The following primary antibodies were used: FITC-conjugated anti-HRP (1:250, Jackson ImmunoResearch laboratories), Rabbit anti-Syt31 (link) (1:1000, H. Bellen, Baylor College of Medicine), mouse monoclonal anti-Dlg (1:1500, 4F3), anti-Brp (1:250, NC82), anti-DCSP2 (1:250, 6D6) and anti-Futsch (1:1000, 22C10) obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), University of Iowa. Anti-Hrp conjugated to Alexa 488 or 568 were used at 1:250. Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa 488, 568, and 647 (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes) were used at 1:200.
Labeling Drosophila Larval Neurons
The following primary antibodies were used: FITC-conjugated anti-HRP (1:250, Jackson ImmunoResearch laboratories), Rabbit anti-Syt31 (link) (1:1000, H. Bellen, Baylor College of Medicine), mouse monoclonal anti-Dlg (1:1500, 4F3), anti-Brp (1:250, NC82), anti-DCSP2 (1:250, 6D6) and anti-Futsch (1:1000, 22C10) obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), University of Iowa. Anti-Hrp conjugated to Alexa 488 or 568 were used at 1:250. Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa 488, 568, and 647 (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes) were used at 1:200.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Variable analysis
- Genotypes of larvae
- Subcellular localization and expression of various synaptic proteins (Syt, Dlg, Brp, DCSP2, Futsch)
- Experimental conditions (Bouin's fixation, processing, imaging settings)
- Primary antibodies (FITC-conjugated anti-HRP, Rabbit anti-Syt, mouse monoclonal anti-Dlg, anti-Brp, anti-DCSP2, anti-Futsch)
- Secondary antibodies (Anti-Hrp conjugated to Alexa 488 or 568, Alexa 488, 568, and 647)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!