The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using sephadex g 200

1

Cellular Uptake Profiling of Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to evaluate the profile of the cellular uptake, NP were labelled with the Oregon Green® 488 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) probe by following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the NP solution was incubated with Oregon Green® 488 for 1 h, at 37 °C, in the dark with gently stirring. Excess Oregon green was further removed by SEC using a Sephadex G-200 (GE-Healthcare Life Sciences) equilibrated with 20 mM Hepes buffer at pH 7.4. The labelled NP were eluted in SEC buffer and further used.
HepG2 cells were grown as described above for the in vitro cell viability assays. The culture medium was replaced by 100 µL of medium containing 20 µL of Oregon Green labelled NP and cells were further incubated for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in humidified atmosphere. After the 24 h incubation period, cells were washed three times with 250 µL of pre-warmed (37 °C) PBS buffer containing 20 mM glycine at pH 7.4. The washing solution was removed and cells were disrupted with 100 µL 1% Triton ×100 solution. Fluorescence was measured at λexc485 nm and λem520 nm on a Microplate Reader FLUOstar Omega. Internalization was calculated as a percentage considering the fluorescence obtained immediately after the labelled NP addition as 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protein Oligomeric State Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the oligomeric state of the native protein, the sample was applied to a gel filtration column (Sephadex G-200, GE Healthcare) as described [34 (link)]. For molecular weight determination, molecular weight standards (GE Healthcare) were separated under identical conditions. Chemical cross-linking of Nesprin-2-SMC (1 mg/ml) was performed with the zero-length cross-linking reagent EDC (1-ethyl-3-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]carbodiimide hydrochloride) (Thermo Fisher) together with sNHS (Sulfo-N-hydroxysuccinimide) in 0.1 M MES buffer (pH 6.5) [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification of Acinetobacter baumannii Glycoprotein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Acinetobacter baumannii cells were harvested via centrifugation at 8000 g for 10 min at 4°C and then dissolved in buffer A1 (20 mM Tris‐HCl [pH 7.5], 10 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl). Cells were broken by homogenizer and centrifuged at 10 000 g at 4°C for 30 min to remove insoluble material. The glycosylated protein was purified using a chelating column (1.6 × 15 cm2, GE Healthcare), that was pre‐equilibrated with buffer A1. Bound protein was eluted with 100% buffer A2 (20 mM Tris‐HCl [pH 7.5], 500 mM imidazole, 500 mM NaCl). The fraction containing glycoprotein was further purified using a Sephadex G‐200 (1.6 × 90 cm2, GE Healthcare) column, exchanging the buffer to PBS buffer. Fractions containing glycoprotein were collected and analysed via SDS‐PAGE. The protein level of C‐CPS was measured using the micro‐bicinchoninic acid method (MicroBCA protein assay kit; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The carbohydrate level of C‐CPS was measured using the phenol–sulfate method (Dubois, 1956 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification of Recombinant Enzyme Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were harvested using centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 20 min at 4°C. The pellets were stored at -80°C before purification. Cell pellets from 1L LB culture were thawed and resuspended in 10 mL extraction buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, and 2 mM β-mercaptoethanol, at pH 8.0) and DNase I (50 units). The cell pellet was disrupted with a cell disrupter (Constant System Ltd, USA). Two cycles of pressure (30 GPa) were applied to destroy the cells. Following removal of the insoluble portion of the crude cell lysate with an ultra-centrifuge (20 min, 75,000 x g, 4°C), the supernatant was passed through a membrane (0.45 μm) and loaded onto an anion- exchange column (Q-column) (GE Healthcare Life Science, USA). The column was washed with 100 mL buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, at pH 7.0), and eluted with the elution buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, at pH 7.0). The active fractions were collected and concentrated with an ultracentrifuge, and further purified with a size-exclusion column (Sephadex G-200, GE Healthcare Life Science, USA). The protein concentration was determined with the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., USA). The aliquot protein was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

