The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using anti cd34

1

Protein extraction and characterization of exosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein in HUVECs was extracted with RIPA buffer containing PMSF (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The supernatant of the lysis and exosome derived from HCT116 and SW480 was quantified with a BCA kit. Then, more details are provided below [11 (link)]. The following antibodies were used: anti-CD9 (Abcam, ab263019); anti-CD63 (Abcam, ab134045); anti-TSG101 (Abcam, ab125011); anti-CD34 (Proteintech, 14,486–1-AP); anti-Integrin β1 (Proteintech, 12,594–1-AP); anti-VEGFA (Proteintech,19,003–1-AP); anti-PDK2 (Abcepta, AP7039b); anti-Akt (Abcam, ab179463); anti-p-Akt (Ser473); anti-GAPDH (Proteintech, 60,004–1-Ig). IF and IHC was performed as previously described [11 (link)]. IF was performed using anti-CD34 (Proteintech, 14,486–1-AP). Then, the image of IF was obtained using the LSM880 confocal microscope system (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). IHC was performed using anti-CD31 (Proteintech, 11,265–1-AP) and anti-CD34 (Proteintech, 14,486–1-AP). The images of IHC were acquired using a fluorescence microscope system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Tumor Angiogenesis via IHC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue-embedded sections were washed repeatedly in xylene (three times), 100% ethanol (two times), 70% ethanol (two times) and water (two times) for 10 min. The sections were then boiled in sodium citrate buffer for 1 h. The peroxidase blocker was added drop wise for 10 min, and tissues were incubated with the primary antibody at 4 °C overnight. The primary antibodies used were anti-CD34 (cat:14486-1-AP, Proteintech, China, 1:100) and anti-HMGB3 (cat:D160490, Sangon Biotech, China, 1:50). The reaction enhancer and the secondary antibody were added drop wise on the following day, and tissues were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. HMGB3 and CD34 expression were observed using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine, and samples were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. In brief, we measured the MVD, by dividing each xenograft into three layers and cutting three tissue slices from each layer. MVD was evaluated as previously described by Foote30 (link). We found areas with a high MVD under a low magnification (40×). Then, single microvessels were counted in three fields under a magnification of 200× or 400×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Tissue Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh tissues were immobilized with 4% formalin for 48 h at 37°C and subsequently washed with cool phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times for 5 min each time. Tissue samples were dehydrated using ethanol, embedded in paraffin, and then cut them into 4-μm-thick sections of 2 mm diameter to produce TMAs. The paraffin sections were dewaxed in an incubator at 65°C overnight, before being deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated using a decreasing ethanol gradient. Sections were placed in ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (cat.no. 0085; Beyotime) and heated in a microwave for 10 min for antigen repair. A 3% hydrogen peroxide was used to eliminate endogenous peroxidase at 37°C for 30 min. Sections were incubated with anti-HNRNPC (dilution 1:50, cat. no. ET1611-2; HUABIO), anti-ki67 (dilution 1:10000, cat. no. 27309; Proteintech), anti-CD34 (dilution 1:50, cat. no. ET1606-11; HUABIO), anti-Vimentin (dilution 1:100, cat. no. ET1610-39; HUABIO), and anti-E-Cadherin (dilution 1:50, cat. no. ET1607-75; HUABIO) antibodies at room temperature overnight, and then with secondary antibody (dilution: 1:1, cat.no. K5007; Dako) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, sections were stained with an IHC kit (cat. no. K5007; Dako) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of CD34

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight, paraffin-embedded, and cut into sections (5-μm-thick). After sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated, they were heated for antigen retrieval. Next, sections were washed for 5 min, and 3% H2O2 was used to incubate the samples for 25 min. Then, samples were blocked and incubated for 30 min after washed for 5 min. Afterwards, primary antibodies (anti-CD34, 1:400; Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA) were applied to stain the samples overnight. Samples were then incubated with secondary antibody (HRP-labeled) for 30 min. Color was developed by DAB. The antibodies were bought from Abcam. The tissues were observed under a fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of Angiogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed following a previously described method [30 (link)]. The following antibodies were used: anti-CD34, anti-VEGF, anti-DNMT1, anti-TRAF1, and anti-NF-κB p65 (Proteintech, Wuhan, China). Staining intensity was scored manually by two independent experienced pathologists as follows: 0 = no staining, 1 = weak staining, 2 = moderate staining, and 3 = strong staining. The percentage of positive cells was also assessed according to four scores: 1 (0-10%), 2 (11-50%), 3 (51-80%), and 4 (81-100%). The final IHC score was calculated by multiplying the intensity score by the percentage of positive cells. CD34 antibody was used to stain vascular endothelial cells, and then the microvessel density (MVD) was calculated. The field of maximal CD34 expression was found in tumor tissues. Within this field, the area of maximal angiogenesis was selected, and microvessels were counted at 200× magnification. Low MVD was indicated by scores from 0 to 3. High MVD was indicated by scores ≥4 [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological and Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Vasculature

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, tissue sections (5 µm) were deparaffinized using xylene, rehydrated in gradient ethanol, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin according to manufacturer’s instructions. The HE staining results were taken to avoid tumor necrosis and edge photographs as far as possible.
For IHC analysis, tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, incubated in endogenous peroxidase inhibitor, and blocked with goat serum working solution (all at room temperature). Subsequently, they were incubated with anti-CD34 (Proteintech Group) followed by incubation with a secondary antibody conjugated with HRP. Detection of CD34 distribution was conducted by 3,3’-diaminobenzidine and hematoxylin. Two independent pathologists who were blind to the clinical data of the patients evaluated the IHC photos. The microvessel density (MVD) in each specimen was evaluated by counting anti-CD34 positive microvessels and calculated by the method described by Weidner et al. [47 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Angiogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC was performed following a previously descrih2ed method [27] . The following antih2odies were used: anti-CD34 (Proteintech; 14486-1-AP), anti-VEGF (Proteintech; 19003-1-AP), Staining intensity was scored manually h2y two independent experienced pathologists as: 0 = no staining, 1 = weak staining, 2 = moderate staining, and 3 = strong staining. The percentage of positive cells was also assessed according to four scores: 1 (0%-10%), 2 (11%-50%), 3 (51%-80%), and 4 (81%-100%). The nal IHC score was calculated h2y multiplying the intensity score h2y the percentage of positive cells. Low expression of VEGF was for scores from 0 to 5. The ones with scores ≥ 6 were considered high expression [28] . CD34 antih2ody was used to stain vascular endothelial cells and then calculated microvessal density (MVD). The eld of maximal CD34 expression was found in tumor tissues. Within this eld, the area of maximal angiogenesis was selected, and microvessels were counted on a 200×magni cation eld. Low expression of MVD was for scores from 0 to 3. The ones with scores ≥ 4 were considered high MVD [29] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!