CheckMate 9ER: Nivolumab and Cabozantinib
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Cancer Research UK, National Health Service, University College London, The Royal Free Hospital, Queen Mary University of London, Institut Gustave Roussy, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Hospital Universitario Dr José Eleuterio Gonzalez, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Washington University in St. Louis, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Ospedale San Donato, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Hospital São Lucas da PUCRS, Instituto Oncológico de Córdoba, University of Bari Aldo Moro, University of Pavia, Instituto Tecnológico de Querétaro, Cabrini Hospital, Monash University, University of Colorado Denver, Niigata University, Keio University, University of Tübingen, Cancer Research And Biostatistics, Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom), Exelixis (United States), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Center for Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Protocol cited in 17 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Treatment regimen: nivolumab combined with cabozantinib vs. sunitinib monotherapy
- Disease progression
- Toxic effects
- IMDC prognostic risk score (0 [favorable] vs. 1 or 2 [intermediate] vs. 3 to 6 [poor])
- Geographic region (United States and Europe vs. the rest of the world)
- Tumor expression of the PD-1 ligand PD-L1 (≥1% vs. <1% or indeterminate)
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!