CAT-VEGF Conjugate Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CAT–VEGF conjugate was separated using Sephadex G-200 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala) gel filtration column equilibrated with 100 mM PB (pH 7.0) at a flow rate of 0.6 mL min−1 under the monitoring of A280 via an ultraviolet spectrometer. Aliquots of 300 µL of each fraction were collected, and the CAT activity was examined via CL-based CAT assay using H2O2-sensitive TGA-CdTe quantum dots assay [56 ]. The protein components of effective fractions were analyzed by 8% native-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification and Characterization of LSEP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LSEP was extracted using the method mentioned in a previous study [34 (link)]. After fermentation for 144 h, the culture broth was centrifuged at 12,000× g for 10 min to obtain a cell-free supernatant. Subsequently, trichloroacetic acid (4%, w/v) was added to the supernatant and incubated at 4 °C for 6 h to remove the protein. To precipitate the LSEP, pre-cooled 98% ethanol (1:3 volumetric ratio) was mixed and kept at 4 °C for 12–14 h. Furthermore, the LSEP obtained by alcohol precipitation was dialyzed in deionized water using a dialysis bag (Mw cutoff 20,000 Da). After dialysis, the retentate was freeze-dried to obtain LSEP.
The LSEP solution (100 mg/mL) was subjected to a DEAE-Sepharose Fast Flow column (2.6 × 20 cm, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and eluted with step gradient of sodium chloride (0–0.5 M) at the flow rate of 1 mL/min. The total sugar contents of the collected fractions were measured by the phenol-sulfuric acid method [64 (link)]. The selected fractions were pooled, desalted, and further purified using gel-filtration chromatography with a Sephadex-G 200 (1.6 × 50 cm, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). The collection of fractions was carried out at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min using deionized water and the total sugar content in the eluate fractions was tested using the phenol-sulfuric acid method. The purified LSEP was dried and stored for further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Oat Bran Hydrolysis and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Oat bran was purchased from Tong Yuan Gong He Co., Ltd. (Yantai, China). TermamylSC and amyloglucosidase were obtained from Novozymes Co., Ltd. (Bagsvaerd, Denmark). Pepsin and trypsin were obtained from Amresco Co., Ltd. (Solon, OH, USA). Lichenase was purchased from Megazyme (Wicklow, Ireland). Mannose, glucose, galactose, xylose, arabinose, and fucose standard were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). DEAE52 and SephadexG200 were purchased from GE Healthcare. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purification and Characterization of CAT-VEGF Conjugate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CAT-VEGF conjugate was separated using Sephadex G-200 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala) gel ltration column equilibrated with 100 mM PB (pH 7.0) at a ow rate of 0.6 mL min -1 under the monitoring of A 280 via an ultraviolet spectrometer. Aliquots of 300 µl of each fraction were collected, and the CAT activity was examined via CL-based CAT assay using H 2 O 2 -sensitive TGA-CdTe quantum dots assay (56). The protein components of effective fractions were analyzed by 8% native-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purification and Analysis of CAT-VEGF Conjugate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CAT-VEGF conjugate was separated using Sephadex G-200 (GE Healthcare, Uppsala) gel ltration column equilibrated with 100 mM PB (pH 7.0) at a ow rate of 0.6 mL min - 1 under the monitoring of A 280 via an ultraviolet spectrometer. Aliquots of 300 µl of each fraction were collected and the CAT activity was examined via CL-based CAT assay using H 2 O 2 -sensitive TGA-CdTe quantum dots assay (44) . The protein components of effective fractions were analyzed by 8% native-PAGE and stained by Coomassie Brilliant Blue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cytotoxic Effects of Pleurotus ostreatus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Materials and reagents. Pleurotus ostreatus (strain, beiping 11) was maintained at the School of Life Science, Liaoning University (Shenyang, China). MTT, penicillin, streptomycin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-52 and Sephadex G-200 were purchased from GE Healthcare (Uppsala, Sweden). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) and RPMI-1640 media were purchased from Gibco Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA). All other chemical reagents were analytical reagent grade, and were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise specified.
The BGC-823 human gastric cancer cells were obtained from China Medical University (Shenyang, China). The cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) at 37˚C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO 2 . The cells were harvested once they had reached the exponential growth phase. All procedures involving animals and their care were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines for the Laboratory Animal Care of Experimental Animal Center, China Medical University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!