LMVs/LUVs with 3 mM total lipid concentration were prepared using Hepes or Citrate Phosphate buffer (pH 7.4 or pH 5.0, respectively), as above described. These vesicles contained 0.5 mM pyranine encapsulated35 (link). The following (POPC/SM/Chol ternary mixtures were used: 59.7:26.3:14 (Xlo = 26) and 34:32.7:33.3 (Xlo = 0.83). Liposomes encapsulating pyranine were recovered (after separation through a Sephadex G-25 column) mainly in fractions 3 and 4 (1 mL each). Liposome final concentration was determined by lipid phosphorous analysis50 (link), for the samples prepared in Hepes buffer. The liposomes were then diluted to approximately 0.2 mM lipid concentration in 96 well opaque plates and fluorescence measurements were performed at 24 °C, in a microplate reader (Spectramax Gemini EM), using 405 and 450 nm as the excitation wavelengths and 510 nm as emission wavelength. The auto mix option of the microplate reader was selected to mix the samples 5 seconds before the first read and 3 seconds between reads. To evaluate the stability of the pH gradient in LMVs, the fluorescence measurements were performed during ap. 5 hours. After this time, triton X100 (0.1% (v/v)) was added to the samples in order to obtain the fluorescence intensity induced by an immediate burst of the vesicles. Some of the wells with LMVs (without the addition of triton X100) were left overnight and measurements were also performed next day, to observe if the pH gradient remained stable. No significant changes were observed (data not shown). Samples with acidic and neutral pH both inside and outside the vesicles were prepared to obtain the fluorescence intensity of pyranine at only acidic and neutral conditions (control samples). The stability of the LMVs was evaluated in the absence and presence of Sph (pre-incorporation of 10 mol% Sph and external addition of 10 mol% Sph). In the studies where Sph is externally added, Sph was dissolved in a small volume of absolute ethanol (ethanol was kept below to 1% v/v to prevent vesicle destabilization) and added to lipid vesicle suspensions (the auto mix option of the microplate reader was selected to mix the samples 5 seconds before the first read and 3 seconds between reads). Control experiments were also performed by adding the same volume of ethanol, without Sph.
Evaluating pH Gradient Stability in LMVs
LMVs/LUVs with 3 mM total lipid concentration were prepared using Hepes or Citrate Phosphate buffer (pH 7.4 or pH 5.0, respectively), as above described. These vesicles contained 0.5 mM pyranine encapsulated35 (link). The following (POPC/SM/Chol ternary mixtures were used: 59.7:26.3:14 (Xlo = 26) and 34:32.7:33.3 (Xlo = 0.83). Liposomes encapsulating pyranine were recovered (after separation through a Sephadex G-25 column) mainly in fractions 3 and 4 (1 mL each). Liposome final concentration was determined by lipid phosphorous analysis50 (link), for the samples prepared in Hepes buffer. The liposomes were then diluted to approximately 0.2 mM lipid concentration in 96 well opaque plates and fluorescence measurements were performed at 24 °C, in a microplate reader (Spectramax Gemini EM), using 405 and 450 nm as the excitation wavelengths and 510 nm as emission wavelength. The auto mix option of the microplate reader was selected to mix the samples 5 seconds before the first read and 3 seconds between reads. To evaluate the stability of the pH gradient in LMVs, the fluorescence measurements were performed during ap. 5 hours. After this time, triton X100 (0.1% (v/v)) was added to the samples in order to obtain the fluorescence intensity induced by an immediate burst of the vesicles. Some of the wells with LMVs (without the addition of triton X100) were left overnight and measurements were also performed next day, to observe if the pH gradient remained stable. No significant changes were observed (data not shown). Samples with acidic and neutral pH both inside and outside the vesicles were prepared to obtain the fluorescence intensity of pyranine at only acidic and neutral conditions (control samples). The stability of the LMVs was evaluated in the absence and presence of Sph (pre-incorporation of 10 mol% Sph and external addition of 10 mol% Sph). In the studies where Sph is externally added, Sph was dissolved in a small volume of absolute ethanol (ethanol was kept below to 1% v/v to prevent vesicle destabilization) and added to lipid vesicle suspensions (the auto mix option of the microplate reader was selected to mix the samples 5 seconds before the first read and 3 seconds between reads). Control experiments were also performed by adding the same volume of ethanol, without Sph.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Lisbon
Protocol cited in 3 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Presence or absence of sphingomyelin (Sph) (pre-incorporation of 10 mol% Sph and external addition of 10 mol% Sph)
- Fluorescence intensity of pyranine at 510 nm emission wavelength with excitation at 405 nm and 450 nm
- Stability of the pH gradient in LMVs over time
- Total lipid concentration of LMVs/LUVs (3 mM)
- Encapsulated pyranine concentration (0.5 mM)
- Lipid composition of LMVs/LUVs (POPC/SM/Chol ternary mixtures: 59.7:26.3:14 and 34:32.7:33.3)
- PH of the buffer used to prepare LMVs/LUVs (pH 7.4 for Hepes buffer, pH 5.0 for Citrate Phosphate buffer)
- Temperature (24 °C)
- Microplate reader settings (auto mix option, mixing time, and read interval)
- Samples with acidic and neutral pH both inside and outside the vesicles to obtain the fluorescence intensity of pyranine at only acidic and neutral conditions
- Addition of the same volume of ethanol, without Sph, to the lipid vesicle suspensions
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!