The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

22 protocols using ab32420

1

Immunoblotting of Cell Cycle Regulators

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were separated with SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane. The following antibodies for immunoblotting: BMAL1 (1:2000, NB100-2288, Novus Biologicals), CLOCK (1:2000, NBP1-51610, Novus Biologicals), γH2AX (1:2000, 9718, CST), ATM pS1981 (1:5000, ab81292, Abcam), ATM (1:5000, ab32420, Abcam), RAD51 (1:4000, ab133534, Abcam), ATR (1:5000, ab2905, Abcam), ATR pT1989 (1:1000, GTX128145, GeneTex), RPA1 (1:1000, sc-28304, Santa Cruz), Flag (1:1000, D191041, Sangon Biotech), GAPDH (1:5000, 60004-1-Ig, Proteintech), HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit or anti-mouse (KPL, Inc) were used as secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying ATM and pRAD50 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded blocks were sectioned at 3 μM. Haematoxylin–eosin staining was performed on all sections using Mayer’s haematoxylin by a standard automated protocol. Standard automated IHC protocols were used for primary antibody detection of total ATM at a dilution of 1:50 (ab32420; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and pRAD50 (Ser-635) at a dilution of 1:100 (14223; Cell Signalling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA) for all samples. 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine horseradish peroxidase-activated chromogen (760-159; Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) was used to visualise positive staining in single-plex staining for both ATM and pRAD50 with a haematoxylin counterstain. Haematoxylin–eosin and IHC sections were imaged with an Aperio AT2 Scanscope Console (version 102.0.7.5; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany).
Histological evaluation and quantitative analysis of ATM- and pRAD50-positive cells were conducted by a senior imaging scientist and IHC images were analysed and quantified by using H score analysis algorithms performed on all IHC tissue sections with HALO artificial-intelligence image analysis software (version 3.32541.323; Indica Labs, Albuquerque, NM, USA). Data visualisation was carried out with Prism (version 9.0.2; GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

