The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Kinetex evo c18 column

Manufactured by Phenomenex
Sourced in United States, Germany, Japan, United Kingdom, Spain, Italy

The Kinetex EVO C18 column is a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of analytes. It features a silica-based stationary phase with a C18 ligand, providing excellent retention and selectivity for both polar and non-polar compounds. The column is characterized by its reliable and robust performance, making it suitable for a variety of analytical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

71 protocols using kinetex evo c18 column

1

Characterizing PIC Nanoparticles by DLS, Zeta, and TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and ζ-potential measurements were carried out in a Zetasizer Nano ZS (Malvern Instruments Ltd.) stabilised at 37 °C. DLS was read at 173° (backscattering) for 60 s in triplicate and ζ-potentials were recorded 30 times at 140 V. TEM images of PIC nanoparticles were acquired on a JEM-1200EX (JEOL USA Inc.). PIC particle size was measured from TEM micrographs using ImageJ software (version 1.48v) and measuring each nanoparticle twice: both in their longest and shortest diameters. Reverse phase HPLC analysis was run through a Kinetex® C18-EVO column (Phenomenex®): 5 μm, 100 Å, 250 × 4.60 mm, stabilised at 35 °C and fitted to a SPD-M20A UV–vis detector (Shimadzu Co.) monitoring absorbance at 210 nm. A Loctite® LED flood array (Henkel Ltd.) operating at 405 nm was used to sterilise the samples studied in the bacterial growth experiment. A FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech GmbH.) microplate reader was used to incubate and measure the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) in the bacterial growth experiments. Pictures of agar plates were taken on a ChemiDoc™ MP imaging system (Bio-Rad laboratories Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Nucleosides and Nucleotides by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleosides and nucleotides were quantified by reversed-phase ion-pairing HPLC. Typically, 10 μL of diluted sample containing ∼1 mM of analyte were loaded on a Kinetex C18 EVO column (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany; 5 μm, 100 Å, 150 × 4.6 mm). Analytes were separated in 15-min long isocratic runs using 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 5.9, containing 40 mM tetra-n-butylammonium bromide. The flow rate was 0.25 mL/min and the temperature set to 35 °C. Eluting compounds were detected at 260 nm. A 15-min HPLC trace is shown in Supplementary Fig. 40. Typical retention times were as follows: Ψ (7.1 min), uracil (7.4 min), U (8.7 min), and ΨMP (13.5 min).
To analyze the reaction mixture of conversion of ΨMP to ΨTP, the HPLC method was adapted slightly. A Kinetex C18 column (Phenomenex; 5 μm, 100 Å, 50 × 4.6 mm) was used. The eluting buffer from above additionally contained 12.5% (by volume) acetonitrile. A 5-min long isocratic run at 2.0 mL/min flow rate was used. Under these conditions, the retention times were as follows (Supplementary Fig. 41): Ura (0.3 min), ΨMP (0.4 min), ΨDP (1.1 min), ADP (1.1 min), ΨTP (2.7 min), and ATP (4 min).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Cellular Nucleotide Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
dNTP and rNTP concentration (pmol/million cells) for activated CD4+T cells were collected from a previous study having 4 replicates, and the precalculated average was used to represent dNTP/rNTP ratios (41 (link)). The nucleotide samples were extracted based on the established protocol (42 (link)) with some modifications. To prepare the nucleotide samples, 2 × 106 cells of HEK293T or hESC-h9 were counted and centrifugated to obtain a cell pellet. The pellet was washed with PBS and then vortexing was performed for 2 min with 200 μl of cold 65% methanol for cell lysis. The cell mixture was incubated at 95°C for 3 min and then incubated on ice for 1 min to complete the cell lysis. By centrifugation at 14 000 rpm for 3 min, the supernatant containing nucleotides was isolated. To quantify the intracellular dNTPs and rNTPs, an ion pair chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method (43 (link)) was applied, with modifications. Chromatographic separation and detection were performed on a Vanquish Flex system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) coupled with a TSQ Quantiva triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Analytes were separated using a Kinetex EVO-C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 μm) (Phenomenex) at a flow rate of 250 μl/min. Pmol/million cells were calculated for rNTPs and dNTPs for all four replicates to calculate the ratios.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HPLC Analysis of Chemical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed
on an Agilent 1200 HPLC system (Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with
a Kinetex EVO C18 column (5 μm, 100 Å, 150 × 4.6 mm;
Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) and a UV detector. The column
temperature was 45 °C. The injection volume was 5–10 μL.
The eluent flow rate was 1 mL/min. The column was equilibrated in
water containing 0.1% formic acid. Elution was done with an increasing
gradient of acetonitrile (0.1% formic acid), starting from 10%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

