The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Su8020

Manufactured by Hitachi
Sourced in Japan, United States, Germany

The SU8020 is a high-resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM) developed by Hitachi. It is designed to provide high-quality images and data for a wide range of applications, including materials science, nanotechnology, and life sciences research. The SU8020 features a stable electron optical system, advanced imaging capabilities, and user-friendly software, making it a reliable and versatile tool for advanced microscopy analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

379 protocols using su8020

1

Morphological Characterization of Fibers and Papers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of the fibers was characterized with 5 kV using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Hitachi SU8020, Tokyo, Japan) at 400× magnification. Fibers were mounted onto a bronze stab with carbon double-sided tape and coated with gold in a sputter coater (E1030 Ion Sputter, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The RSP samples were immersed in liquid nitrogen and subsequently cut down by a sharp blade. The surface area and cross section structures of the papers were observed with 5 kV by using SEM (Hitachi SU8020, Tokyo, Japan) at 200× and 100× magnification, respectively. The paper samples were cut (1 × 1 cm) and mounted onto a bronze stub with carbon double-sided tape. Prior to visualization, the papers were spluttered with gold using a sputter coater (E1030 Ion Sputter, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hair Surface Morphology by SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SEM is an intuitive method to observe the hair surface morphology, which has been widely used over many years for claim substantiation of various toiletry treatments on the architecture of the hair’s surface34 (link)35 36 (link). The extent of photodamage of hair surface would be straightforward enough to observe by SEM image. The photodamage of hair surface generally appears as bumps on hair fiber surface, where the cuticles lift, crack and even come off25 . Scanning electron images of the surface of hair samples were obtained using a high resolution environmental SEM (Hitachi SU8020, SU8020 with excellent low accelerating voltage imaging capability, and directly applicable for nonconductive samples). Every hair strands (3 strands from near scalp, middle, and near tip respectively) with an identical length of 1 cm before and after UV irradiation were fixed on the sample holder stub using a copper adhesive ribbon. Images were obtained under vacuum, using a 1 kV accelerating voltage and 800× magnification. For each sample, at least 10 images were obtained on different areas to ensure the reproducibility of the results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Mycelial Growth and Spore Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The growth and development of the mycelium and spore morphology were observed by using a light microscope (CX43, Olympus, Japan) and scanning electron microscope (SEM; Su8020, Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). To observe the effect of γ-heptalactone on mycelial growth, 10 μL spore suspension was inoculated on PDA and was cultured at 30 °C, and the morphology was observed with a microscope. For the SEM analysis, the mycelium was fixed in a 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution for 12 h and washed twice with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). Then, the mycelium was dehydrated with different concentrations of ethanol solution (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, and 100%) and each was repeated twice. The mycelium was collected after centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 5 min and the supernatant was discarded. Then, the solvent hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) was added and the sample was dried in the oven at 60 °C until it became powder [55 (link)]. The mycelial sample was observed using a Su8020 SEM (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Microscopic Visualization of Cucumber Epidermis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After cucumber fruit skin was air-dried, the epidermis cells were visualized under a HITACHI SU8020 variable pressure SEM (Hitachi, Japan). For TEM assay, fruit skin were cut into small pieces, and were collected for fixation, and the process was performed as according to Wang et al. (2019) [54 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Structural Characterization of Porous Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porous structures of the materials under investigation were characterized by using nitrogen (N2) adsorption/desorption analysis at −196 °C on Micromeritics Tristar II 3020, and the specific surface area (SBET) was calculated using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. Prior N2 sorption analysis, the sample was degassed at 100 °C under vacuum for at least 24 h. The total pore volume (Vtotal) was measured from the adsorption amounts of N2 gas at p/p0 = 0.99 and the micropore volume (Vmicro) was determined by density functional theory (DFT). The mesopore volumes (Vmeso) were calculated by subtracting the Vmicro from Vtotal. The structural transformation and degree of graphitization of the materials were analyzed using Raman spectroscopy (on Raman Xplora Plus spectrometer). To study the phase structure and crystallinity of the materials, an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Rigaku SmartLab; Rigaku Corporation, The Woodlands, TX, United States) was used. Surface morphology and diameter, as well as the elemental composition of the materials, were analyzed using field electron scanning emission microscope coupled with elemental dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FE-SEM-EDX, Hitachi SU8020; Hitachi High-Technologies Corporaation, Tokyo, Japan). Prior to FE-SEM analysis, all samples were dried at 100 °C and stored in a desiccator overnight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial Surface Morphology Changes After D-AP19

