Patients were recruited at 58 centres globally (see online
Ankylosing Spondylitis Trial Protocol
Patients were recruited at 58 centres globally (see online
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Leiden University Medical Center
Other organizations : Oregon Health & Science University, China Medical University, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Toldy Ferenc Kórház, Pfizer (United States)
Protocol cited in 6 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score
- Back pain score
- Patients ≥18 years of age
- Patients fulfilled the modified New York (mNY) criteria for AS, confirmed by centralised reading of sacroiliac (SI) radiographs
- Patients had active disease based on BASDAI score ≥4 and back pain score ≥4
- Patients with history of either inadequate response to ≥2 oral NSAIDs or intolerance to prior NSAIDs
- Patients with C reactive protein (CRP) levels within the normal reference range and those with active arthritis, enthesitis or psoriasis could be enrolled, provided mNY criteria for AS were met
- Patients were permitted to continue concurrent treatment with methotrexate, sulfasalazine and stable oral corticosteroids (<10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent)
- No eligibility criteria relating to MRI were specified
- Exclusion criteria included current or prior biological DMARD treatment and evidence of active, latent or inadequately treated tuberculosis infection
- Positive control: None mentioned
- Negative control: None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!