The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

39 protocols using lysotracker dnd 99

1

Lysosomal Activity Quantification by Flow Cytometry and Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated with LysoTracker DND-99 (100 nM; Thermo Fisher, Waltham, Massachusetts) during 1 hr at 37°C. Cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature (RT) for 1 hr. Fluorescence was analyzed using a CytoFLEX Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California). More than 10,000 events per sample were recorded. The analysis was performed using the FlowJo software.
LysoTracker staining was also analyzed using a Leica TCS SP5 Confocal System. Briefly, cells were washed twice with PBS after incubation with LysoTracker DND-99 (1 µM), fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 hr at RT, stained with DAPI (1 µg/mL, Thermo Fisher) during 10 min mounted on a glass slide using Fluoromount mounting medium (Thermo Fisher). Quantification of LysoTracker staining was performed using Icy software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Visualizing IgG1 Trafficking in FcRn-expressing Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HMEC1-hFcRn-EGFP cells were seeded in eight-well NuncTM Lab-TekTM chambered Coverglass imaging dishes (ThermoFisher Scientific), and grown to 50–70% confluency. WT and IHH hIgG1 variants were conjugated with Alexa-647 following the manufacturer’s procedure (Life Technologies). Cells were washed three times with HBSS pH 6.0 and Alexa-647 conjugated antibodies, diluted in HBSS pH 6.0 to the final concentration of 400 nM, were added to the cells and incubated for 4 h before pictures were taken. The cells were then washed three times with HBSS pH 7.4, and incubated in HBSS pH 7.4 for 4 h before pictures were taken. Lysotracker DND-99 (Life Technologies) was added to the cells 30 min before pictures were taken. Confocal images were acquired on an Olympus FluoView 1000 inverted microscope equipped with a PlanApo 60/1.42 oil objective (Olympus). Constant temperature was set to 37 °C and CO2 to 5% by an incubator enclosing the microscope stage. Image acquisition was done by sequential line scanning to eliminate bleed-through. Images were processed and prepared with ImageJ (NIH), Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator (Adobe system Inc). Co-localization was quantified using Imaris spot co-localization software (Bitplane) where the endosome size was set to 1 µm. Data from two independent experiments with 15–20 cells analysed were used for co-localization analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Osteoclastogenesis Regulation by WDFY3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cell incubations were performed in culture medium consisting of αMEM with 2mM L-glutamine, 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 IU/ml Penicillin and 100 IU/ml Streptomycin (Life Technologies, 10007D). Mouse soluble RANKL (R&D Systems, 462TR) and M-CSF ELISA (R&D Systems, DY416), were used for in vitro experiments. CMG14-12 (CMG) media was generated as described before [22 ]. Anti-Wdfy3 (Abnova, clone 2F12), anti-WDFY3 (Novus, NBP1-03332), anti-SQSTM1 (Progen, GP62-C), LC3 antibody (Novus, NB100-2220), anti-β-actin antibody (Cell Signaling, 4970), 800 or 680 secondary antibodies (Li-Cor) were used for in vitro experiments. Cyto-ID kit (Enzo biochem, ENZ-51031) was used for autophagosome staining. LysoTracker DND-99 was used for lysosome staining (Life Technologies, L-7528).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanoparticle Uptake Visualization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For confocal microscopy studies, RAW 264.7 cells were seeded at 10,000 cells/well in an 8-well culture slide (Lab-Tek) and maintained at 37 °C. After adhering, fluorescein-labeled nanoparticles at a final concentration of 1.5 mg/mL in culture media were added to the wells and allowed to incubate for 4 h or 24 h at 37 °C. Culture media used in nanoparticle experiments contained FBS (as indicated in the cell culture section) unless otherwise noted. After incubation, cells were washed with media to remove unbound nanoparticles and then stained with lysotracker DND-99 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) according to manufacturer instructions, in order to confirm endosomal/lysosomal uptake of the nanoparticles. Following staining, cells were imaged with Olympus FV1000 confocal microscopy (Center Valley, PA). Semi-quantitative fluorescence measurements were taken using ImageJ to determine total fluorescent area and intensity of the green channel normalized to the red channel within each field of view (n=3). Results of the PEGylated and non-PEGylated hollow and solid nanoparticles were then compared to determine relative nanoparticle uptake rates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Confocal Microscopy of Nanoparticle Uptake in RAW 264.7 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For confocal microscopy studies, RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in 8 wells culture plates and maintained at 37 °C. Samples were performed in triplicate. RAW 264.7 cells incubated with fluorescein labeled nanoparticles were incubated for 4 h or 24 h at 37 °C in culture medium. Culture media used in nanoparticle experiments contained FBS (as indicated in the cell culture section) unless otherwise noted. After washing with medium to remove any unbound nanoparticles, the cells were imaged using confocal microscopy (Olympus BH-2). Cell samples were subjected to the trypan blue dye exclusion method to check cell viability. Lysotracker DND-99 (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) staining was performed according to the manufacturer’s protocol to confirm that nanoparticles were taken up into endosomal/lysosomal intracellular compartments. Semi-quantitative fluorescence measurements were used to compare uptake between PEGylated and non-PEGylated nanoparticles. Image analysis by ImageJ determined the number of fluorescent pixels (area) and the integrated fluorescence intensity for the green channel normalized