The largest database of trusted experimental protocols
Protocol comparator

Save time and reduce experimental failures

AI semantic search
To identify the most similar setups from millions of protocols sourced from publications, preprints and patents.
Breakdown protocols
into critical steps to visualize variables.
Detect Reproducibility insights
such as positive and negative controls.
Strictly comparative functionality:
Unlike LLMs like ChatGPT cannot interpret, invent or hallucinate
Top 20 full text protocols
A modified Bruker Vertex 70 is used for FTPS EQE spectra. The device was connected with the current amplifier (SR570) to amplify the signal from the device. The data is calibrated with the standard Si and Ge detector. SR303i spectrometer is used to measure the EL. The spectrometer is attached with the newton EMCCD-Si and iDus InGaAs array detector. During the measurement, EMCCD was kept at −40 °C and InGaAs detector kept at −60 °C. The bias of the EL measurement was applied on the devices using a Keithley 2400 Source Meter. The spectrum was calibrated with the standard light source. EQEEL values were obtained from an in-house-built system including a Hamamatsu silicon photodiode 1010B, a Keithley 2400 Source Meter to provide voltage and injected current, and a Keithley 485 Picoammeter to measure the emitted light intensity.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Idoxuridine Light Medical Devices Silicon
FTPS-EQE was measured using Vertex 70 from Bruker Optics, equipped with a quartz tungsten halogen lamp, quartz beam splitter and external detector option. A low-noise current amplifier (SR570) was used to amplify the photocurrent produced on illumination of the photovoltaic devices with light modulated by the Fourier-transform infrared spectroscope (FTIR). The output voltage of the current amplifier was fed back into the external detector port of the FTIR, to be able to use the FTIR’s software to collect the photocurrent spectrum.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Eye Halogens Light Medical Devices Quartz Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Tungsten
FTPS-EQE measurement was performed at a Vertex 70 from Bruker Optics, which equipped with a quartz tungsten halogen lamp, quartz beam-splitter and external detector option. The amplification of the photocurrent product was achieved by using a low-noise current amplifier (SR570) on the illumination of the photovoltaic devices with light modulated by the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The external detector port of the FTIR gathered the signals from the current amplifier for output voltage. A Keithley 2400 SourceMeter was used for supplying voltages and recording injected current, and a Keithley 485 picoammeter was used for measuring the emitted light intensity.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Eye Halogens Light Medical Devices Quartz Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared Tungsten
The EQE of each device was measured with monochromatic light (SM-250F, Bunkoh-Keiki). The light intensity was calibrated with a standard Si and InGaAs photodetector. The photocurrent was recorded using a lock-in amplifier (LI5640, NF) with a low-noise current amplifier (DLPCA-200, FEMTO). The lock-in frequency was 85 Hz. For measurements with a reverse bias, the DC voltage output of the current amplifier was used.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Light Medical Devices
All measurements are performed in continuous wave mode in order to achieve stable operation conditions. For the integral measurements of the bias-dependent intensity plot in Fig. 2c, the samples are mounted on a probe, which is put directly in a liquid helium Dewar to efficiently cool the devices and to obtain a reproducible and stable temperature, which is important for continuous wave operation. The emitted intensity is measured using a Ga-doped Ge detector. The spectral measurements are performed using a Bruker Vertex 80 FTIR spectrometer with a resolution of 2.25 GHz. The emitted light is recorded with an attached pyroelectric deuterated triglycine sulfate detector. The sample is mounted in a liquid helium cooled flow cryostat, attached to the spectrometer.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2014
Helium Light Medical Devices Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared triglycine sulfate
EL spectra and quantum efficiency were measured on a REPS Pro system (Enlitech) with a Keithley 2400 external current/voltage source meter connected to support an external electric field. FTPS-EQE was recorded on a FTPS (PECT-600) system (Enlitech), where a low-noise current amplifier was employed to amplify the photocurrent generated from the photovoltaic devices with illumination light modulated by the Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) instrument.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2022
