The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

128 protocols using rest 2009

1

Toxicity Assessment of Chemical Exposures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as mean ± SE unless otherwise indicated. Graphs were created in GraphPad Prism 8.3.0. Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism using one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s or Dunnett’s or post hoc Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s as appropriate for the normality of the data as measured by Shapiro–Wilk. qPCR data were analyzed using SDS 2.4 (ThermoScientific) and REST 2009 software (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) with statistical analyses performed using REST 2009 pairwise reallocation randomization test. Significant differences between single and co-exposures or positive controls and vehicle were determined using Student’s t-test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Analysis of AMS and SMS Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were normally distributed; they are reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD), whereas mRNA expression is reported as median of folding and interquartile range (IQR). As the main goal of this study was to compare AMS and SMS patients, SMS patients were used as reference group for mRNA folding measurement. Analyses of RNA relative expression were performed with the REST 2009 Software (http://www.qiagen.com/Products/REST2009Software.aspx?r=8042), that permits to use multiple reference genes for normalization, improving the reliability of results [20 (link)]. The expression ratio results are tested for significance by a Pair Wise Fixed Reallocation Randomisation Test.
Data of IDO activity were analyzed with ANOVA test and, when appropriate, with the Student’s t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of CCM1 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Real-time PCR (qPCR) assays were used to quantify the relative expression level of CCM1 in different tissues and cell lines using Power SYBR Green Master Mix with a primer-set for CCM1 (KRIT01F1: TGCATGCTGGTATGGAAAAG/KRIT01R1:CGTTTCTGGGTGGTTTAGGA) in a ViiA-7 Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems). TissueScan™ Real-Time PCR panels (HMRT100, 103, CSRT502) and human β-actin control primers (Origene) were used to determine the relative expression levels of CCM1 in multiple human tissues. Human brain tissues and cell-line qPCR plates were prepared using an epMotion 5075 automated liquid handling systems (Eppendorf). The qPCR data were analyzed with DataAssist (ABI) and Rest 2009 software (Qiagen). The relative expression level (2-ACT) was calculated from all samples and normalized to reference gene (β-actin). All experiments were performed with triplicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gene Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are represented as the mean ± SEM. The comparison between groups was done by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by a specific post-hoc test (Tukey's multiple comparison test). Statistical analysis was performed using REST 2009 (Relative Expression Software Tool, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) based on Pair Wise Fixed Reallocation Randomization Test (Pfafflet al., 2002). A level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative PCR Analysis of mRNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histograms represent mean ± standard deviation (SD) from 3 or more independent experiments. Unpaired Student’s t-tests or one-way ANOVA were performed using Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA), with significance set to p < 0.05. Relative mRNA expression was calculated and statistically analyzed using the comparative Ct method (2−ΔΔCt) and the Relative Expression Software Tool (REST-2009) (Qiagen Inc.) (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)). Whisker box plots generated by REST-2009 for relative mRNA expression demonstrate the median (midline inside the box), interquartile ranges 1 and 3 (upper and lower edges of the box), as well as maximum and minimum expression values (top and bottom whiskers) (Pfaffl et al., 2002 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

RNA Isolation and qPCR Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and ground in a mortar. Total RNA was isolated using the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Plus kit with TRI Reagent (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) and followed by DNase I treatment (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Lack of DNA contamination was verified by PCR and qPCR on the RT control. cDNA was synthesized from 1 µg of RNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was conducted using the StepOnePlus (Applied Biosystems) thermocycler with the Maxima SYBR Green/ROX qPCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Primers were validated for single product specificity and their effectiveness to range between 90 and 105% (Electronic Suppl. Table S1). qPCR thermal cycling conditions were: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 55 °C for 60 s. Amplification was followed by melt curve analysis to verify single product amplification. Normalization was done to the expression of the actin gene. qPCR reactions were done in at least three biological replications. Relative gene expression was calculated using the REST 2009 (Qiagen) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Progenitor Cell Differentiation Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Progenitor cells were cultured with and without hanging inserts in 12-well plates for 7 and 21 DIV before RNA extraction using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, 74106). Following cDNA synthesis from the RNA samples, qPCR reactions were set up using TaqMan gene expression assays for Tuj1 (Hs00801390_s1), KCC2 (Hs00221168_m1) and GABA A1 receptor subunit (Hs00971228_m1) using the CFX Connect™ Real-Time PCR Detection System (BioRad). Experiments were set up in triplicates. qPCR data from three experimental repeats were analyzed using REST 2009 (Qiagen) with Tuj1 as the reference gene. All values were normalized to the ‘no insert’ values for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimized qRT-PCR Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For qRT-PCR analysis, cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with oligo(dT)s, using 500 ng of total RNA for each sample. Three biological replicates and three technical replicates were used for each time point validation (nine replicates in total). Primers were designed based on SAS sequences using the Primer Express 2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) software, and only primers with an amplification efficiency between 90 and 110% were used (Supplementary Table S14). Reaction mixtures consisted of 5 μL of 1.5 μM primer mix, 1 μL of cDNA (diluted 1:10) and 6 μL of Fast SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Reactions were performed on 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). For primer SCSGLR1045D05.g, primer concentration was reduced to 312.5 nM. Expression ratio was estimated using REST 2009 (Relative Expression Software Tool, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as described in [107 (link)]. The endogenous genes for each tissue were identified using the geNorm software [108 (link)] (Supplementary Table S15).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Extraction, RT-qPCR Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells with a Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions [46 (link)]. RNA yield and purity were checked using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (EuroClone, Milan, Italy), and total RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus Reverse Transcriptase (Sigma-Aldrich). Real-time PCR was performed on a StepOne™ Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) using SensiFAST SYBR Hi-Rox (Bioline, LABGENE SCIENTIFIC SAZI, Châtel-Saint-Denis, Switzerland). The comparative Ct method (ΔΔCt) was used to quantify gene expression, and the relative quantification was calculated as 2−ΔΔCt. The presence of non-specific amplification products was excluded by melting curve analysis. Statistical analyses on real-time PCR data were performed using the Relative Expression Software Tool (REST2009, Qiagen, Venlo, The Netherlands) [47 (link)]. The forward and reverse primer sequences are shown in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4.1. Extracting RNA and cDNA synthesize
High pure RNA tissue kits were employed to extract total RNA as per the manufacturer's protocol (Roche, Switzerland). The reverse transcriptase of Moloney murine leukemia virus (Fermentas, Lithuania) was then used in the presence of RNase inhibitors and random hexamers for the transcription of 1 μg of total RNA into cDNA.
4.2. Quantitative Real-Time PCR According to Table-1, specific primers for MAP1ALC3, BECN1, CASP8, BAX, and TP53 genes were employed to perform quantitative real-time PCR considering GAPDH the internal control. Reactions were conducted by utilizing SYBR® Premix Ex Taq II (Takara, Japan) and a RotorGene™ 6000 machine (Qiagen, Germany).Moreover, initial denaturation was carried out for 15 minutes at 95°C followed by 40 denaturation cycles at the same temperature for five seconds in primer-specific conditions and extension for 20 seconds at 60°C. The candidate groups were compared in terms of the results of quantitative PCR in REST-2009 (Qiagen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!