Between October 2011 and November 2014 VK of control level 1 varied between 6% and 17.5% (mean 10.13%), control level 2 varied between 3.4% and 12.2% (mean 6.89%). For the main regression analyses, we used the detected serum 25(OH)D concentrations as continuous variable. However, for additional analyses (see
Standardized Serum Vitamin D Measurement
Between October 2011 and November 2014 VK of control level 1 varied between 6% and 17.5% (mean 10.13%), control level 2 varied between 3.4% and 12.2% (mean 6.89%). For the main regression analyses, we used the detected serum 25(OH)D concentrations as continuous variable. However, for additional analyses (see
Corresponding Organization : Universität der Bundeswehr München
Variable analysis
- Serum 25(OH)D concentrations as continuous variable
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Blood withdrawal was performed according the protocol [33]
- Measurement of serum vitamin D total was performed according to manufacturer's protocol on an automated laboratory analyzer Cobas 8000 e602 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim Germany) using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) with competition principle (Roche Diagnostics Mannheim Germany)
- Traceability of the method was standardized against LC-MS/MS [34] and LC-MS/MS in turn was standardized against the NIST standard [35]
- Limit of quantitation is 5 ng/ml and the primary measurement range is 5–70 ng/ml
- Samples with concentration higher than 70 ng/ml were diluted manually 1:2 with Diluent Universal (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany)
- Between October 2011 and November 2014 VK of control level 1 varied between 6% and 17.5% (mean 10.13%), control level 2 varied between 3.4% and 12.2% (mean 6.89%)
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!