Ischemic Stroke Classification by TOAST

Baseline demographic and clinical data, including age, sex, medical history, blood pressure, serum glucose, and treatment with intravenous thrombolysis were all prospectively collected. The stroke severity was evaluated with the NIHSS score (range from 0 to 42) score at their admission by a stroke neurologist. In this study, ischemic stroke was classified into 3 subtypes according to the TOAST criteria: large artery atherosclerosis (LAA), cardiogenic embolism (CE), and other causes.

Free full text: Click here

Deng G., Tang Y., Xiao J., Chen X., Chu Y.H., Shang K., Zhou L.Q., Qin C., Wang F, & Tian D.S. (2023). Naïve-memory regulatory T cells ratio is a prognostic biomarker for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15, 1072980.

Publication 2023

Artery Atherosclerosis Blood pressure Embolism Glucose Intravenous treatment Ischemic stroke Neurologist Serum Stroke Thrombolysis

Corresponding Organization : Tongji Hospital

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Intravenous thrombolysis treatment

dependent variables

Stroke severity (NIHSS score, range 0-42)
Ischemic stroke subtype (large artery atherosclerosis, cardiogenic embolism, other causes)

control variables

Medical history
Blood pressure
Serum glucose

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!