HPLC Analysis of Nucleosides and Bases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleosides and bases were analyzed by HPLC (λ = 260 nm) using a reversed-phase Kinetex EVO C18 column (Phenomenex, Aschaffenburg, Germany) at 25 °C with a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. Substrates and products were identified by comparing their retention times with those of authentic standards. Quantification was performed using a six-step calibration from a serial dilution in the range from 0 to 1 mM over the peak area.
Gradual elution was performed using eluent A (20 mM ammonium acetate) and eluent B (100% acetonitrile). The following gradient was used: 97% A and 3% B; 10-min linear gradient to 60% A and 40% B. The initial condition (97% A and 3% B) was restored afterwards and maintained for 4 min.
Typical retention times were as follows: 1a: 3.2 min, 4a: 2.4 min, 1b: 4.7 min, 4b: 4 min, 3c: 7.5 min, 3d: 8.2 min, 2b: 7 min, 3a: 8.2 min, 3b: 8.8 min, and 2a: 7.6 min. The percentage of conversion of nucleosides was calculated as described previously (Equation (1)) [36 (link)].
Conversion %=Conc. of the product [mM]Conc. of the product [mM]+ Conc. of the substrate [mM]× 100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Analysis of Ophthalmic Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Within 1 month after surgery, the concentrations of brimonidine and brinzolamide in the samples were quantitatively assessed in an independent bioanalytical facility through liquid chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry (CMIC Pharma Science Co., Ltd., Hokuto, Japan). The analysis was performed using a Triple Quad5500 (AB Sciex Pte. Ltd., Framingham, MA, USA) and a Nexera Ultra High-Performance Liquid Chromatography system (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Gradient chromatography was carried out using a Kinetex EVO C18 column (inner diameter: 2.1 mm, length: 150 mm, and particle size: 5 μm; Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). 5-Chloro-6-(2-imidazolidinylideneamino) quinoxaline was utilized as the internal standard. The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium hydrogencarbonate buffer (pH 10.0) and methanol at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Brimonidine, brinzolamide, and the internal standard were examined in the positive ionization mode based on the following multiple reaction monitoring transitions: 292/212 (brimonidine); 384/136 (brinzolamide); and 248/205 (internal standard).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Phytohormones in Root Exudates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The endogenous phytohormones in crude root exudates were determined according to Prerostova et al. [67 (link)]. In brief, 50 uL aliquots of root exudates were spiked with stable isotope-labeled internal standards (1 pmol/sample) and directly used for LC/MS. The phytohormonal metabolites were separated on Kinetex EVO C18 column (2.6 µm, 150 × 2.1 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA). The mobile phase A contained 5 mM ammonium acetate and 2 µM medronic acid in water, while phase B consisted of 95 % (v/v) acetonitrile in water. The following gradient was used: 5% B in 0 min, 5–7% B (0.1–5 min), 10–35% B (5.1–12 min) and 35–100% B (12–13 min), followed by a 1 min hold at 100% B (13–14 min) and return to 5% B. Hormone analysis was done with an LC/MS system consisting of UHPLC 1290 Infinity II (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to 6495 Triple Quadrupole Mass Spectrometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), operating in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode, with quantification by the isotope dilution method. Data acquisition and processing was performed with Mass Hunter software B.08 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Techniques for Extracting and Separating Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A magnetic stirrer with a temperature controller from Selecta (Barcelona, Spain) was used for some separation phase steps. Centrifugation of the extracts was carried out by a Coulter Avanti J-25 centrifuge with a temperature controller (Beckman, Fullerton, USA). A rotatory evaporator Mod. LABOROTA 4000 from Heidolph (Schwabach, Germany) was used for the organic solvent evaporation. The 20 × 20 cm silica gel TLC plates with inorganic fluorescent indicator F254 from Merck Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) was used for separation steps. Nylon filters with a pore size of 20 μm and an inner diameter of 13 mm from Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA) were used to remove solid particles from the extracts before the LC analysis. A 15 Gold LC System from Beckman Coulter (Fullerton, USA) equipped with a 26 Gold DAD detector (wavelength range 190–600 nm) was used for individual separation and UV detection. The instrumental setup was controlled by the Karat 3.0.7 software, which also enabled data acquisition and processing. Chromatographic separation was carried out using a Kinetex® EVO C18 column (150 mm, 4.6 mm id, 2.6 μm particle size) from Phenomenex Inc. (Torrance, CA, USA), furnished with a 4.6 mm SecurityGuard™ ULTRA cartridges.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

ATP Purification and Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 100 μl ATP reaction was set up as described above except for the omission of α32P-ATP. The reaction mixture was incubated at 70°C for 20 min. After inactivation of the enzyme by incubation at 95°C for 5 min and subsequently cooling down on ice, the reaction mixture was loaded onto a Kinetex EVO C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA), which was pre-equilibrated with buffer A (5 mM ammonium acetate) at 30°C at 0.3 ml/min. The products were purified by stepwise elution with different concentrations of buffer B (100% acetonitrile): 0–2 min, 0% buffer B; 2–22 min, 20% buffer B; 22–25 min, 50% buffer B, 25–29 min 100% buffer B.
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry data were acquired using a micrOTOF-QII (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) in MS Scan mode from 100 to 2000 m/z in the negative ionization mode. The employed ESI parameters were as following: Cappilary voltage: 4.5 kV; End plate offset: -500, Nebulizer: 1.2 Bar, Dry Heater: 200°C, Dry Gas: 9 L/min, collision cell RF: 800 Vpp.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC Analysis of Glucose and Derivatives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were analyzed by reversed-phase HPLC according to the method described by Hollenbach et al., 2020 [24 (link)]. The HPLC system was equipped with a Kinetex EVO C18 column (2.6 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm) from Phenomenex (Aschaffenburg, Germany) with an accompanying guard column (4 × 3.0 mm ID) of the same phase using an Agilent (Waldbronn, Germany)1260 series liquid chromatograph equipped with a quaternary pump, an autosampler and a column oven. Analytes were detected using an evaporative light scattering detector from BÜCHI Labortechnik (Essen, Germany). The retention times were 2.1 min for glucose and 2.7 min for glucose monodecanoate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!