Cryosections of the tissues were cut in a cryo-microtome (Leica CM1900-UV) at a thickness of 10 μm and transferred onto conductive indium-tin-oxide-coated glass slides (Bruker Daltonik, Bremen, Germany). The sections were vacuum-dried in a desiccator for approximately 15 min then washed two times in 70% ethanol and once in 96% ethanol for 1 min each. The sections were then dried and stored under vacuum until the matrix was applied. The sections were coated with matrix using an ImagePrep (Bruker Daltonik) according to the manufacturer's standard protocols. The brain and testis samples were coated with α-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid (Bruker Daltonik), while the pancreas sample was coated with sinapinic acid (Bruker Daltonik). All mass spectra were acquired in linear mode on autoflex or ultraflex instruments equipped with smartbeam (pancreas) or smartbeam II lasers (all other samples; Bruker Daltonik). For each pixel, 200 laser shots were accumulated at constant laser energy.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Deininger S.O., Cornett D.S., Paape R., Becker M., Pineau C., Rauser S., Walch A, & Wolski E. (2011). Normalization in MALDI-TOF imaging datasets of proteins: practical considerations. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 401(1), 167-181.
Matrix used (α-cyano-4-hydroxy-cinnamic acid for brain and testis, sinapinic acid for pancreas)
Linear mode on autoflex or ultraflex instruments
Laser shots per pixel (200)
controls
No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required