Volumetric Brain Imaging Using 3T MRI

Volumetric studies were based on magnetic resonance images acquired on a Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla scanner at the University of Utah. At time point 1, an 8-channel, receive-only RF head coil was used to acquire sagittal 3D MPRAGE T1-weighted images (inversion time=1100ms, echo time=2.93ms, repetition time=1800ms, flip angle=12degrees, field of view=56mm, slice thickness=1.0mm, 160 slices). No subjects in the current study underwent sedation for scanning. No complications were encountered in the scanning process. Additional neuroimaging details previously have been published (see Prigge et al., 2013a (link); 2013b ).

Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link: Access Free Full Text.

Trontel H.G., Duffield T.C., Bigler E.D., Abildskov T.J., Froehlich A., Prigge M.B., Travers B.G., Anderson J.S., Zielinski B.A., Alexander A., Lange N, & Lainhart J.E. (2015). Mesial Temporal Lobe and Memory Function in Autism Spectrum Disorder: An Exploration of Volumetric Findings. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 37(2), 178-192.

Publication 2015

Trio 3.0 Tesla scanner

Echo Head Inversion Sedation Trio

Corresponding Organization : University of Utah

Other organizations : University of Wisconsin–Madison, Harvard University, McLean Hospital

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Independent variables not explicitly mentioned.

dependent variables

Volumetric studies based on magnetic resonance images

control variables

Siemens Trio 3.0 Tesla scanner at the University of Utah
8-channel, receive-only RF head coil
Sagittal 3D MPRAGE T1-weighted images
Inversion time=1100ms, echo time=2.93ms, repetition time=1800ms, flip angle=12degrees, field of view=56mm, slice thickness=1.0mm, 160 slices
No subjects underwent sedation for scanning
No complications encountered in the scanning process

controls

None mentioned
None mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!