The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Transcriptome analysis console tac

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) is a software application designed for the analysis of gene expression data from high-throughput sequencing experiments. It provides a comprehensive suite of tools for the processing, normalization, and statistical analysis of transcriptome data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

20 protocols using transcriptome analysis console tac

1

Transcriptomic Analysis of Host Immune Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AffymetrixClariom™ S Arrays (mouse) interrogate more than 22,100 genes in around 800,000 probes. The generated data (expression values of genes) were analyzed using the Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) version 4.0.2.15 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with the SST-RMA normalization algorithm (robust multi-array average, improved by “signal space transformation”). Technical replicate groups were summarized using LIMMA (linear models for microarray data) statistics. Differentially expressed genes (DEG) were identified using filter parameters, fold change >2 or ≤2, old-change > 2 or ≤ 2, LIMMA p value < 0.05, and FDR q value < 0.05. For the comparative analysis, we always compared groups of infected (M, F, or MF) mice to the group of uninfected mice (naive). Multivariate analysis was carried out by principal component analysis (PCA), also using Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) version 4.0.2.15 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Differential gene expression levels were visualized using TAC version 4.0.2.15 to prepare volcano plots. ShinyGO (version 0.61; Ge et al., 2020 (link)) was used to classify genes according to Gene Ontology (GO) categories and analyze them for enrichment. Further, expression levels of chosen genes linked to the host’s immune response were grouped according to their function and visualized using Origin (version 2021; OriginLab) to create a heat map.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Skeletal Muscle Biopsy and Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Skeletal muscle biopsies were obtained from the lateral part of vastus lateralis muscle using a Bergström needle as previously described (10 (link)). Biopsies were taken 8 days before (baseline) and 5 days after the intervention in a resting state 60 minutes after the end of an OGTT. Gene expression was performed as previously described (10 (link)). In brief, total RNA was isolated from vastus lateralis biopsies using a miRNeasy Kit (Qiagen). Gene expression levels were determined using the Human Clariom S array (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC; version 4.0.0.25; Thermo Fisher) was used for quality control and to obtain annotated normalized SST-RMA (signal space transformation-robust multichip analysis) gene-level data. Data are available from the GEO database at NCBI with the accession numbers GSE161749 (10 (link)) and GSE161750 (10 (link)). As outlined in the study design, 25 samples from 7 individuals (50, 58, 61, 62, 66, 67, and 72) were not included in this analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Lung mononuclear cells miRNA analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
miRNA analysis was carried out as described previously (Alharris et al., 2018 (link); Neamah et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, total RNA, including miRNA, was isolated from lung mononuclear cells using the miRNeasy kit from QIAGEN and following the protocol of the company. Microarray was performed using Affymetrix miRNA Array (version 4.1). Raw files generated from the miRNA microarray were uploaded to Gene Expression Omnibus (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo) and deposited under accession number GSE220159. By using Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC, ThermoFisher, United States), Log2 fold change of more than 3,000 miRNAs was detected from the raw array data, and only those miRNAs that were altered more than 2-fold were considered for further analysis. Filtered miRNAs were analyzed for their role in various biological pathways using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software http://www.ingenuity.com (Qiagen, Germany). Also, microRNA.org database was used to examine the sequence alignment regions between miR-100-5p and its targeted genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Transcriptomic Analysis of Liver Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Affymetrix gene expression data were pre-processed using Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) (v4.0, ThermoFisher Scientific). Custom mouse Brainarray chip definition (v22) was used to further annotate the DE files with Entrez and gene symbol IDs. For further analysis, just gene transcript with FDR (a = 0.05) correction and 1.5 > fold change was considerated. For pathway enrichment analysis, data obtained from untreated wild type or IRE1αcKO after poly I:C treatment liver mice tissues were used as reference for tunicamycin (Tm) and etoposide (Eto) treatment comparisons, to further input them in ClueGO (v2.3.2) software using Reactome pathway enrichment database (v09.11.2016). In addition, to visualize patterns in the gene expression and pathway enrichment scores for specific ontologies, heatmaps were generated using RStudio (v0.99.489, R 3.4.1) based on KEGG pathway database gene lists. Genes which show change of the ratios higher (or lower) than 1.5-fold in the arrays at any comparison have been considered as up or downregulated and subjected for functional enrichment analysis. The Bioconductor package ‘clusterProfiler’ was applied to perform functional enrichment analysis using the following repositories: GO (Gene Ontology), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes), and Reactome Pathways. GEO Dataset ID: GSE130952.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Analysis of Polycystic Kidneys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The original human microarray dataset was identified and downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) (ID: GSE7869) as raw CEL files. The array was performed using GPL570 (Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array). The kidney samples included 5 polycystic kidneys and 3 non-cancerous cortical tissue samples from kidneys removed for renal cell carcinoma as described by Song et al.46 (link). The 5 polycystic kidney samples were separated into minimally cystic tissue (MCT) (n = 5) and small (<1 ml, n = 5), medium (10–20 ml, n = 5) and large cysts (>50 ml, n = 3)46 (link). For cystic cell micro array expression analysis, a previous dataset was identified and downloaded from the ArrayExpress data base (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/) (ID: E-MTAB-4189). The cell culture micro arrays are derived from two non-cystic cell cultures and three cystic cell cultures as outlined by Streets et al.45 (link). Individual gene expression analysis was performed using Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC), Thermo Fisher Scientific. Where multiple probes targeted the same gene, the sum of probe intensities was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gene Expression Profiling of Macrodissected Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were provided by NI Biobank. In brief, total RNA was extracted from macrodissected tissue and amplified using the GeneChip WT Pico Reagent Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA). The biotinylated sense-stranded DNA was hybridized to the ClariomTM D Human array (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, NC, USA) and profiled. Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC; Thermo Fisher Scientific) software was used to conduct quality control (QC) assessments and data summarization prior to further analysis (see Supplementary Materials for details).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Transcriptome Analysis Console Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The raw array CEL data were processed and analyzed by Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC, version 4.0.0.25, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The signal space transformation-robust multi-chip analysis algorithm was used for quantifying the expression at both gene and exon levels. The threshold for positive versus negative area under the curve (AUC) was set at 0.6. Samples below or equal to this threshold were excluded from the downstream analyses. All other parameters were set as default.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptome Profiling of Cell Types

