The approximately unbiased (AU) test119 (link) was used to test the monophyly of the focal group against competing phylogenetic hypotheses (
Phylogenetic Analysis of Apicomplexans and Dinoflagellates
The approximately unbiased (AU) test119 (link) was used to test the monophyly of the focal group against competing phylogenetic hypotheses (
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Ocean University of China, Natural History Museum, Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen University, Institute of Hydrobiology, South China Normal University
Protocol cited in 8 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were carried out using RAxML-HPC2 v7.6.6114
- Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was performed with MrBayes 3.2.2117
- The approximately unbiased (AU) test119 was used to test the monophyly of the focal group against competing phylogenetic hypotheses
- Support for the best-scoring ML tree came from 1000 bootstrap replicates
- Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were run with two sets of four chains for 4,000,000 generations with a sample frequency of 100 generations
- The site-wise likelihoods for the resulting constrained topologies and the non-constrained ML topology were calculated using PAUP120 and were then analyzed in CONSEL121 to obtain p-values
- Three apicomplexans and three dinoflagellates were used as outgroups
- The DNA partition was analyzed with GTR + gamma
- ProtTest 2.4116 selected the MtArt + I + G + F amino acid replacement matrix as the best-fitting model for alpha-tubulin amino acid sequences
- The alpha-tubulin amino acid partition was run under the MtArt + gamma model
- The GTR + I + G model was selected by MrModeltest v.2.2118 for the DNA partition
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!