Example 12
Fusion Abs of the disclosure were tested in several cell lines to compare the effectiveness of targeted fusion Abs versus non-targeted fusion Abs. Briefly, 1×10e4 cells/well (50 uL/well) of each cell line were seeded into 96-well tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson). The next day cells were treated with 50 uL/well of each indicated Ab at the indicated concentrations. Six (6) days later, 20 uL/well MTS reagent (Promega) was added to the plates. Absorbance changes are read at 490 nm with a Biotek EPOCH reader. The results show that the Targeted Fusion Abs are more effective than the Non-Targeted Fusion Abs. (See,
In another experiment, 1.5×10e4 U266 cells/well (50 uL/well) or 1×10e4 CAPAN-2 cells/well (50 uL/well) were seeded into 96-well tissue culture plates (Becton Dickinson). U266 cells were treated the same day, while CAPAN-2 cells were treated the next day with 50 uL/well of each indicated Ab at the indicated concentrations. Six (6) days after treatment, 20 uL/well MTS reagent (Promega) was added to the plates. Absorbance changes are read at 490 nm with a Biotek EPOCH reader. The results show that the Targeted Fusion Abs are more effective than the Non-Targeted Fusion Abs. In addition, the masked Fusion Ab is less effective than the cleaved version. (See,