Electricity Light Medical Devices
The EQE measurements were conducted by a commercially available QE‐R system from Enlitech (with greater than ≈99.5% repeatability). A Xenon lamp was installed in the system. The light was then directed into a monochromator for single wavelength beam output. The wavelength step was set to 5 nm to obtain accurate measurements. The single wavelength light beam was directed onto the active area of the device. The illumination was modulated via a chopper (165 Hz) which was connected to a lock‐in amplifier, thereby ensuring that the device output photovoltage signal frequency was synchronized for accurate signal recording. The temperature of the measurement state was set to 25 °C using a temperature controller. The averaging sampling rate during data acquisition was set to 15, while the allowed noise range was set to 5E‐4 for precise measurements. Prior to the EQE measurement, the system was calibrated against two reference photodetectors: Si photodetector from 300 to 1100 nm (Enlitech Model RC‐S103011‐E) and Ge photodetector from 1100 to 1200 nm (Enlitech Model RC‐G108018‐E). The signal‐to‐noise ratio of the two reference photodetectors is given in Figure S17 in the Supporting Information. The EQE repeatability of separate devices is shown in Figure S5 in the Supporting Information. The IQE was calculated by the following equation
IQE=EQE/Absorption where the absorption results in Figure 3b were utilized. The spectral responsivity Rλ was determined by
Rλ=EQE×λ×ehc where λ is the wavelength of photons, e is the elementary charge, h is Plank's constant, and c is the vacuum light speed.
Current–voltage (I–V), capacitance–voltage (C–V), and temporal response with on/off illumination were measured using a Keithley 4200 semiconductor analyzer. Diode lasers (Thorlabs) of different wavelengths (515, 780, and 980 nm) were properly aligned and focused onto the device region. The measured photocurrents by using the Keithley 4200 semiconductor analyzer (0.1 fA rated noise measurement with two remote amplifiers (4225‐RPM) for ultra‐low current measurement) also confirmed the high EQE results. The incident laser beam was calibrated by a sensitive optical power meter (Thorlabs PM200, with a S120C photodiode power sensor for power levels down to nanowatts). The photocurrents (linear region) in Figure 4d and the correspondingly calculated responsivity were consistent with the measured high EQE results as per the relationship given in Equation (4).
The photocurrent Iph was calculated by
Iph=IlightIdark where Ilight is the current under illumination and Idark is the dark current.
The specific detectivity D* was calculated by
D=RλS2eIdark where S is the effective area of the photodiode.
For temporal response measurements, fiber‐coupled diode lasers at 515 and 1060 nm wavelengths (Thorlabs LP515‐SF3 and Qphotonics QFBGLD‐1060‐10BTF) were mounted into laser mounts, which were connected to a laser driver (Thorlabs LDC 210C) and a temperature controller (Thorlabs TED 200C). A function generator (Hewlett Packard 33120A) was connected to the laser driver, to impress a square signal to modulate the laser frequency at 1000 Hz. The photovoltage of the devices was recorded by a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix MDO3024).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2022
Fibrosis Fingers Lasers, Semiconductor Light Medical Devices Vacuum Vision Xenon
The EL measurements were performed using an Andor SR-303i-B spectrometer equipped with a silicon (Si) (DU420A-BR-DD) and an indium–gallium–arsenide (InGaAs) (DU491A-1.7) detector. Voltage was supplied by a Keithley 2400 source meter and was typically 1 V. For some low signal devices, the voltage was raised up to 3 V in order to get enough EL response. To prevent device heating when the EL signal was measured in the near-IR, the voltage was pulsed for 90 s. The voltage used was the same throughout the entire spectrum (for the silicon and germanium detectors) and then the final continuous EL spectrum was obtained, after subtraction of the dark background signal.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2020
Gallium gallium arsenide Germanium Indium indium arsenide Medical Devices Silicon
