The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Whatman filter papers no 1

Manufactured by Cytiva

Whatman filter papers No. 1 are general-purpose filter papers designed for a variety of laboratory filtration applications. They are made from high-quality cellulose fibers and are available in a range of sizes and quantities to meet the needs of different laboratory settings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using whatman filter papers no 1

1

Biosynthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaves of Phoenix dactylifera were collected from botanic garden, Dept. of Botany and Microbiology, King Saud University, with full permission has obtained from institute. The extract was prepared by drying leaves at room temperature and washed in distilled water, 5 g of this powder was homogenized completely in 100 ml Milli-Q water and extracted at ≤ 80 °C for 20 min. The resultant was filtered using Whatman filter papers No. 1. Then, extract was stored at 4 °C and used for generating biosynthesized zinc oxide nanoparticles. Zinc nitrate (99.999%) was purchased from Sigma. The synthesis of ZnO NPs was carried out by taking a 0.05 M of Zinc nitrate in 100 ml Milli-Q water. Then, 2:2 (v/v) of leaf extract and Zinc nitrate to obtain a mixture solution in a round-bottom flask, and incubated with constant stirring (100 rpm) at 40 °C for 24 h. The solution was cooled to room temperature and filtered using Whatman filter papers No. 1. The precipitate was washed with deionized water and absolute ethanol for several times using centrifugation (5000 rpm for 5 min), and dried in an oven at 60 °C for 24 h. Finally, the product was calcined at 600 °C for 3 h28 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction of Bark Powder Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction was performed according to the method described by Harborne [26 ]. Briefly, the methanolic extract was obtained by cold maceration of 200 g of L. eriocalyx bark powder in 750 ml of methanol (AR grade) in a 1 liter conical flask and regularly agitated for 48 hours. The mixture was carefully decanted and filtered using Whatman filter papers(No. 1) and concentrated in vacuo with a rotary evaporator at 50°C. The extract was transferred into a clean, dry, labelled, preweighed universal glass bottle and kept in a hot-air oven set at 35°C for five days to allow for complete drying.
On the other hand, the aqueous extract was obtained by warming 50 g of the powdered L. eriocalyx bark powder at 58°C in distilled water on a water bath for two hours. The resulting mixture was cooled to room temperature, filtered through a Whatman filter paper (No. 1), and transferred into clean freeze-drying flasks. The flasks were covered with solid CO2-acetone mixture and then fitted into a freeze dryer for lyophilization for 48 hours. The dry and lyophilized extracts were transferred into clean, dry, preweighed, and labeled universal glass bottles. The percentage yields of the individual extracts were determined using the formula described by Harborne [26 ] and modified by Truong et al. [27 (link)]: % yield=weight of extractweight of macerated powder×100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Green Zinc Nanoparticle Synthesis from Nigella sativa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nigella sativa seed extract was prepared by crushing seed in a grinder. Resultant seed powder was thoroughly washed in distilled water and 10 g of this powder was homogenized completely in 50 ml double distilled water and incubated with constant stirring (100 rpm) at 80 °C for 20 min. The resultant mixture then filtered using Whatman filter papers No. 1 to remove debris. This extract was used for generating green zinc nanoparticles. The extract was stored at 4 °C for future uses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Artemisia Leaf Extraction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The leaves of Artemisia species (A. monosperma, Judaica, and A. sieberi) were air-dried and grounded using an electronic blender. Then, 5 g of powdered leaves were extracted in 200 mL of methanol (25 mg/mL) and placed in a shaker at room temperature for 48 h. The leaf extract was filtered using Whatman filter papers No. 1. Next, the extract was allowed to dry naturally at room temperature and stored at 4 °C for further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Solvent Extraction of Gall Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Acetone, methanol, ethanol and aqueous extractions were performed using a modified method by Baharuddin et al. (7 (link)). The galls were washed, dried and pulverised before dissolved, and macerated in respective solvents at a ratio of 100 g of dried crude powder per 500 mL of absolute solvent for 72 h in a water bath at 50 °C. The extracts were filtered using Whatman filter papers (No. 1). The acetone, methanol and ethanol filtrates were concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 55 °C. The resulting pellets were pounded to dryness at 50 °C for two days to produce powdery and brown crude extracts. The aqueous filtrate was concentrated using a rotary evaporator at 80 °C and the resulting pellet was freeze-dried at −50 °C under vacuum to produce a fine crystal-like crude aqueous extract. The crude extracts were weighed and stored in sealed vials at 4 °C for further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction of Bioactive Compounds from T. polium

