Evaluating Peripheral Artery Disease Care Strategies
This study evaluated distinct strategies of care in three treatment groups: (i) optimal medical care (OMC), (ii) supervised exercise rehabilitation (SE), and (iii) stent revascularization (ST). A fourth treatment group that combined ST and SE was dropped after enrolling 8 participants upon the recommendation of the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) in order to enhance enrollment in treatment groups that were part of the primary endpoint. Randomization was performed using a real-time web-based randomization system in a 2:2:1 ratio (ST:SE:OMC) (half as many enrolled in OMC because the treatment effect between the other groups and OMC was assumed to be much larger than between SE and ST). Randomization was stratified by geographic region and cilostazol use at baseline. Optimal medical care was established via active promotion of the standards established by the intersocietal 2005 ACC-AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease in order to promote best practices for risk factor management; use of antiplatelet therapy; and use of claudication pharmacotherapy. All study participants received cilostazol (Pletalâ„¢, Otsuka America, Inc., San Francisco, CA) 100 mg by mouth twice daily as tolerated. In addition, OMC included advice about the use of home exercise and diet in the form of standardized verbal instructions as well as printed material (Krames Staywell, San Bruno, CA). Cardiovascular risk factor data were collected and feedback provided to the sites by a central risk factor committee. Risk factors were then managed directly by the local study site. Supervised exercise consisted of 26 weeks of exercise, three times a week, for an hour at a time. Sites were trained to provide SE using a common protocol and progress of each participant was monitored by an oversight committee (23 (link)). Stent revascularization was done to relieve all hemodynamically significant stenoses (>50% by diameter) in the aorta and iliac arteries using FDA-approved self-expanding or balloon-expandable stents. The protocol allowed for femoropopliteal endovascular revascularization to treat any additional focal lesions, but this was not done for any study participant. Intra- or post-procedure oral antiplatelet medication use was at the discretion of the operator.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Other organizations :
Baim Institute for Clinical Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston University, Rhode Island Hospital, University of Missouri–Kansas City, Providence College, National Institutes of Health, Henry Ford Health System
Treatment group (ii) supervised exercise rehabilitation (SE)
Treatment group (iii) stent revascularization (ST)
dependent variables
Primary endpoint (not explicitly mentioned)
control variables
Cilostazol use at baseline (stratification factor for randomization)
Geographic region (stratification factor for randomization)
positive controls
Optimal medical care (OMC) as a control group
negative controls
The fourth treatment group that combined ST and SE was dropped after enrolling 8 participants upon the recommendation of the Data Safety and Monitoring Board (DSMB) in order to enhance enrollment in treatment groups that were part of the primary endpoint
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required