Two-hundred and two participants were consecutively recruited at four neurosurgery/neuro-orthopaedic clinics in Sweden between 2009 and 201212 (link),13 (link), of which 201 underwent surgery (mean age 50; SD 8.4 years, 52% men, neck pain median duration 14 months; arm pain median duration 12 months; IQR 16). The inclusion criteria were: age 18–70 years, persistent radiculopathy symptoms for at least two months, clinical findings of nerve root compression based on examination by a neurosurgeon/neuro-orthopaedic surgeon and compatible with verified cervical disc disease determined by magnetic resonance imaging, and undergoing surgery for CR by either anterior approach (ACDF) or posterior approach with foraminotomy/laminectomy at one to three segmental levels. The exclusion criteria were: myelopathy, previous fracture or luxation of the cervical column, malignancy or spinal tumour, spinal infection, previous surgery in the cervical column, systematic disease or trauma that contraindicated either the rehabilitation programme or the measurements, diagnosis of a severe psychiatric disorder (such as schizophrenia or psychosis), known drug abuse and lack of familiarity with the Swedish language (unable to understand and answer the questionnaires). Of the 201 participants who underwent surgery, 163 were operated on with ACDF using standard cages (i.e. filled with bone substitute or autologous bone collected during decompression; no iliac crest graft was taken) at the clinic where the participant was included. In most cases of multilevel surgery, an anterior plate was added to achieve primary stability. Thirty-eight patients underwent posterior foraminotomy, with or without laminectomy (without fusion). Eight participants did not fulfil the clinical neurological examination at baseline and were excluded from this secondary analysis of outcomes. Thus, the present cohort consisted of 193 participants (Table 1). A total of 153 (79% response rate) and 135 (70% response rate) participants completed the clinical examination at one- and two-year follow-up (Fig. 1). Of the participants attending one-year follow-up, 83 (46%) were men and mean age was 50 (SD 8.2). At the two-year follow-up, 72 (53%) were men and mean age was 50 (SD 8.3). There was no difference in background variables or preoperative neurological outcomes between the patients who attended the neurological clinical examination at follow-up and those who were lost to follow-up (p > 0.194). Patients attending clinical examination at follow-up scored NDI mean value 21 (SD 16.7) at one-year follow-up, and 23 (SD 18.3) at two-year follow-up. There was also no difference in background variables or neurological outcomes at baseline between participants randomized to SPT or SA (p > 0.08) (Table 1).
Background variables for participants with cervical radiculopathy who underwent surgery and postoperative rehabilitation and were included in the secondary analysis of postoperative neurological outcomes.
N
Total
SPT (N = 97)
SA (N = 96)
Age, mean (SD)
193
50 (8.4)
50 (8.3)
50 (8.6)
Sex male, n (%)
193
100 (52)
48 (50)
52 (54)
Anterior surgery, n (%)
193
155 (80)
73 (75)
82 (85)
NDI %, mean (SD)
184
43 (14.9)
42 (14.5)
44 (15.4)
Neck pain mm VAS, mean (SD)
188
56 (24.3)
55 (24.9)
57 (23.8)
Arm pain mm VAS, mean (SD)
185
50 (28.0)
52 (26.5)
48 (29.5)
Neurological impairment prick touch, n (%)
193
154 (80)
78 (80)
76 (80)
Neurological impairment light touch, n (%)
193
138 (72)
70 (72)
68 (71)
Neurological impairment motor function, n (%)
191
150 (79)
80 (83)
70 (74)
Neurological impairment arm reflex, n (%)
186
109 (59)
50 (53)
59 (64)
Positive Spurling test, n (%)
142
91 (64)
49 (67)
42 (61)
Results are presented with mean value and standard deviation (SD) or number (n) and percentage (%).
Flow chart of participants included in the analyses of secondary neurological outcomes.
Peolsson A., Löfgren H., Dedering Å., Kristedal M., Öberg B., Zsigmond P, & Wibault J. (2023). Neurological outcomes after surgery and postoperative rehabilitation for cervical radiculopathy due to disc disease: a 2-year-follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Scientific Reports, 13, 3830.
Type of surgical approach (anterior vs. posterior)
dependent variables
Neurological outcomes (prick touch, light touch, motor function, arm reflex, Spurling test)
control variables
Neck pain (VAS)
Arm pain (VAS)
Neck Disability Index (NDI)
Neurological impairment at baseline
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required