to the red channel within each field of view (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Visualizing Lysosomal Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The acid vesicles were labeled with LysoTracker DND-99 (Life Technologies, Molecular Probes) using cells cultured overnight on 35 mm glass bottom culture dishes (MatTek Corporation, Ashland, MA). The cells were rinsed in PBS, incubated with 75 nM of LysoTracker DND-99 in DMEM for 30 minutes. The cells were rinsed with PBS and treated or not with 0.5% 1-butanol or 0.5% tert-butanol. The cells were examined with a Leica TCS-SP5 scanning confocal microscope (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Real-time Imaging of NK Cell Cytotoxicity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Target cells were labeled with DiD cell labeling solution (Life Technologies) according to manufacturer instructions and cultured on poly-l-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) coated Delta T dishes (Bioptechs Inc.) for 1 h at 37°C in phenol free RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS. NK92.p46.GFP effector cells were loaded with 1 μM of LysoTracker DND-99 (Life Technologies) for 30 min, washed, and re-suspended in phenol free RPMI medium containing 200 IU/mL IL-2. Target cells were placed on a heated Delta T stage adapter with a heated lid, and time-lapse images (6 frames/min) of random fields containing target cells were acquired. After imaging had commenced, effector cells were introduced at a 2:1 effector:target ratio. Images were collected on a Nikon Eclipse Ti fluorescence microscope equipped with a CSU-X1 spinning disk confocal head (Yokogawa), Nikon 100X oil objective (NA 1.4), and an XR/MEGA-10 intensified CCD camera (Stanford Photonics). The system was controlled with Micro-Manager software (44 (link)). Nikon Perfect Focus was used to correct drift during time-lapse acquisition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Visualizing smORF Peptide Localization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S2 cells were cultured in 10% FBS (v/v) Schneider’s media at 25°C to a confluent stage. Transfections and staining protocols were carried out as described in Pueyo et al. (2016b) (link). We used primary rabbit and mouse anti-Flag antibody (1:500; Sigma) and secondary Donkey anti-mouse FITC (1:1000; Jackson ImmunoResearch), anti-mouse Rhodamine (1:400;Jackson ImmunoResearch) and anti-rabbit Cy5 (1:400; Jackson ImmunoResearch) for detection of tagged-smORF peptides. For detection of mitochondria S2 cells were incubated in 500 nM Mitotracker Red CMXRos (Life Technologies) for 45 min and then fixed for immunohistochemistry. For Lysosome colocalization experiments, cells were incubated in Lysotracker-DND99 (1:1000; Molecular Probes) for 15 min, then mounted and observed in vivo. Images of 5–10 cells per transfection culture were captured on the LSM510 Axioskop 2 or on the Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscopes. For colocalization analysis Z-stack images were taken and analysed with the ImageJ plugin “Mander’s Coefficients” which was used to calculate Pearson’s correlation coefficient of tag to tag signal in 2 different channels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunofluorescence Microscopy for Autophagy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IF microscopy cells were plated on poly-L-lysine coverslips (1,5-2 x105 cells /slide). When the appropriate treatments were finished, slides were washed once with PBS, fixed with 4% PFA for 20mins (RT) re-washed twice with PBS, refixed and permeabilized with 100% ice cold MetOH for 10mins (RT) and blocked with 2% BSA in 0,1% saponin (BS). Primary antibodies were left for 1hr at RT or O/N at 4°C. Slides were washed several times with BS and the secondary antibodies were incubated for 1hr at RT. Antibodies used were mouse anti-LC3B (1:20, 5F10 nanoTools), rat anti-Lamp-1 (1:400, 1D4B Abcam), rabbit anti-p62 (1:500, MBL), rabbit anti-TFEB (1:100, 954604 R&D Systems) followed by incubation with Alexa fluor® 555 anti-mouse IgG (1:500, Molecular Probes), Alexa fluor® 488 anti-rabbit IgG (1:500, Molecular Probes), Alexa fluor® 633 anti-rat IgG (1:250, Molecular Probes). For visualization of the nuclei DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich) was used. Samples were mounted with Mowiol and visualized using inverted confocal live cell imaging system Leica SP8.
For Mitotracker CMXRos and Lysotracker DND-99 (Molecular Probes) stainings, dyes were added in culture as suggested by the manufacturer, washed, fixed with 4% PFA for 20mins (RT), and mounted for immediate observation under the microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Antibody Panel for Autophagy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-S. pneumoniae (SSI), anti-GFP (Cell Signaling), anti-Myc (9B11, Cell Signaling), anti-Flag (Wako), anti-Galectin-3 (SINO BIOLOGICAL), anti-Calcoco2 (Proteintech for WB), anti-NDP52 (Gene Tex (GTX115378) for IF), anti-K63 linked Ub (clone Apu3, EMD Millipore), anti-LC3, p62, RFP, Atg16L1, ubiquitin (MBL), and anti-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) were used as primary antibodies. An HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse antibodies (Jackson Laboratories) were used as secondary antibodies for immunoblotting. FITC- or TRITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as secondary antibodies for immunostaining. DAPI (4′,6-diamidino- 2-phenylindole, Sigma-Aldrich) was used for DNA staining. LysoTracker DND-99 was purchased from molecular probes. 10 µM rapamycin and 40 µM chloroquine (Selleck chemical), and 30 µM PYR-41 (UBPBio), and 10 mM 3-methyladenine (3-MA, Wako) were used as autophagy inducer or inhibitor. 300 µM Apocynin (Selleck), 10 mM GSH (Cayman Chemical), 2.5 mM NAC (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as antioxidative reagents. All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. All antibodies were used at 1:100 for immunofluorescence staining and 1:1000 for western blotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!