The CT images used for this study were those typically termed “high resolution”: non-volumetric 1 mm slices with 10 mm spacing with a sharp kernel image reconstruction obtained without the administration of intravenous contrast. Using a previously described automated technique, the lung was segmented from the surrounding tissue [21 (link)]. The axial images were then visually inspected and manually edited as needed to correct inaccurate segmentations. For the densitometric evaluation, the histogram of distribution of the density of each voxel within the lung was plotted as shown in Fig. 1, and the skewness, kurtosis, and the mean of that distribution (mean lung density, MLD) were measured. In addition, the percentage of the total volume of tissue that had a density between -250 Hounsfield units (HU) and -600 HU was recorded as the percent high attenuation area (HAA%) [22 (link)].
a Representative images from subjects with less severe (Patient 1) and more severe (Patient 2) visual evidence of IPF. b Histograms of distribution of the number of voxels on the y axis for each tissue density in Hounsfield Units on the x axis. c Summary statistics and selected pulmonary function test parameters for each subject. Abbreviations: mean lung density (MLD)
Full details regarding the local histogram based objective quantification of the volume of radiographic feature subtypes are available in the (Additional file 1). Briefly, we used both the properties of the local tissue and the distance from the pleural surface to determine a radiographic feature subtype for every portion of the lung [18 (link), 19 , 23 ]. First, in order to train the subtype identification tool, a single expert placed a total of 3357 fiducials, in 30 randomly selected subjects, on the following radiographic subtypes: normal, interstitial (reticular, centrilobular nodule, linear scar, nodular, subpleural line, ground glass and honeycombing), and emphysematous (centrilobular and panlobular) as shown in Fig. 2.1 This was done to build a library of points to be used as tissue classifiers. Regions of interest consisting of 30 by 30 in-plane voxels were built around these training points, and both the local histogram information and distance from the pleural surface were used to create a tissue classification vector for each region [18 (link), 19 ]. After the training process was completed, the feature vectors of all of the 30 by 30 in-plane voxel regions within the lungs of each of the subjects were classified into tissue subtypes based on their similarity to the training data as shown in Fig. 3.
a Sample slice for CT scan of a subject. b The same sample slice from a subject CT scan showing placement of fiducials for the training of the local histogram based objective method. Abbreviations: ground glass (GG), honeycombing (Hon), reticular (Ret), computed tomography (CT)
a Representative CT images from subjects with less severe IPF (patient 1) and more severe IPF (patient 2). b Overlay of categorization of lung parenchyma into radiographic subtypes using the local histogram analysis and distance based analysis for each subject. c Legend for radiographic subtypes
Kaplan Meier survival curves for transplant free survival for the densitometric CT measures. a HAA%, b MLD, c skewness, d kurtosis. Abbreviations: percentage of high attenuation area (HAA%), mean lung density (MLD)
The total percentage of all of the interstitial features (objective interstitial score, interstitial%) was then determined by combining the reticular, centrilobular nodule, linear scar, nodular, subpleural line, ground glass and honeycombing subtype volumes and dividing by the total volume of all tissue types (normal, interstitial and emphysematous). The percentage of interstitial disease made up of by honeycombing (honeycombing%) was determined by dividing the volume of the honeycombing subtype by the total volume of all of the interstitial subtypes. Due to the exploratory nature and small size of this study, subjects used in the training set were not excluded from the final analysis.
Ash S.Y., Harmouche R., Vallejo D.L., Villalba J.A., Ostridge K., Gunville R., Come C.E., Onieva Onieva J., Ross J.C., Hunninghake G.M., El-Chemaly S.Y., Doyle T.J., Nardelli P., Sanchez-Ferrero G.V., Goldberg H.J., Rosas I.O., San Jose Estepar R, & Washko G.R. (2017). Densitometric and local histogram based analysis of computed tomography images in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiratory Research, 18, 45.
Publication 2017
Axis Computed tomography Densitometric Emphysematous Intravenous administration LibraryLung Patient Pleural Pulmonary function test Radiographic Scan Scar Tissue Tissue types Training process Transplant survival Vectors
Corresponding Organization : Brigham and Women's Hospital
Other organizations :
NIHR Southampton Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Creighton University
Skewness of the histogram of distribution of the density of each voxel within the lung
Kurtosis of the histogram of distribution of the density of each voxel within the lung
Mean of the histogram of distribution of the density of each voxel within the lung (mean lung density, MLD)
Percentage of the total volume of tissue that had a density between -250 Hounsfield units (HU) and -600 HU (percent high attenuation area, HAA%)
Total percentage of all of the interstitial features (objective interstitial score, interstitial%)
Percentage of interstitial disease made up of by honeycombing (honeycombing%)
control variables
CT images used were non-volumetric 1 mm slices with 10 mm spacing with a sharp kernel image reconstruction obtained without the administration of intravenous contrast
Lung was segmented from the surrounding tissue using a previously described automated technique
Axial images were then visually inspected and manually edited as needed to correct inaccurate segmentations
positive controls
None specified
negative controls
None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required