Colon tissues from mice were analyzed in accordance with a previously published protocol59 (link). In short, the tissues were excised, distal colonic segments (0.5 cm) were removed and fixed with 4% neutral-buffered formalin (Hepeng Biology, Shanghai, China) for 24 h and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Cross sections of the colon (4 μm) were cut and mounted on slides. The cross sections were then stained with hematoxylin and eosin solution (Sigma-Aldrich). Tissue damage was evaluated by using a score for the severity of epithelial injury, the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration and goblet cell depletion, according to a previously described protocol59 (link). Colonic damage was assigned scores as shown in Table 126 (link).
Colonic damage score criteria used to evaluate the severity of epithelial injury, the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration and goblet cell depletion in mouse tissue.
Score
Colonic damage
Inflammatory cell infiltration
Submucosa
Muscle/serosa
0
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
1
Hyperproliferation, irregular crypts, goblet cell loss
Yao M., Lu Y., Zhang T., Xie J., Han S., Zhang S., Fei Y., Ling Z., Wu J., Hu Y., Ji S., Chen H., Berglund B, & Li L. (2021). Improved functionality of Ligilactobacillus salivarius Li01 in alleviating colonic inflammation by layer-by-layer microencapsulation. NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes, 7, 58.
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required