The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Hbf 306c

Manufactured by Omron
Sourced in Japan

The Omron HBF-306C is a body composition monitor that measures body fat percentage, body weight, and other body composition metrics. It provides users with detailed information about their overall health and fitness status.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using hbf 306c

1

Anthropometric and Pubertal Assessments in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height was measured using a Seca model 213 stadiometer and weight using a Seca model 813 digital scale (Seca, Chino, CA). Height and weight were used to determine body mass index (BMI; kg/m2). Children’s BMI was also reported by percentile according to age and sex. Body fat percentage was assessed by bioelectrical impedance assessment using an Omron HBF306C handheld body fat loss monitor (Omron Healthcare Inc., Lake Forest, IL). This model of BIA monitor has been shown to have reasonable accuracy in estimating body fat percentage in children (Jensky-Squires et al. 2008 (link)). BIA has previously been shown to be a reliable and practical method for estimating body fat percentage in children (Talma et al. 2013 (link)).
Parents completed a general demographic questionnaire and the Pubertal Development Scale. The Pubertal Development Scale was adapted from Carskadon and Acebo and assesses basic questions for the parents to answer regarding the child’s development toward puberty (Carskadon and Acebo 1993 (link)). The Freddy Fullness Scale was used to assess hunger levels as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The body weight (kg) and height (m) were measured using a digital balance (Seca 760, Hamburg, Germany) and a stadiometer (Seca 206, Hamburg, Germany); then, BMI was calculated (kg/m2), and participants were categorized according to their values (< 25/ > 25). Waist and thigh perimeters were measured using anthropometric tape as described elsewhere [12 ]. Other interesting variables related to body composition were assessed by the trained project assistants using a clinically validated body composition monitor by the bioelectrical impedance method (OMRON HBF-306C, Kyoto, Japan), including body fat (%), muscle mass (kg), visceral fat level and basal metabolic rate (kcal).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bioimpedance and Anthropometric Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMIp and BF% (measured with the Omron HBF-306C handheld bioimpedance monitor) were measured in privacy outside classrooms without shoes or jackets. Weights to the nearest tenth of a pound were collected using a Seca model 8761321004 scale. Heights in stocking feet were measured to the nearest 100th of an inch with a stadiometer (Seca Model 213, Hanover, MD).
BMIp was calculated using the school algorithm, including birth date, measurement date, height, and weight. 23 Four-point Quadscan bioimpedance and 24hour diet recall were measured in a subgroup. Pearson's correlation between the handheld and 4-point bioimpedance measurements was n = 123, r = 0.73, p < 0.001. Bioimpedance is safe, convenient for BC analysis, and reliable, 24 (link) with acceptable comparability with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in field studies. 25 (link) Data were kept on a password protected computer using only participant ID.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Body Composition Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Height, weight, body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), waist (inches), hip (inches), waist/hip ratio, and percent body fat (Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) with the Omron HBF306C handheld device)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Anthropometric Measurements in Icelandic Adults

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body weight was measured in light underwear/clothing on a calibrated scale (model no. 708, Seca, Hamburg, Germany) and height was taken from the Icelandic electronic hospital registry SAGA (TM software 3.1.39.9). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated from the height and weight (kg/m2). Participants were categorized into three BMI categories: low BMI < 23 kg/m2, middle BMI 23–30 kg/m2, or high BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 [24 ]. Body composition was measured using a hand-held bioelectrical impedance analysis device (BIA, Omron HBF-306C, Kyoto, Japan) [25 (link)]. Calf circumference was measured in a seated position. The tape was wrapped around the right calf and moved up and down to locate the maximum circumference in a plane perpendicular to the long axis of the calf [26 (link)]. Midarm circumference was also measured in a seated position and was taken on the left upper arm, at the mid-point between the tip of the shoulder and the tip of the elbow (olecranon process and the acromion) [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Health Assessments of Participants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the health status and energy balance of the participants, physical measurements were carried out on items of particular interest [4 ]. The participants’ height and waist–hip circumference were measured with a measuring tape, and their weight was measured with a scale (HD-660, Tanita Co., Tokyo, Japan). The BMI was calculated using the formula of weight (kg) divided by height squared (m2), and was categorised as follows: underweight for BMI < 18.5, normal weight for BMI 18.5–24.9, overweight for BMI 25.0–29.9, and obese for BMI > 30.0 [21 ]. Body fat percentage was measured using a handheld body fat monitor (HBF-306C, Omron Co., Tokyo, Japan). Blood pressure was measured using an upper-arm blood pressure monitor (HEM-7130-HP, Omron Co., Tokyo, Japan). Hypertensive individuals were those with systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 140 mmHg or higher and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 90 mmHg or higher, while those with severe hypertension were those with SBP of 160 mmHg or higher and/or DBP of 100 mmHg or higher [4 ]. As a proxy indicator of physical activity, step counts were measured using a wearable monitor over three consecutive dates, and average daily step counts were calculated (Fitbit Surge, Fitbit, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!