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphologic changes of bacterial cell surfaces after D-AP19 treatment were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) as previously described26 ,27 . Bacterial cells in mid-log phase were diluted with PBS to obtain an OD620 of 0.05 and incubated at 37 °C for 0.25 h with peptide at a concentration of 0.5 × MIC. After incubation, the treated bacterial cells were centrifuged at 10,000 g for 10 min and washed 3 times with PBS, pH 7.2. Then, they were filtered through 0.22 µM mixed cellulose ester (MCE) membrane filters to retain the treated bacterial cells. Samples were pre-fixed by immersion into 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde–PBS, then post-fixed with 1% OsO4 in DW. After washing 3 times, they were dehydrated using a graded ethanol series of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80% and 100%, 15 min in each dilution. After that, the samples were transferred into absolute ethanol 2 times, 15 min each time. Specimens were then dried and coated by platinum particle using Sputter Coater (Quorum Q150R ES; Quorum). Processed bacterial cells were observed using a scanning electron microscope (Hitachi SU8020; Hitachi, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Surface Properties

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface roughness has been measured with an optic 3D measuring instrument InfiniteFocusSL Alicona. Microhardness measurements were performed on a Vickers tester UHL VMHT AUTO using a load of different values within the compound zone and diffusion layer. Chemical composition was examined with the microanalysis X-ray method on an EDS detector (EDS NSS 312, ThermoScientific, Waltham, MA, USA), which was connected to a scanning electron microscope HitachiSu8020. Microstructure analyses were conducted on scanning electron microscopes—JEOL-6400 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and HitachiSu8020 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted using an Empyrean (PANalytical, Malvern, UK) diffractometer with a monochromator and PIXcel3D detector. A Cu anode was used to obtain Cu Kα (Kα1 = 0.154056 nm). The measurements were conducted in 2θ ranges of 20–80°. The PDF-4+ 2020 International Centre for Diffraction Data database and High Score Plus software were used for phase analysis.
Chemical composition was determined with X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy in a commercial UHV surface analysis system (PREVAC, Rogow, Poland). The analysis chamber was equipped with nonmonochromatic X-ray photoelectron spectroscope and a kinetic electron energy analyzer (SES 2002; Scienta, Uppsala, Sweden). The XPS analysis was performed using Al Kα (h = 1489.6 eV) radiation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrochemical Characterization of AuNPs/CS/MXene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The conventional three-electrode system was used for the electrochemical experiments. The modified glass carbon electrode (3 mm) was used as a working electrode, a saturated Ag/AgCl was used as a reference electrode, and a platinum wire (1 mm) was used as the auxiliary electrode. All electrodes were obtained from Aida Heng-sheng Technology Development Co., Ltd. (Aida, Tianjin, China). Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) (Gamry 600+, Warminster, PA, USA) and amperometric (i-t) (Gamry 600+, Warminster, PA, USA) measurements were performed by the Gamry 600+ (Warminster, PA, USA) electrochemical workstation.
For AuNPs/CS/MXene characterization, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry (EDS) were recorded by Hitachi SU8020 (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were obtained by Tecnai G2 F30 (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and Bruker D8-Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of CuNW Transparent Electrodes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The morphology of CuNW transparent electrode was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi SU8020, Hitachi High Technologies America, Inc.). The composition of the surface coatings was also investigated by X-ray diffractometry (XRD, Rigaku Smart Lab, Rigaku Americas Holding Company Inc.). The transmittance of CuNW transparent electrodes was measured using a UV-visible-near infrared spectrophotometer (V670, JASCO Corp.) at 550 nm. The sheet resistance was examined by the four-probe method with a surface resistivity meter (LorestaGPT610, Mitsubishi Chemical Analytech Co. Ltd). The bending test was examined using a machine which could bend the sample from 0° to 180° on rods with various diameters. The resistance was recorded in time using a resistance meter (RM 3544-01, Hioki E.E. Corporation). The thermal property of the PET films was tested by simultaneous thermogravimetry-differential scanning calorimetry, (STA/TG-DSC, STA449 F3, NETZCH) with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in nitrogen atmosphere.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Electrochemical Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All electrochemical measurements, including chronoamperometry, cyclic voltammetry (CV), and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were performed on an AUTOLAB PGSTAT302 N electrochemical workstation (METROHM AUTOLAB B·V., The Netherlands). A conventional three-electrode system which was consisted of a platinum wire as the auxiliary electrode, Ag/AgCl (saturated KCl) as the reference electrode, and a 3-mm diameter GCE as the working electrode was used in this work. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images and energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS) images were obtained using Hitachi SU8020 (Hitachi Limited Japan). UV–Vis absorbance measurements were carried out by a UV-1750 UV–Vis spectrophotometer (SHIMADZU Co., Ltd., Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!