IHC Analysis of RAD51C and ATM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IHC analyses, biological samples were sliced in 4-μm-thick sections, deparaffinized in xylene, and rehydrated through decreasing concentrations (100%, 95%, 80%, and 70%) of ethyl alcohol, then rinsed in distilled water. Antigen retrieval was carried out using preheated target retrieval solution for 30 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in distilled water. Slides were treated with 1% BSA and 2% FBS in PBS and then incubated in a closed humid chamber overnight at 4°C with anti-RAD51C (1:1,000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, PA5-75307) or anti-ATM antibody (1:100 in case of cell lines; 1:500 in case of PDOs, Abcam ab32420). The antibody binding was detected using a polymer detection kit (GAR-HRP, Microtech) followed by a diaminobenzidine chromogen reaction (Peroxidase substrate kit, DAB, SK-4100; Vector Lab). All sections were counterstained with Mayer’s Hematoxylin (Diapath, C0305) and visualized using a bright-field microscope (Leica DM750).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were first lysed (Solarbio, Beijing, China) and then denatured in SDS buffer to obtain total protein. The protein was separated on a 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel (30 mg per lane) and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Merck Millipore, MA, USA). After blocking in 5% skim milk for 1 h, the membrane was incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C and then incubated with the secondary antibody (1:15,000, GE Healthcare, Cambridge, UK) for 1 h at room temperature. Then, visualization was performed with ECL chemiluminescence reagent (Merck Millipore, MA, USA).
The antibodies used in this study were as follows: CRABP2 (1:1,000, ProteinTech, Cat. # 10225-1-AP), BAX (1:1,000, Abcam, ab32503), BCL-2 (1:1,000, Abcam, ab32124), cleaved caspase-3 (1:1,000, Abcam, ab32042), PARKIN (1:1,000, ProteinTech, Cat. # 14060-1-AP), ATR (1:1,000, Abcam, ab2905), p-ATR (1:1,000, Abcam, ab178407), ATM (1:1,000, Abcam, ab32420), p-ATM (1:1,000, Abcam, ab81292), P53 (1:1,000, Abcam, ab32389), p-P53 (1:1,000, Abcam, ab33889), TET1 (1:1,000, Abcam, ab272900), DNMT3A (1:1,000, Abcam, ab188470), DNMT3B (1:1,000, Abcam, ab2851), P62 (1:1,000, ProteinTech, Cat. # 18420-1-AP), TOMM40 (1:1,000, Abcam, ab185543), α-tubulin (1:5,000, Abcam, ab7291), β-actin (1:5,000, ProteinTech, Cat. # 66009-1-Ig), GAPDH (1:20,000, ProteinTech, Cat. # 60004-1-Ig).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibody Detection in DNA Damage Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antibody against BHRF1 was a gift from Jaap Middeldorp (VU University Medical Centre, The Netherlands). Antibodies against BZLF1 and BRLF1 were purchased from Argene (bioMérieux SA, Marcy l'Etoile, France). The rabbit monoclonal antibodies against phospho‐ATM (ab81292), ATM (ab32420), and the anti‐HA tag (1:5000 dilution; ab9110) rabbit polyclonal antibody were purchased from Abcam. The anti‐γ‐H2AXser139 antibody was purchased from EMD Millipore (Quincy, MA, USA). The antibodies against CHK2 (#3440) and phospho‐CHK2 (#2197) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). All of the AlexaFluor‐conjugated and HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Molecular Probes (New York, NY, USA). The HRP‐conjugated secondary antibodies were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). Western blot analysis was performed as previously described 24 and all the primary and the secondary antibodies used is 1:1000 and 1:5000 in dilutions unless otherwise specified. The signal intensity was measured by ImageJ software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ATM and Phospho-ATM in Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PC tissue samples were fixed in 10% formalin (FUJIFILM) and embedded in paraffin. Staining was performed on 4 μm-thick sections, which were incubated at 4 °C overnight with rabbit anti-ATM (1:100; Cat. No. ab32420, Abcam) or rabbit anti-phospho S1981-ATM (1:100; Cat. No. ab81292, Abcam) as the primary antibody. In non-neoplastic cells, ATM expression was observed in islets and lymphoid cells, whereas phospho-ATM expression was observed in nerve cells, both of which served as internal controls. As a negative control, normal rabbit IgG (Cat. No. IS600, Dako, CA, USA) was used instead of the primary antibodies. ATM and phospho-ATM expression in cancer cells was evaluated visually by two pathologists (KH and TF) and classified into three grades according to the intensity of staining: score 0, null expression; score 1, faint expression; score 2, evident expression. A faint expression (score 1) was considered when the staining intensity was lower than that in adjacent internal controls (normal islet cells or nerve cells) on the same section, whereas an evident expression (score 2) was considered when the staining intensity was higher than or equal to that in the internal controls. Low ATM/phospho-ATM expression was assigned a score of 0, whereas high ATM/phospho-ATM expression was assigned scores of 1 and 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Phospho-ATM Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts were obtained at 3, 5 and 7 days of no treatment or treatment with 50 μg/ml CDV. Whole cell lysates were prepared in Ripa buffer (Thermo Scientific, Brussels, Belgium) containing protease (Complete Mini, EDTA-free, Sigma-Aldrich, Diegem, Belgium) and phosphatase inhibitors (Active Motif, La Hulpe, Belgium). Protein concentrations were measured by the BCA assay (Thermo Scientific). Separation of proteins was performed with SDS-PAGE. Western Blot analysis was performed with anti-phospho-ATM (Ser1981) clone 10H11.E12 (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and anti-ATM antibody (ab32420, Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Relative quantification was performed using actin (ab3280, Abcam) as a loading control. For each blot, the sum of intensity values was calculated and used for normalization of the values per blot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Mouse Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice brains were gained to fix in 4% paraformaldehyde and dehydration with graded sucrose. After that, the brain was cut into 20 μm through a cryostat microtome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Brain slices or primary microglia were moistened in 3 times with 1 × PBS and permeabilized with 0.25% Triton X‐100 for 20 min, and then blocked with 2% BSA (4240GR250, BioFroxx) for 2 h and incubated with primary antibody: anti‐Iba1 (ab5076, Abcam), anti‐P65 (8242, Cell Signaling Technology), or anti‐ATM (ab32420, Abcam) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, microglia or slices were immersed in secondary antibody: Alexa 488 goat anti‐Iba1, Alexa 594 rabbit anti‐P65 or Alexa 647 rabbit anti‐ATM (A32814/A32754/ A32795, Invitrogen) for 1–2 h at 37°C. The nuclear was stained with DAPI (BD5010, Bioworld Biotechnology) for 10–15 min. Images were obtained by Olympus BX51 (Japan) fluorescence microscope and analyzed with ImageJ (ImageJ 1.5, NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction and Western Blotting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins were extracted using Complete Lysis buffer containing proteases inhibitors (04719956001 Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and phosphatase inhibitors (04906845001 Roche). Protein lysates were separated by NuPage 4–12% Bis-Tris Gel (NP0335BOX Invitrogen) under reducing conditions. Western blotting (WB) was carried out according to standard techniques, with rabbit anti-pATM (phospho S1981) ab81292, anti-ATM ab32420, and anti-b-tubulin (HRP) ab21058 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA). Immunoreactive proteins were detected by ECL Prime (GE Healthcare, RPN2232) and a chemiluminescence gel documentation and analysis system (MINI HD, UVITEC, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antibody Validation for Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used in this study are listed as follows: DNA-PKcs (ab32566, Abcam, UK, 1:5000), phosphorylated DNA-PKcs (ab124918, Abcam, 1:5000), phosphorylated ATM (ab81292, Abcam, 1:5000), ATM (ab32420, Abcam, 1:5000), PI3KCA (ab124918, Abcam, 1:1000), phosphorylated histone H2AX (2577, Cell Signaling Technology, USA, 1:500 for IB, 1:100 for IHC), H2AX (7631, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), IRF9 (76684, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), eIF-2α (5324, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), phosphorylated eIF-2α (3398, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), JNK (9252, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), phosphorylated JNK (9255, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), PERK(3179, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), CHOP (2895, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), Ki-67 (9449 s, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:400), cleaved-Caspase-3 (9664 s, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000 for IB, 1:500 for IHC), Caspase-3 (9662, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1000), CD4 (25229, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:200), CD8 (98941, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:400), GAPDH (AP0063, Bioworld, USA, 1:10000), α-tubulin (ARG65693, Arigo Biolaboratories, China, 1:5000), β-tubulin (AP0064, Bioworld, 1:10000), M1 E1 and NS3 (produced by Beijing Protein Innovation, China, 1:2000). Anticancer compounds used in this study were purchased from Selleckchem.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!