Spectra of the sample are recorded using a Bruker Vertex 80 FTIR spectrometer with a resolution of 2.25 GHz, using an pyroelectric deuterated triglycine sulfate (DTGS) detector. The device is mounted in a liquid-helium-cooled-flow cryostat that is optically coupled to the spectrometer via parabolic mirrors. For LIV measurements, the light intensity L is acquired by feeding the FTIR-detector output (internal DTGS detector) into a lock-in amplifier (Stanford Research Systems SR830) and measuring the signal at the modulation frequency of 10 Hz. The current flowing through the device is measured with a coaxial current probe (Tektronix CT-1), which is connected to the output of a voltage pulser (HP8114A). The measurement data of the current I and voltage V are acquired using a digital oscilloscope (Tektronix DPO 3032).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2020
Fingers Helium Light Medical Devices Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared triglycine sulfate
Highly sensitive EQE was measured using a integrated system (PECT-600, Enlitech), where the photocurrent was amplified and modulated by a lock-in instrument. EQEEL measurements were performed by applying external voltage/current sources through the devices (ELCT-3010, Enlitech). All of the devices were prepared for EQEEL measurements according to the optimal device fabrication conditions. EQEEL measurements were carried out from 0 to 2 V).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Medical Devices
EQEEL values were obtained from an in-house-built system including a Hamamatsu silicon photodiode 1010B, a Keithley 2400 SourceMeter to provide voltage and record injected current, and a Keithley 485 Picoammeter to measure the emitted light intensity.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2019
Light Silicon
Devices are fabricated as outlined in the device fabrication part. FTPS-EQE measurements were carried out using a Vertex 70 from Bruker optics, equipped with QTH lamp, quartz beam splitter and external detector option. A low noise current amplifier (DLPCA-200) was used to amplify the photocurrent produced upon illumination of the photovoltaic devices with light modulated by the FTIR. The output voltage of the current amplifier was fed back to the external detector port of the FTIR, in order to use the FTIR's software to collect the photocurrent spectrum.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2016
Eye Light Medical Devices Quartz Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
Highly sensitive EQE was measured using an integrated system (PECT-600, Enlitech), where the photocurrent was amplified and modulated by a lock-in instrument. EQEEL measurements were performed by applying external voltage/current sources through the devices (ELCT-3010, Enlitech).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
Highly sensitive EQE was measured using an integrated system (PECT-600, Enlitech), where the photocurrent was amplified and modulated by a lock-in instrument. EQEEL measurements were performed by applying external voltage/current sources through the devices (ELCT-3010, Enlitech).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2023
Medical Devices
FTIR spectra were taken on an IFS-66V/S FTIR spectrophotometer. TEM and HRTEM images were obtained measured on a JEM-2100F transmission electron microscope. XPS measurements were performed on an ESCALAB250 spectrometer. UV-vis absorption spectra were measured on a UV-2600 (Shimadzu) spectrophotometer, and PL spectra on a FLS920P fluorescence spectrometer. Absolute PL QYs were measured on an Edinburgh FLS820-s spectrometer with a calibrated integrated sphere. 1H NMR spectra were obtained at room temperature on a Zhongke Niujin AS400 (400 MHz, 1H) instrument. TRPL measurements were conducted on a time-dependent single photon counting system based on the FLS920P Edinburgh spectrometer with an excitation wavelength of 365 nm. TA spectra were measured using a femtosecond transient absorption pump-probe spectrometer (Ultrafast Systems LLC) with a pump wavelength of 365 nm. XRD patterns were obtained on a Bruker D8 Advance X diffractometer with Cu Kα Source (λ = 1.5406 Å). SEM images were collected on a Hitachi SU8000 SEM (Hitachi Limited, Tokyo, Japan) under 5 kV acceleration voltage. UPS measurements were performed on a PREVAC system. LED performance was evaluated using the commercially available system (SHENZHEN PYNECT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Co, Ltd.), with current density-voltage characteristics been recorded on a Keithley 2400 source meter, and light-output measurements on a fiber integration sphere coupled with a QE Pro spectrometer.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
