For testing the effects of BMP4 and dorsomorphin, cells at the beginning of the third day of differentiation were treated with either 25 ng/ml hrBMP4 or 20 μM dorsomorphin until the beginning of the fifth day of differentiation. At D5, cells were isolated for flow cytometry and qPCR analysis. Cells treated with DMSO were used for control experiments.
BMP4-Induced Differentiation of Human CD34+ Cells
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Other organizations : Boston Children's Hospital, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, National Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics, Tohoku Medical and Pharmaceutical University, Hebrew SeniorLife, University of Colorado Boulder
Variable analysis
- RhBMP4 concentration (25 ng/ml)
- Dorsomorphin concentration (20 μM)
- Cell differentiation (measured by flow cytometry and qPCR analysis)
- Cell type (Human CD34+ cells isolated from peripheral blood of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized healthy volunteers)
- Cell expansion medium (StemSpan medium supplemented with StemSpan CC100 cytokine mix and 2% P/S)
- Cell differentiation medium (StemSpan SFEM Medium with 2% P/S, 20 ng/ml SCF, 1 U/ml Epo, 5 ng/ml IL-3, 2 mM dexamethasone, and 1 mM b-estradiol)
- Cell seeding density (0.5-1 x 10^6 cells/ml)
- Positive control: Cells treated with 25 ng/ml hrBMP4
- Negative control: Cells treated with DMSO
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!