48 (link) Briefly, lumbar vertebrae were semi‐automatically segmented, and then the shortest distance between each point on the cranial IVD extremity and the caudal IVD extremity was measured for each IVD. The average disc height was calculated as the arithmetic mean of all points along an individual IVD, which was approximately 5000 points. Postoperative disc heights were expressed as a percentage of the preoperative disc heights. Therefore, a relative disc height of less than 100% postoperatively would represent a disc height loss when compared to preoperative values.
Evaluating Lumbar Disc Height Changes
48 (link) Briefly, lumbar vertebrae were semi‐automatically segmented, and then the shortest distance between each point on the cranial IVD extremity and the caudal IVD extremity was measured for each IVD. The average disc height was calculated as the arithmetic mean of all points along an individual IVD, which was approximately 5000 points. Postoperative disc heights were expressed as a percentage of the preoperative disc heights. Therefore, a relative disc height of less than 100% postoperatively would represent a disc height loss when compared to preoperative values.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Other organizations : University of Pennsylvania, Rowan University, City College of New York
Variable analysis
- Time points: preoperatively, immediately postoperatively (W0), 4 weeks postinjury (W4), W8, and after euthanasia at W12
- Disc height changes over time
- Sheep were sedated and anesthetized before in vivo clinical CT imaging
- CT imaging parameters: slice thickness (0.625 mm), slice spacing (0.312 mm), tube voltage (120 kVp), tube current (300 mA)
- Preoperative disc height measurements as a baseline
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!