The current density-voltage and photon count intensity-voltage characteristics of the devices were measured by using a Keithley 2400 (Keithley instruments Inc.) and FLS920 (Edinburgh Instrument). The absorption spectra was measured in the wavelength range of 300–900 nm with a UV-vis spectrophotometer (U-3310 UV-vis HITACHI). The decay kinetics was measured by FLS920. All measurements were done at room temperature under ambient air.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2015
Kinetics Medical Devices
To perform FI-ESR measurements, a transistor was attached and wire-bonded to a substrate holder with source, drain, and gate connections. The device-and-boat combination was lowered into a tube appropriate for ESR measurements and sealed under nitrogen using a rubber cap. The electrode wires were punctured through the cap in order to connect to the voltage source, and the puncture sites were sealed with epoxy to preserve vacuum.
All EPR measurements were taken on a Bruker E500 spectrometer using a Bruker ER 4122SHQE cavity and an X-band microwave source. An Oxford Instruments ESR900 cryostat controlled by an Oxford Instruments Mercury iTC was used for temperature-dependent spectra, and a Keithley 2602b source unit was used for electrical characterization. CustomXepr, a Python package developed by ref. 18 (link), was used to integrate data collected by these instruments and to automate measurements when desired.
Full text: Click here
Publication 2024
EPR measurements were performed in
a standard X-band Bruker ELEXSYS E500 spectrometer. The microwave
power used in the experiment was kept below the signal saturation
limit. All EPR spectra were obtained in dark at room temperature and
are normalized to film detection volume.
Full text: Access full text.
Publication 2019
DC ELQE was measured by a calibrated silicon photodiode (Thorlabs, FDS10X10), which was directly attached to the device. Two separate source measure units (SMUs) were used for applying voltage to the device and reading photocurrent from the photodiode, respectively. For AC measurement, a pulse generator (HP 8114A) applied voltage pulses (2 Hz, 500 ns duration) with a load resistance (RL) of 47 Ω. EL was measured using a biased Si photodiode (Thorlabs, DET100A2, rise time of 35 ns), connected to a current amplifier (FEMTO, DHPCA‐100) with a set gain of 103 V A−1 and bandwidth of 200 MHz. Considering a limited diameter of photodiode (9.8 mm) and its distance to the emissive device (4.4 mm), a correction factor was applied to the measured EL flux (assuming Lambertian emission). Voltages applied to before and after RL (V1 and V2, respectively) and output of the current amplifier were read by an oscilloscope (Rohde&Schwarz HMO3004). To avoid the permanent damage to the device, the measurement with a photodiode was performed over the limited V2 range of 0–30 V. Then, the device was moved to the spectrometer setup and V2 was swept over 0–40 V (V1 of 0–70 V). EL spectrum was measured at each voltage using a spectrometer equipped with an array of cooled charge‐coupled devices (CCDs), with a long integration time of 20 s to compensate the low duty cycle of the pulse. The photon flux at V2 > 30 V was plotted using the area of EL spectrum, which was calibrated with the data using a photodiode at the same condition. The SMUs and oscilloscope were controlled with the software SweepMe! (sweep‐me.net).
Full text: Click here
Publication 2021
Medical Devices Pulse Rate Pulses Silicon
EPR spectra were acquired on a Brüker EMX X-band spectrometer at 77 K using a quartz finger dewar, at 3.6 to 20 K using an Oxford Instruments liquid helium cryostat, or at 293 K using an aqueous flat cell. All spectra were acquired at 9.3–9.9 GHz, 100 kHz modulation frequency. Other acquisition parameters for dimanganese-Y• NrdF were: 1) at 77 K, 1 mW power, 1.5 G modulation amplitude, 2.52 × 104 gain, 10.24 ms time constant; 2) at 20 K, 0.2 mW power, 4 G modulation amplitude, 2.52 × 104 gain, 5.12 ms time constant; and 3) at 3.6 K, 0.1 mW power, 4 G modulation amplitude, 1.26 × 104 gain, 20.48 ms time constant. Other parameters for FeIII2-Y• NrdF at 77 K were 50 μW power, 1.5 G modulation amplitude, 2.52 × 103 gain, 5.12 ms time constant. At 293 K, the parameters for NrdIsq were 6.3 mW power, 1.26 × 104 gain, 1.5 G modulation amplitude, 10.24 ms time constant, and for FeIII2-Y• NrdF, 8.0 mW power, 1.26 × 104 gain, 1.5 G modulation amplitude, 10.24 ms time constant (23 (link)).
Full text: Access full text.
Publication 2010
Cells Electron Spin Resonance Spectroscopy Fingers Helium Quartz

We found 0 results to your query

Try another search with keywords variations such as synonyms, singular, plural, etc.

Sorry, we encountered an error

Filters

Date

2010 2025

Relevance score

0 95

Number of shortcut citations

0 1

Select up to 5 protocols to launch an AI Comparison