Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treatment Protocol
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Harvard University, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Johns Hopkins University, University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Wisconsin Division of Public Health, Temple University Health System, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Indiana University Health, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, University of Virginia, Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Washington University in St. Louis, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, Cleveland Clinic, Cancer Institute (WIA), Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Protocol cited in 37 other protocols
Variable analysis
- ECOG-ACRIN
- Southwest Oncology Group
- Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology
- NRG Oncology
- Clinical Trials Support Unit
- Pathological diagnosis of prostate cancer
- Radiologic evidence of metastatic disease
- ECOG performance-status score
- Prior adjuvant ADT duration
- Organ function adequate for docetaxel treatment
- Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level
- ECOG performance-status score (0-2)
- Prior adjuvant ADT duration (24 months or less)
- No evidence of progression during ADT for metastatic disease (within 120 days before randomization)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!