For fecundity measurements, the same experimental flies as those used for life spans were kept in the same glass vials for between 18 and 24 hours; they were then transferred to fresh food. The eggs in the vacated vials were counted manually under a microscope. For the sugar concentration experiment, egg counts were performed on days 3, 7, 10, 14, and 21 of treatment. For the first yeast comparison experiment (SYBaker’s, SYBrewer’s, and SYTorula), eggs were counted on days 5, 9, 12, 16, 19, 23, 26, 30; for the second experiment (SYBaker’s, SYBrewer’s, SYExtract and CSYExtract), eggs were counted on days 4, 8, 11, 15, 18, 22, 25, and 29. Eggs were counted on days 3, 6, 10, 13, 17, 26, 31, and 38 for the water add-back experiment and on days 4, 11, 18, 25, 32, 46, and 60 for the agar concentration range experiment. As an index of lifetime fecundity, the sum of eggs laid during 24 hours on the days of counting by an average female was calculated. These sampling points cover the period of heaviest laying, and are therefore indicative of relative lifetime fecundity (6 ).
Drosophila Lifespan and Fecundity Assays
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University College London, UCL Australia
Protocol cited in 39 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Food treatment (SYBaker's, SYBrewer's, SYTorula, SYExtract, CSYExtract)
- Sugar concentration
- Agar concentration
- Lifespan
- Fecundity (number of eggs laid)
- Larval rearing density (standard density)
- Larval food (1.0 SY food)
- Mating duration (48 hours)
- Adult density (10 females per vial)
- Environment (temperature, humidity, etc. - not explicitly mentioned)
- Positive control: SYBaker's and SYBrewer's yeast treatments, as they were tested in both batches of the yeast comparison experiment
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!