Analyses were conducted with the use of Stata 12 software.32 Prevalence estimates were weighted to represent the U.S. adult and youth populations. Variances were estimated with the method of balanced, repeated replications,33 with Fay’s adjustment set to 0.3 to increase the stability of estimates.34 The logit-transformation method was used to calculate confidence intervals. The tables show 95% confidence intervals for point estimates. The prevalences of product awareness and use of each product type, use of any cigar, use of smokeless tobacco including snus pouches, and use of any tobacco were computed according to the use categories shown in Table S1 in the Supplementary Appendix as they pertained to adults and youths, stratified according to age group (12 to 14 years, 15 to 17 years, 18 to 24 years, or ≥25 years). Among adults, the prevalence of current regular use (cigarettes) or current use (other tobacco products) was also stratified according to sex, age, race or ethnic group, sexual orientation, educational attainment, total annual household income, and U.S. Census region. Among youths, the prevalences of ever use and use in the previous 30 days were also stratified according to sex, age, race or ethnic group, sexual orientation (asked of those ≥14 years of age), educational level, and U.S. Census region. The prevalences of overall and product-specific single-product use and multiple-product use were determined in the entire adult study population, in the entire youth study population, among adult tobacco users, and among youth tobacco users. Among adult multiple-product users and separately among youth multiple-product users, all combinations of tobacco products used were determined, and each combination that accounted for at least 1% of multiple-product users is presented.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Kasza K.A., Ambrose B.K., Conway K.P., Borek N., Taylor K., Goniewicz M.L., Cummings K.M., Sharma E., Pearson J.L., Green V.R., Kaufman A.R., Bansal-Travers M., Travers M.J., Kwan J., Tworek C., Cheng Y.C., Yang L., Pharris-Ciurej N., van Bemmel D.M., Backinger C.L., Compton W.M, & Hyland A.J. (2017). Tobacco-Product Use by Adults and Youths in the United States in 2013 and 2014. The New England journal of medicine, 376(4), 342-353.
Other organizations :
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Office of Science, Food and Drug Administration, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Westat (United States), National Institutes of Health, Medical University of South Carolina, American Legacy Foundation, National Cancer Institute
Prevalence of use of smokeless tobacco including snus pouches
Prevalence of use of any tobacco
Prevalence of current regular use (cigarettes) or current use (other tobacco products) among adults, stratified by sex, age, race or ethnic group, sexual orientation, educational attainment, total annual household income, and U.S. Census region
Prevalences of ever use and use in the previous 30 days among youths, stratified by sex, age, race or ethnic group, sexual orientation (for those ≥14 years of age), educational level, and U.S. Census region
Prevalences of overall and product-specific single-product use and multiple-product use in the entire adult study population, in the entire youth study population, among adult tobacco users, and among youth tobacco users
Combinations of tobacco products used among adult multiple-product users and youth multiple-product users
control variables
None explicitly mentioned
positive controls
None mentioned
negative controls
None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required