Invitrogen). Lysates were boiled at 98°C for 2 minutes and loaded and run on 4-12% NuPage Bis-Tris Gels (Invitrogen) at 200 V for 40 minutes. The proteins were transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Invitrogen) and blocked in 2% bovine serum albumin in 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich) and Tris-buffered saline. The membranes were probed with anti-FOXM1 antibody (1:100, Santa Cruz) overnight at 4°C. The secondary antibody used was anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase-conjugated IgG antibody. Anti-human actin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:4000, Millipore) was used as a loading control. Protein bands were detected using the ImageQuant LAS 4000 system (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluation of FOXM1 and miR-552 Expression in PDAC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The human 293T cell line and pancreatic cancer tissue microarrays (Cat#: HPan-Ade180Sur-02) which contain 73 pairs of PDAC samples and adjacent normal tissues were obtained from Shanghai Outdo Biotech, China. Immunohistochemical staining for FOXM1 and in situ hybridization for miR-552 were respectively performed according to the commercial protocol (Outdo Biotech, Shanghai, China) using anti-FOXM1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) or 3' and 5' DIG labeled LNA miR-552 probes (Ambion, USA). All the samples were identified by two experienced pathologists independently blinded to the clinical data. The following expression levels were based on the score obtained by the intensity and percentage of the positive staining. The intensity was recorded as 0, 1, 2, and 3 referring to negative, weak, moderate, and strong staining, respectively. Grade 0, 1, 2 group were classified as 'low expression' while grade 3 group were classified as 'high expression'. The research on the use of human tissue samples was approved by the Medical Ethics Committees of Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

FOXM1 Regulation of pri-miR-552 Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PANC1 cells (1×107) were prepared for ChIP assay. ChIP experiments were performed with chromatin immunoprecipitation assay kit (Millipore, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cell sediments were crosslinked with 1% formaldehyde for 15 mins. Crosslinked chromatin was sonicated and incubated with 5 μg anti-FOXM1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA) at 4 °C overnight. Co-precipitated DNA was analyzed using PCR to amplify a 133-bp region of pri-miR-552 promoter and PCR products were resolved electrophoretically on a 2% agarose gel. Also, the immunoprecipitated DNA was quantitated by real-time PCR to measure FOXM1 binding levels, which were normalized to 2% input. Isotype-matched IgG (5 μg) was used as a negative control. The 133-bp promoter sequence was amplified with the following primer pairs: Forward, 5'-TGCCTGTTGGTTGAAGATG-3'; Reverse, 5'-CCAAAGATTCATCCAAGTTG-3'.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed using standard procedures. The following primary antibodies were used in the experiments: anti-FOXM1 antibody (Santa Cruz), anti-pAKT antibody (Peprotech, USA), anti-AKT antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA), anti-pGSK3β antibody (Proteintech) at 1:1000, anti-Snai1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pIGF1R antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-IGF1R antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-E-cadherin antibody (BD Biosciences, USA), anti-Vimentin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-N-cadherin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-pERK1/2 antibody (Abcam), anti-ERK1/2 antibody (Abcam), anti-HIF1α antibody (Novus Biologicals, USA), anti-ETS1 antibody (Abcam) and anti-β-actin antibody (Sigma, St. Louis, MO,USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PD-L1 and FOXM1 Protein Expression in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (#30525–89–4; FUJIFILM Wako Chemical, Wako, Japan) for 15 min and blocked with 1% bovine serum albumin in PBS‐00.1% Tween‐20 (PBS‐T) to reduce non‐specific antibody binding. The cells were then incubated overnight with anti‐PD‐L1 antibody (#14598382; eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) diluted 1:200, and anti‐FOXM1 antibody (#sc‐271746; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1:50 at 4 °C, followed by incubation for 1 h with Alexa Fluor 488‐labeled secondary antibody (#A11029; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342. After incubation, the cells were washed with PBS and mounted on glass slides using Prolong Glass Antifade mounting medium (#P36982; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Confocal microscopy was performed using a Zeiss 730 Meta microscope (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and analyzed using Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After washing with phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) twice, cultured cells were harvested and kept at −80°C until use. For western blot analysis, total proteins were extracted from cells using the IP lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) supplemented with the protease inhibitor cocktail III (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Then, the proteins were separated by electrophoresis using 4–20% SDS‐PAGE gel (Bio‐Rad) and transferred onto PVDF membranes. After blocking with skim milk (EMD Millipore) overnight, the membranes were incubated with the first antibody, respectively: anti‐TOPK antibody (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), anti‐FOXM1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti‐phospho‐FOXM1 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). We generated a mouse anti‐MELK (maternal embryonic leucine‐zipper kinase) monoclonal antibody using partial recombinant MELK protein of 264–601 amino acids.7 An anti‐β‐actin antibody (Sigma‐Aldrich) was used as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Signaling Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with IP lysis buffer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) containing protease inhibitor cocktail III (EMD Millipore, Billerica MA). The proteins were separated by electrophoresis using 4–20% SDS-PAGE gel (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated with the first antibody, respectively: anti-TOPK antibody (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ), anti-FOXM1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti-pan-Akt (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA), anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich), or anti-GAPDH antibody (Sigma-Aldrich). A mouse anti-MELK monoclonal antibody against partial MELK protein (264–601 amino acids) was used to detect MELK protein, as described previously [9 (link)]. β-actin or GAPDH was used as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!