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aerial parts and root of T. polium L. were collected at different phenological stages from the Saravan rangelands, Sistan, and Baluchestan, Iran (27°17′30″ N, 62°17′11″ E). The species was identified at the Department of Range and Watershed Management, University of Zabol, Iran, and a voucher specimen of the plant (No. 1154) was deposited for future reference. The plant samples were dried at 40 °C using an oven for 72 h and finally ground by using an electric grinder (Pars Khazar, Tehran, Iran) to obtain a fine powder. The extraction was performed magnetically stirring 5 g of the powder with 50 mL of methanol for approximately 10 h at room temperature (25 ± 1 °C). The higher extraction capacity of methanol can produce a large number of active compounds responsible for the biological activity of the prepared extracts [83 ,84 (link)]. The extracts were filtered using Whatman filter papers No. 1. The resulted extracts were evaporated under vacuum conditions to dryness and stored for the next experiments at 4 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Aqueous Extraction of C. dipsaceus Leaves and Fruits

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hot maceration method was used for aqueous extraction. Briefly, 400 grams of the respective dried leaf and fruit powders of C. dipsaceus were soaked in 2.75 L of distilled water and heated in a water bath at 60 o C for two hours. The mixtures were individually filtered through rolls of cotton gauze and then through Whatman filter papers (No. 1) into separate flasks. The respective filtrates were subdivided into 200 mL portions and transferred into freeze-drying flasks, which were covered with carbon ice and acetone. The respective flasks, which were labelled appropriately, were then fitted into a freeze dryer and lyophilised for 48 hours. The obtained extracts of the respective plant parts were transferred into clean labelled and pre-weighed sample bottles, weighed and the respective percentage yields determined using the formula in section 2.2.1 (Eq. 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cold Maceration Extraction of Cussonia dipsaceus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cold maceration procedure was followed. Briefly, 400 g of the dry leaf and fruit powders of C. dipsaceus were separately soaked in 1 litre of HPLC-grade methanol in 1.5-L conical flasks, shaken, and covered with an aluminium foil in separate setups. The respective mixtures were allowed to extract for 48 hours with regular shaking, after which they were individually filtered through cotton wool rolls into separate clean conical flasks. The resultant filtrates were filtered again through Whatman filter papers (No. 1) into separate round-bottomed flasks and concentrated in vacuo using a rotary evaporator at 50 o C. The resultant extracts were transferred into well labelled pre-weighed sample bottles and completely dried in a hot air oven set at 35°C. Then, the percentage yields of the respective methanolic leaf and fruit extracts of C. dipsaceus were calculated according to the equation (Eq. 1) described by Truong et al (22) (link). Eq. ( 1)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antimicrobial Potential of Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Circular disks measuring 6 mm in diameter were prepared by poking Whatman filter papers (No. 1) and sterilizing in an autoclave at 121 o C, for 15 minutes. The discs were then arranged appropriately on the solidified media in Petri dishes (5 per plate). Markings were made at the bottom of each plate to identify the respective discs, type of treatment applied, and the microbe strain under study. Then, using a sterile micropipette, 20 µL of each studied plant extract, at respective concentrations, were aspirated and dispensed carefully onto respective discs. The discs were then gently but firmly pressed onto the media inoculated with 1 mL of the respective microbial strains used in this study to ensure proper contact. The experiments were set up in triplicate, with DMSO as the negative control and ciprofloxacin (for bacterial strains) and nystatin (for the fungal strain) as positive controls. The plates were incubated at 37 o C for 24 hours in an incubator, and the inhibition zones of microbial growth were measured using a digital zone reader in millimeters (mm) (28) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Whatman filter papers no 1 »