Proteomic Analysis of Acquired Premature Ejaculation
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command
Other organizations : Peking University First Hospital, Peking University, Southern Medical University
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Relative expression levels of seminal plasma proteins between the PE (premature ejaculation) and control groups
- Semen specimens were collected by masturbation into sterile containers after 2–7 days of sexual abstinence
- Semen was tested for C. trachomatis using immunochromatography and cultured for M. urealyticum and M. hominis
- Samples were centrifuged at 1600 ×g for 5 min and supernatant seminal plasma was immediately stored at −80°C
- Seminal plasma samples (six cases for acquired PE and six matched cases for control) were extracted and digested using trypsin
- Proteins were labeled with the TMT reagent
- Peptide analysis was performed using the LTQ-Orbitrap instrument connecting to a Nano AUQUITY UPLC system via a nanospray source
- Raw files of proteomics data were processed using MaxQuant (version 1.2.2.5)
- The false discovery rate (FDR) of the identification was estimated by searching against the databases with the reversed protein sequences
- The site, peptide, and protein FDR were all set to 0.05
- One-way analysis of variance was used to calculate significant differences in abundance among groups
- Positive control: None explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Six matched cases for control group
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!