A total of 386 patients (including 69, 44, 110, and 163 patients collected from MSKCC, UNMC, GELA, and SMC databases, respectively) were identified from these four databases based on the following specific selection criteria: 1) histologies consistent with the inclusion criteria of PROPEL; 2) patients who received at least two lines of prior therapy (ie, the second line of therapy would match with patients receiving pralatrexate on PROPEL, which required one line of prior therapy); and 3) patients who had not received pralatrexate. The efficacy data were not part of the criteria to select patients for inclusion in the historical database.
Real-World Evidence of PTCL Treatment
A total of 386 patients (including 69, 44, 110, and 163 patients collected from MSKCC, UNMC, GELA, and SMC databases, respectively) were identified from these four databases based on the following specific selection criteria: 1) histologies consistent with the inclusion criteria of PROPEL; 2) patients who received at least two lines of prior therapy (ie, the second line of therapy would match with patients receiving pralatrexate on PROPEL, which required one line of prior therapy); and 3) patients who had not received pralatrexate. The efficacy data were not part of the criteria to select patients for inclusion in the historical database.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Other organizations : Samsung Medical Center
Protocol cited in 1 other protocol
Variable analysis
- Center (MSKCC, UNMC, GELA, SMC)
- Overall survival (OS)
- Histologies consistent with the inclusion criteria of PROPEL
- Patients who received at least two lines of prior therapy
- Patients who had not received pralatrexate
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!