The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistics 19

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Statistics 19.0 is a software package designed for statistical analysis. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data manipulation, visualization, and statistical modeling. The software is suitable for a wide range of applications, including business, finance, and scientific research.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

45 protocols using statistics 19

1

Comparison of Sham and Model Groups

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were analyzed using SPSS Statistics 19.0 software. Comparisons of data between sham and model groups were performed using independent sample t- tests or t′ - tests. The results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation ( X¯  ± s). A value of P < 0.05 represented statistical significance of differences between groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

One-way ANOVA for Statistical Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 19.0 software, and a one-way ANOVA was used to calculate significance. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and is indicated with one asterisk in figures.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed by SPSS Statistics 19.0 software. Statistical significance was examined by use of χ2 and Fisher's exact test. p < .05 was accepted as statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimizing Cell Culture Conditions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each experiment was repeated at least thrice, and presented as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was analyzed using one-way analysis of variance with a least significance difference test using SPSS Statistics 19.0 software using P < 0.05 as the level of significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Means

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical methods used included paired t-tests for comparison of mean values. All analyses were carried out using SPSS Statistics 19.0. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Various groups were compared for differences using one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA). All analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 19.0. A difference with a P-value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Biofilm and Adhesion Dynamics in A. baumannii

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The levels association of growth rate, biofilm and cell adhesion between A. baumannii ATCC 19606 and the mutant strains were analysed using the SPSS Statistics 19.0 software. According to the normality test and homogeneity of variances test, the levels of growth rate, biofilm and cell adhesion appear to be a normal distribution with equal variance, so all the data was adopted with analysis of variance (ANOVA) statistical test. The survival rate of mice was compared by Chi-Squared Test (Fisher probabilistic method). Statistical significance was established by using a conventional level of P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Validation of DEGs by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DEGs results were validated using qRT-PCR. The qRT-PCR assays were performed with three replicates, and the actin gene was used as an internal control to normalize the expression level of the target genes. The specific primers were designed according to the unigene sequences using Primer 5.0 software (Table S1).
Amplifications were performed on a 96-well plate with a 25 μL reaction volume containing 1 μL cDNA (50ng), 10 μL SsoFastTM EvaGreen® Supermix (BIO-RAD, CA, USA), 0.5 μL 10 μM of primers, and 13 μL of ddH2O. The PCR temperature profile was 95 °C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, 58 °C for 20 s and 72 °C for 20 s, with a 0.5 °C/5 s incremental increase from 60 °C to 95 °C. The relative copy number of mRNA was calculated according to the 2− ∆∆CT comparative CT method38 (link). Quantitative data were expressed as means ± SD. Two-side t test was used to compare expression levels. A probability level of 0.05 was used to indicate significance. All statistics were performed using SPSS Statistics 19.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were expressed as the mean±S.E.M. from at least three independent experiments. One- or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post-test was used to compare values among different experimental groups using the SPSS Statistics 19.0 program. Student's t-test and two-tailed Student's t-test were used for experiments that contain only two groups. A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, and a value of P<0.01 was considered highly significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Expression Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The films were scanned as gray scale 8-bit images and the density of bands were determined by the ImageJ software.The data of relative quantity in western blot are presented and the statistical analysis of variance between groups was performed by SPSS Statistics 19.0 software. Significant difference of all statistical tests was set at 0.05 (p<0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!