Among all years, focal area sites had a mean of 54.0% grassland cover at the local (250-m buffer) scale and a mean of 51.9% grassland cover at the landscape (2,500-m buffer) scale (95% of all stops/routes between 5.4% - 92.2% and 32.7% - 73.7%, respectively). Among all years, paired area sites had a mean of 50.1% grassland cover at the local scale and a mean of 50.0% grassland cover at the landscape scale (95% of all stops/routes between 3.6% - 92.5% and 29.4% - 72.0%, respectively). Percent grassland was generally similar among focal and paired site pairings (
Grassland Cover Quantification from Cropland Data Layer
Among all years, focal area sites had a mean of 54.0% grassland cover at the local (250-m buffer) scale and a mean of 51.9% grassland cover at the landscape (2,500-m buffer) scale (95% of all stops/routes between 5.4% - 92.2% and 32.7% - 73.7%, respectively). Among all years, paired area sites had a mean of 50.1% grassland cover at the local scale and a mean of 50.0% grassland cover at the landscape scale (95% of all stops/routes between 3.6% - 92.5% and 29.4% - 72.0%, respectively). Percent grassland was generally similar among focal and paired site pairings (
Corresponding Organization : University of Missouri
Other organizations : Missouri Department of Conservation
Variable analysis
- Percent grassland cover at two scales around survey locations (local scale: 250-m buffer around survey points [~20 ha], landscape scale: 2,500-m buffer around survey routes [~21563 ha])
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the provided information.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!