The PSC 4-Marker Immunocytochemistry Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to analyze SSEA4, OCT4, SOX2, and TRA-1-60 expression for iPSCs. An anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (ab150114, 1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and an anti-rat Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (A-21434, 1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used as alternative secondary antibodies for SSEA4 and SOX2 staining. Unless otherwise specified, the Immunofluorescence Application Solutions Kit (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions for marker staining after the differentiation of iPSCs into eMPCs and ECs. For eMPCs, immunofluorescence analysis for α-SMA (ab7817, 1:100, Abcam) and Brachyury (AF2085, 1:20, Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was performed. For Brachyury staining, cells were permeabilized and blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 10% normal donkey serum. For ECs, endothelial marker expression at passage #1 was evaluated by the staining of CD31 (3528S, 1:800, Cell Signaling), VE-Cadherin (2500S, 1:400, Cell Signaling), and VWF (MA5-14029, 1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific). An anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (ab150114, 1:200, Abcam), an anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (A-21429, 1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and an anti-goat Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (ab150130, 1:200, Abcam) were used as secondary antibodies. DAPI or Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used for nuclei staining.
Differentiation of iPSCs into Endothelial Cells
The PSC 4-Marker Immunocytochemistry Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to analyze SSEA4, OCT4, SOX2, and TRA-1-60 expression for iPSCs. An anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (ab150114, 1:500, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and an anti-rat Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (A-21434, 1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used as alternative secondary antibodies for SSEA4 and SOX2 staining. Unless otherwise specified, the Immunofluorescence Application Solutions Kit (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions for marker staining after the differentiation of iPSCs into eMPCs and ECs. For eMPCs, immunofluorescence analysis for α-SMA (ab7817, 1:100, Abcam) and Brachyury (AF2085, 1:20, Bio-Techne, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was performed. For Brachyury staining, cells were permeabilized and blocked in 1% bovine serum albumin, 0.3% Triton X-100, and 10% normal donkey serum. For ECs, endothelial marker expression at passage #1 was evaluated by the staining of CD31 (3528S, 1:800, Cell Signaling), VE-Cadherin (2500S, 1:400, Cell Signaling), and VWF (MA5-14029, 1:66, Thermo Fisher Scientific). An anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (ab150114, 1:200, Abcam), an anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (A-21429, 1:500, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and an anti-goat Alexa Fluor 555 antibody (ab150130, 1:200, Abcam) were used as secondary antibodies. DAPI or Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were used for nuclei staining.
Corresponding Organization : MSH Medical School Hamburg – University of Applied Sciences and Medical University
Other organizations : Leibniz Institute for Plasma Science and Technology
Variable analysis
- Differentiation protocol (iPSC to eMPC and EC)
- Passages of differentiated ECs
- Expression of pluripotency markers (SSEA4, OCT4, SOX2, TRA-1-60) in iPSCs
- Expression of eMPC markers (α-SMA, Brachyury) in eMPCs
- Expression of endothelial markers (CD31, VE-Cadherin, VWF) in differentiated ECs
- Cell seeding density
- Cell culture media and supplements (Essential 8 Flex, STEMdiff Endothelial Expansion Medium, ROCK inhibitor Y-27632)
- Immunofluorescence staining protocols (primary and secondary antibodies, permeabilization, blocking)
- Positive control: iPSCs for pluripotency marker analysis
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!