The tumor volume was calculated based on the volume measured on the CT images. 18F-FMISO uptake by the tumor was evaluated quantitatively using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-liver ration (TLR), tumor-to-muscle ration (TMR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). A polygonal volume of interest (VOI), which included the entire lesion in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, was also examined. The parameters were defined as the following: SUVmax, the SUV of the single highest voxel in the tumor; TMR, the ratio of SUVmax of the tumor to the mean SUV of the gluteal muscle; TLR, the SUVmax of the tumor/the mean SUV of the liver; MTV, the volume of the tumor that exhibited FDG uptake; and TLG, the mean SUV of the tumor × MTV. To determine the MTV, images of the tumor were segmented using a fixed-threshold (SUV, 0.4), referring to the past report (19 (link)). The threshold value was determined by measuring 40% of the mean SUVmax of all tumors (mean ± SEM, 1.07±0.28).
Quantitative Analysis of Tumor Hypoxia
The tumor volume was calculated based on the volume measured on the CT images. 18F-FMISO uptake by the tumor was evaluated quantitatively using the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor-to-liver ration (TLR), tumor-to-muscle ration (TMR), metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). A polygonal volume of interest (VOI), which included the entire lesion in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, was also examined. The parameters were defined as the following: SUVmax, the SUV of the single highest voxel in the tumor; TMR, the ratio of SUVmax of the tumor to the mean SUV of the gluteal muscle; TLR, the SUVmax of the tumor/the mean SUV of the liver; MTV, the volume of the tumor that exhibited FDG uptake; and TLG, the mean SUV of the tumor × MTV. To determine the MTV, images of the tumor were segmented using a fixed-threshold (SUV, 0.4), referring to the past report (19 (link)). The threshold value was determined by measuring 40% of the mean SUVmax of all tumors (mean ± SEM, 1.07±0.28).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Kobe University, Osaka University
Variable analysis
- Tumor volume calculated based on CT images
- Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of 18F-FMISO uptake by the tumor
- Tumor-to-liver ratio (TLR) of 18F-FMISO uptake
- Tumor-to-muscle ratio (TMR) of 18F-FMISO uptake
- Metabolic tumor volume (MTV)
- Total lesion glycolysis (TLG)
- Clinical Osirix MD workstation (Pixmeo) used for image analysis
- Metavol software used for image analysis
- Polygonal volume of interest (VOI) that included the entire lesion in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes
- Fixed-threshold (SUV, 0.4) used to determine the MTV, based on a past report
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!