Light stimulation was performed using a white LED following the protocol described in Miyai et al. (2019) (link). Dark and light adaptation was performed in four steps, and the light intensity was switched from weak to strong. Electroretinographic waveforms were recorded and sampled, and the data were analyzed by using a Diagnosys digital acquisition system. The waveforms of ERG were measured from trough to peak (Lazarou et al., 2015 (link)), and the values of ERG amplitudes were compared among the four groups.
Electroretinography for Retinal Light Damage
Light stimulation was performed using a white LED following the protocol described in Miyai et al. (2019) (link). Dark and light adaptation was performed in four steps, and the light intensity was switched from weak to strong. Electroretinographic waveforms were recorded and sampled, and the data were analyzed by using a Diagnosys digital acquisition system. The waveforms of ERG were measured from trough to peak (Lazarou et al., 2015 (link)), and the values of ERG amplitudes were compared among the four groups.
Corresponding Organization : Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality
Variable analysis
- Intraperitoneal injection
- Retinal light damages
- Electroretinogram (ERG) amplitudes
- Dark adaptation duration (24 h)
- Anesthesia
- Pupil dilation (phenylephrine hydrochloride and tropicamide)
- Electrode placement (corneal surface, base of the tail, nasal part)
- Light stimulation protocol (white LED, dark and light adaptation steps, light intensity range)
- Baseline ERG measurements before intraperitoneal injection and retinal light damages
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!