The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

54 protocols using phenom xl

1

Particle Morphology Imaging via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The imaging of particle morphology was conducted with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using Phenom XL (Phenom-World BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). To guarantee sample grounding and to minimise charging effects, samples were fixed onto carbon stickers and gold-sputtered with BAL-Tec SCP 050 Sputter Coater (Leica Instruments, Wetzlar, Germany). All images were taken at 1000× or 2500× magnitude with an acceleration voltage of 10 kV and with the use of a backscatter detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation and Imaging of Insect Labia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The material was dissected to separate the labia from the head and cleaned in detergent using an ultrasonic cleaner. Then, the standard procedure was applied [54 (link)]: dehydration with a series of baths in 80%, 90%, and 96% ethanol solutions, for 20 min each, and two baths of 99.8% ethanol solution for 30 min each. The labia were glued with carbon adhesive discs on the aluminium pin stubs, which then were coated with a film of gold (30 nm) using the Q150T ES sputter coater with the rotary planetary stage (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Laughton, UK). SEM micrographs (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure 4) were obtained using a Phenom XL field emission scanning electron microscope (Phenom-World B.V., Eindhoven, The Netherlands) at 15 kV accelerating voltage and with a BackScatter Detector (BSD) and Secondary Electron Detector (SED) and Hitachi UHR FE-SEM SU8010 (High Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) with a secondary-electron detector (ESD) at 5, 7, and 10 kV accelerating voltage. To obtain high-quality figures, fragments of labia were imaged at high magnifications and combined using the Image Composite Editor (panoramic image stitcher) and the graphic editor Adobe Photoshop CS6. In a few cases, a series of images at different focal distances were taken and combined using the software mentioned above to attain the appropriate depth of field.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterizing Peptide-Iron Chelation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The occurrence of chelation reactions often alters the apparent structure of the peptide. Hence, the scanning electron microscopy (Phenom XL, Phenom-World BV, Eindhoven, Holland) was used to distinguish PSCP-Fe and PSCP by applying 10 mA current and 5 kV voltage. The chelating ability of peptides and Fe2+ is closely associated with the types of amino acid residues present. The amino acid composition of PSCP-Fe was characterized by a known method (16 (link)) with minor modifications. 100 mg of PSCP-Fe was hydrolyzed with 6 M HCl at 110°C for 24 h. The mixture was then analyzed using a Sykam amino acid analyzer (S-433D, Sykam Corporation, Munich, Germany). The chelation sites on PSCP and ferrous could be more easily diagnosed using a Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), whose experimental design was as follows: 5.0 mg each of PSCP and PSCP-Fe mixed with potassium bromide were flaked and then analyzed using an FTIR spectrometer (Shimadzu IRTracer-100, JPN) in the wavelength range of 4,000–400 cm–1 at 30°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microparticle Size and Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Size and morphology of microparticles were investigated using optical microscopy (Stereomicroscope Leica-S9i). In particular, each formulation was photographed immediately after the preparation (in the swollen state) and after the drying process. The average diameter and shape factor of at least 50 units for each batch were determined using the image analysis software Image J (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA) [26 (link)]. The shape factor is a value that provides information about the roundness of particles, the closer it is to 1, the more regular the particle is (the shape factor of a sphere is 1) [27 (link)].
Particle size distribution was defined by the sieve method: about 80 g of microparticles were put to the top of a series of sieves (1 mm, 710 and 500 µm) arranged in decreasing size apertures from top to bottom. The stack of sieves was vibrated, the amount of sample retained on each sieve was weighed and the particle size distribution curve was constructed.
Moreover, morphological evaluation of the sample surface and of the internal cross-section was carried out by scanning electron microscopy (Phenom XL, Thermo-Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Before analysis, which was carried out at 15 kV voltage, samples were sputter-coated with gold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microstructure and Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure and the chemical composition of the prepared materials were determined using Phenom XL (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with the Electron Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) system. Before the examination, all samples were sputter coated with a thin gold layer (3 nm) using EM ACE200 vacuum coater (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Back-scattered Electrons Detector and the acceleration voltage of 10 kV (for SEM images) or 15 kV (for EDS analysis) were applied. The results of the EDS analysis were given as the average from four spots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Microstructure and Composition Analysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure and chemical composition of the samples were investigated using Phenom XL (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with electron dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) system. The examination included the surfaces and the cross sections. Back-scattered electrons detector and the acceleration voltage of 10 kV (for SEM images) or 15 kV (for EDS analysis) were applied. The characterization of the cross sections required their appropriate preparation. The applied procedure included the following steps: the deposition of a thin gold coating (about 20 nm) to improve the adhesion of an additional nickel layer to the investigated material using EM ACE200 (Leica, Japan) vacuum coater, the application of a protective nickel coating (with the thickness of about 2–3 μm) by electroplating technique, the immersion of the samples in a temperature resistant resin (Struers, Denmark) and finally their polishing according to the standard Struers procedure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Membrane Surface Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrophilicity of the membranes was analyzed by a contact angle meter (SDC-100s, SDC Technologies, Shanghai, China) and an atomic force microscope (AFM, Multimode Nanoscope-V, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). An XPS analysis (Escalab 250Xi) of the membrane surface was performed to analyze the surface roughness and elements of the membranes. The cross-section morphology of the membranes was evaluated by a field-emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, Phenom XL, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The membrane samples were ruptured in liquid nitrogen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Chitosan-based Sponge Microstructure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM images of the chitosan-based sponge were obtained using a scanning electron microscope Thermo Scientific Phenom XL with a backscattered electron detector at an accelerating voltage of 5 kV and a pressure of 60 Pa without a conductive coating.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterizing Cell Morphology via SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning electron microscope “Phenom XL” (ThermoFisher Scientific, Schiphol, The Netherlands) was used. The source of electrons was CeB6, a SEC sputter pioneer was used, model: MCM-100P Ion Sputter Coater, MSA system software. The samples were dusted with a gold layer (sputtering time 40 s). The studies were performed at 200x magnification. SEM allowed for the cell height (H) and width (W) to be measured. The cell width and height results were used to calculate the anisotropy coefficient (AC) (Equation (8)): AC=HW
The base H and W values were used to calculate the cel/whole surface area (SA)—Equation (9).
SA=H×W(mm2)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrospun PLA Filter Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The study of the morphology of the electrospun filters was provided through a scanning electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phenom XL, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDAX) probe to classify the elemental composition of the PLA fiber and the particulate retained. The image analysis was provided using discretization of at least three images per sample and the fiber diameters of the different filters were evaluated. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images analysis was also provided to support the filtration tests.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!