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quality and quantity of the 60 nucleic acid samples were established using the Agilent Bioanalyzer RNA Nano kit and the Nanodrop 1000, respectively. GeneChip 3′ IVT PLUS Reagent Kit (Thermo Scientific) provided sufficient amplified double-stranded cDNA for each holoclone, meroclone, or paraclone total RNA sample, letting to in vitro transcribe it to labeled cRNA, that could be fragmented and therefore hybridized onto single GeneChip™ Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array (ThermoScientific), following the manufacturer’s indications. To avoid batch effect among samples, i.e. no technical sources of variation added to the samples during handling, samples were randomized during RNA isolation, sample preparation, and hybridization/scanning working sessions. All samples were processed with the same reagents lot number, when available. Sample and hybridization quality controls were carried out with Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC, ThermoScientific) to verify complete and unbiased coverage of the transcriptome.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Identifying ZEB1-regulated Genes in Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, microarray data from Lehmann et al. were processed and analyzed for differential expression using the Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC) from ThermoFisher. The set of significantly downregulated genes (FDR < 0.05, log(Fold change) <−2) was obtained. Next, genes which were significantly (Spearman r >0.5) correlated with ZEB1 in the breast cancer TCGA dataset were identified and downloaded. The two gene sets were compared for intersection, with 186 genes contained in both sets. Finally, the BRCA-TCGA expression data for these genes in the breast cancer dataset was downloaded. The partial correlation for each gene with ZEB1 was computed, adjusting for the stromal cell content using the ppcor package. The overlap between ZEB1-regulated and -correlated genes was tested for significance using the hypergeometric test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptome analysis of NEN and domperidone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the transcriptome analysis, HCT116 cells were treated with vehicle control, 1.2 µM NEN, 30 µM domperidone, and NEN + domperidone. Cells were harvested after 16 h, before the occurrence of major cell death. Total RNA was isolated employing the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) including on‐column DNase digestion. The Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer was used to assess RNA quality, and only high‐quality RNA (RIN > 7) was used for microarray analysis. 3 out of 5 replicates were chosen for the microarray analysis. Total RNA (150 ng) was amplified using the WT PLUS Reagent Kit (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, US). Amplified cDNA was hybridized on Human Clariom S HT arrays (Affymetrix). Staining and scanning was done according to the Affymetrix expression protocol. Transcriptome Analysis Console (TAC; version 4.0.0.25; Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used for quality control. Array data have been submitted to the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) at NCBI (accession: GSE148682).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!