We would like to note that the CrI might have been underestimated for Alphacel, since we used a simple drying process instead of solvent-exchange drying, which might have given numbers more representative of the swollen state in the liquid broth. However, the measured differences have found to be less of an issue at high CrIs [41 (link)]. The CrIs of the MCCs were thus probably less affected, and that of Avicel was well in line with previously reported values [58 (link)].
Solid-state 13C NMR Analysis of Cellulose
We would like to note that the CrI might have been underestimated for Alphacel, since we used a simple drying process instead of solvent-exchange drying, which might have given numbers more representative of the swollen state in the liquid broth. However, the measured differences have found to be less of an issue at high CrIs [41 (link)]. The CrIs of the MCCs were thus probably less affected, and that of Avicel was well in line with previously reported values [58 (link)].
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Technical University of Munich
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Crystallinity index (CrI) of cellulose samples
- Solid-state 13C NMR spectrometer (Bruker Avance™ III 200)
- Cross-polarization magic angle spinning (CPMAS) with 13C-resonance frequency of 50.32 MHz and spinning speed of 5 kHz
- Contact time of 1 ms and recycle delay of 2 s
- Approximately 5000 scans accumulated with no line broadening applied
- Tetramethylsilane used for calibration of 13C chemical shifts and set to 0 ppm
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!