Cytogenetic analysis was performed using cerebral ganglia of the larvae selected. Metaphase chromosomes were obtained according to the methodology proposed by Imai et al. (1988) (link). Preparations obtained from fifteen individuals per colony were analyzed. The preparations were stained with Giemsa diluted in Sörensen buffer at (4%) for 20 minutes. On average, ten metaphases were analyzed per slide and ten slides were submitted to banding techniques. C-banding was performed by BSG method (Barium hydroxide/Saline/Giemsa) according to Sumner (1972) (link). The protocol of Schweizer (1980) (link) was used for preparation of sequential fluorochrome staining (CMA3/DA/DAPI). Identification of nucleolus organizer regions (NOR) was performed according to Howell and Black (1980) (link). The best metaphases were photographed using an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with a camera Q color 3 Olympus®. Brightness and contrast of the karyotypes were optimized using Photoshop CS4. The karyotypes were mounted in Corel Draw® 13 image editing software. Karyotype structure was described according to the nomenclature proposed by Imai (1991) (link) and Levan et al. (1964) . For mounting of the karyotypes, the chromosomes were sorted into three groups: metacentric chromosomes (M), acrocentric chromosomes (A) with heterochromatin located across the length of the short arm of the chromosomes, and pseudo-acrocentric chromosomes (AM) which possess a long heterochromatic arm (Imai 1991 (link)).
Cytogenetic Analysis of Azteca trigona Ants
Cytogenetic analysis was performed using cerebral ganglia of the larvae selected. Metaphase chromosomes were obtained according to the methodology proposed by Imai et al. (1988) (link). Preparations obtained from fifteen individuals per colony were analyzed. The preparations were stained with Giemsa diluted in Sörensen buffer at (4%) for 20 minutes. On average, ten metaphases were analyzed per slide and ten slides were submitted to banding techniques. C-banding was performed by BSG method (Barium hydroxide/Saline/Giemsa) according to Sumner (1972) (link). The protocol of Schweizer (1980) (link) was used for preparation of sequential fluorochrome staining (CMA3/DA/DAPI). Identification of nucleolus organizer regions (NOR) was performed according to Howell and Black (1980) (link). The best metaphases were photographed using an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with a camera Q color 3 Olympus®. Brightness and contrast of the karyotypes were optimized using Photoshop CS4. The karyotypes were mounted in Corel Draw® 13 image editing software. Karyotype structure was described according to the nomenclature proposed by Imai (1991) (link) and Levan et al. (1964) . For mounting of the karyotypes, the chromosomes were sorted into three groups: metacentric chromosomes (M), acrocentric chromosomes (A) with heterochromatin located across the length of the short arm of the chromosomes, and pseudo-acrocentric chromosomes (AM) which possess a long heterochromatic arm (Imai 1991 (link)).
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Universidade Federal de Viçosa
Protocol cited in 6 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Colony location: Ponte Nova (20°25'S, 42°54'W) and Viçosa (20°45'S, 42°52'W), MG, Brazil
- Karyotype structure of Azteca trigona
- Nucleolus organizer regions (NOR) identification
- Chromosome banding patterns (C-banding, CMA3/DA/DAPI)
- Maintenance of ant colonies in a BOD incubator at 25°C following the protocol described by Cardoso et al. (2011)
- Selection of pre-pupa stage (post-defecating larvae) for cytogenetic analysis
- Use of cerebral ganglia of the larvae for metaphase chromosome preparation
- Staining techniques (Giemsa, BSG method, fluorochrome staining)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!